Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
AMR pilots warn management >

AMR pilots warn management

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AMR pilots warn management

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2006, 04:42 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Default

Back on topic. The argument used to be that the "rules" were put into place for safety reasons, not economic. If the pilots use the leverage of the China routes to get the economic benefits they want, and in turn agree to change the "rules" then so be it, but in doing so they concede the safety argument and will have no business ragging on JetBlue pilots doing the same thing on the transcon turns their company wants.

I think most experts and pilots would agree that longer duty hours are more fatiguing than more flight hours.

Agreeing to change safety rules for economic reasons is a slippery slope of hypocrisy.

Just a thought.
Widow's Son is offline  
Old 11-13-2006, 08:00 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by Widow's Son
Back on topic. The argument used to be that the "rules" were put into place for safety reasons, not economic. If the pilots use the leverage of the China routes to get the economic benefits they want, and in turn agree to change the "rules" then so be it, but in doing so they concede the safety argument and will have no business ragging on JetBlue pilots doing the same thing on the transcon turns their company wants.

I think most experts and pilots would agree that longer duty hours are more fatiguing than more flight hours.

Agreeing to change safety rules for economic reasons is a slippery slope of hypocrisy.

Just a thought.

What are you talking about? We currently fly ORD-DEL with 4 pilots. 3 FOs and 1 Captain. We wanted 2 FOs and 2 Captains. We temporarily agreed to DEL. However why in the world should we side letter a Super Long Haul agreement outside of Sec 6.

Unlike YOUR transcon turns this is not a safety issue here. This is a power struggle and an effort to regain what we lost. Why don't you put a relief pilot on your transcon turns?

Lastly with no other airplanes on order, it will be a simple allocation shift, take from this route to fly Bejing. Nothing is gained for the pilot group.

AMR negotiated a concessionary contract with us in a couple months. Before the savings were realized they gained in cash on hand and reported operatig profits. If they NEED Bejing so bad then negotiate in good faith and get a contract done now including super long haul.

Do I want us to fly Bejing, YES, however we have ALL let this profession slide long enough. Time to pull out, even if it means losing some some things along the way.

Regards,
AA
AAflyer is offline  
Old 11-13-2006, 09:19 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
furloughman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 122
Default

It's about time a pilot spoke in terms of what's good for his profession. The more we stick together and do what's right for the profession, the better we will all benifit as individuals. Pilots need to stop acting in a selfish mannor and start making decisions as a group. When this happens, we will all see the rewards of pay and QOL that was stripped from us.
furloughman is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 04:41 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Default

AA,

The duty time limitation that AA wants APA to waive was put there under the pretense of SAFETY.

Whether you personally think a longer duty day is safe enough to accept for contract enhancements really doesn't matter although studies have shown that longer duty days are more fatiguing than more flying in a shorter day.

How many pilots on board doesn't matter either as they all are on the same duty day.

Waiving the restriction for an economic benefit is fine if that is what you want to do but it puts you in the situation of hypocritically condemning others for doing the same thing, as the legacy pilots have done towards the JetBlue pilots who are trying to help themselves and their company out. (No, I don't work for JetBlue.)

It reminds me of the woman in the bar who says she'll sleep with a guy hitting on her for a million dollars, but when he asks if she'll take ten dollars instead she says "what do you think I am?" To which he responds "we already know what you are, we are just negotiating the price."

The legacy pilots have a long history of wrapping themselves in the safety flag over issues that are really economic. Sometimes this comes back to haunt them later.
Widow's Son is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 06:03 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,918
Default

Welcome to the new message board, AAFlyer! Taking a break from FI?

cheers,
73
aa73 is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 06:18 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
Welcome to the new message board, AAFlyer! Taking a break from FI?

cheers,
73
I thought I would diversify like you.

AAflyer

No hats, and more recalls
AAflyer is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 06:20 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by Widow's Son
AA,

The duty time limitation that AA wants APA to waive was put there under the pretense of SAFETY.

Whether you personally think a longer duty day is safe enough to accept for contract enhancements really doesn't matter although studies have shown that longer duty days are more fatiguing than more flying in a shorter day.

How many pilots on board doesn't matter either as they all are on the same duty day.

Waiving the restriction for an economic benefit is fine if that is what you want to do but it puts you in the situation of hypocritically condemning others for doing the same thing, as the legacy pilots have done towards the JetBlue pilots who are trying to help themselves and their company out. (No, I don't work for JetBlue.)

It reminds me of the woman in the bar who says she'll sleep with a guy hitting on her for a million dollars, but when he asks if she'll take ten dollars instead she says "what do you think I am?" To which he responds "we already know what you are, we are just negotiating the price."

The legacy pilots have a long history of wrapping themselves in the safety flag over issues that are really economic. Sometimes this comes back to haunt them later.
My mistake for assuming you were with JB. I guess we are all hypocrites.

Oh ya, liars and cheats as well.

AAflyer
AAflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nw320driver
Foreign
35
10-15-2010 07:41 PM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM
nw320driver
Major
15
11-17-2006 07:45 AM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
04-29-2005 07:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices