1986 Salary Survey
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 270
If your lawyer friend didn't want to be at the office so much he should have become a pilot.
When the regulations require doctors and lawyers to work less than 100/month and 30/7 then people can whine about them not working enough.
When the regulations require doctors and lawyers to work less than 100/month and 30/7 then people can whine about them not working enough.
#22
What????????? I hope you are not insinuating pilots only work 100/month and 30/7
#23
The "stick it to the customer to keep our pay higher" attitude will not win out in the long run.
Your statement above is telling the customer that he needs to accept less choices and pay more so that the two guys in the front of the airplane can move from the 95th up to th 97th percentile of highest paid people in the country.
#24
I could be wrong, but considering most reserve lines have a minimum of 12 days off, I can't see someone with the seniority to make $250,000 a year working 20 days a month with a major airline.[/QUOTE]
Alright, I have to admit I am one of those guys. I sit reserve with -8- days off a month and make about 30,000 a year.....that is GROSS PAY! To top it off I do this in the left seat. The really sad thing is that the same Captains flying the same airplanes 15 years ago made the same dollars...NOT considering "Today's Dollars".
To think I was actually having a good day till you guys made me think about that!
Alright, I have to admit I am one of those guys. I sit reserve with -8- days off a month and make about 30,000 a year.....that is GROSS PAY! To top it off I do this in the left seat. The really sad thing is that the same Captains flying the same airplanes 15 years ago made the same dollars...NOT considering "Today's Dollars".
To think I was actually having a good day till you guys made me think about that!
#25
New Hire
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 1
Taking Pride
Sorry engineering major. Not worth the time. I hate grammer didn't know this was a grammer test. Got enought of that from my 80 year old english teacher grandmother. See ya.
Last edited by Darmtn; 11-11-2006 at 02:08 PM. Reason: sorry engineering major hated grammer did not know this was a grammer test
#26
I have meet the type of pilot that says why should we command those wages. Or those from the outside looking in that really do not know what they are talking about. We as a profession of pilots must stand up for and have a value for what we do. To compare my dedication hard work and discipline to get where I am as a commercial pilot and be compared to a lawyer is most insulting.
#27
My point is, salaries should have doubled by now. Interestingly the pay for Horizon and Comair have pretty much done that. However the major airline pilot pay has done the opposite. This is not news but look how far we've fallen. 160K then should be about 320K now. Delta was right in there before their big fall.
I believe we should use this data to rally support for huge pay increases. This has to be done by ALPA national scale of course. We need 100% raises to get back to "the good old days". This is what has to happen.
1. Get as many major contracts as possible to become amendable on the same date. 2012 would be good timing. This has to be the only part of the negotiations that is not negotiable.
2. Decide, on a national level, on one contract. There should be regional differences in pay and differentials for aircraft size etc...
3. When the date approaches, call the management of all the concerned airlines together and negotiate.
The idea here is to level the playing field. All airlines would pay the same (with small regional differences) so they would not be able to use different labor costs as an excuse for profit or loss. Labor would become an expense as non-negotiable as fuel. "You want to fly 737's? This is what it will cost you!"
It is a pipe dream, I know. If I was running for ALPA president, it would be my platform. It could happen but it would take an extraordinary leader with vision.
I believe we should use this data to rally support for huge pay increases. This has to be done by ALPA national scale of course. We need 100% raises to get back to "the good old days". This is what has to happen.
1. Get as many major contracts as possible to become amendable on the same date. 2012 would be good timing. This has to be the only part of the negotiations that is not negotiable.
2. Decide, on a national level, on one contract. There should be regional differences in pay and differentials for aircraft size etc...
3. When the date approaches, call the management of all the concerned airlines together and negotiate.
The idea here is to level the playing field. All airlines would pay the same (with small regional differences) so they would not be able to use different labor costs as an excuse for profit or loss. Labor would become an expense as non-negotiable as fuel. "You want to fly 737's? This is what it will cost you!"
It is a pipe dream, I know. If I was running for ALPA president, it would be my platform. It could happen but it would take an extraordinary leader with vision.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 276
Decide, on a national level, on one contract. There should be regional differences in pay and differentials for aircraft size etc... All airlines would pay the same (with small regional differences) so they would not be able to use different labor costs as an excuse for profit or loss. Labor would become an expense as non-negotiable as fuel. "You want to fly 737's? This is what it will cost you!"
It is a pipe dream, I know. If I was running for ALPA president, it would be my platform. It could happen but it would take an extraordinary leader with vision.
It is a pipe dream, I know. If I was running for ALPA president, it would be my platform. It could happen but it would take an extraordinary leader with vision.
I agree that the idea of a National wage scale has merit. But to implement that, you'd almost have to have a national seniority list. That is something that NO responsible CEO is going to have forced down his throat. What you would likely see are failing or poorly-performing airlines being broken up and sold piecemeal, with routes, gates, and equipment being transferred to non-union startups.
Almost EVERY cost associated with running an airline becomes negotiable when that airlines existence is being threatened by falling revenue and/or profits. Aircraft leases are renegotiated, delivery dates forestalled, fuel and airport taxes are abated, and wages and working conditions are re-written for both union and non-union employees. In order for a National seniority list to have any teeth, you'd have to have pilots who are so rabidly committed to that ideal that they'd rather see their airline disappear from the face of the earth, than to take a 10% pay cut. And that's not gonna happen...
They say that the airline business runs on about a 7-year cycle. What constitutes a "lucrative professional career" runs on about a 10-15 year cycle. In the mid-late 50's, a newly-minted engineer could name his price on the job market. But by the time the first Apollo missions were being flown, many engineers were lucky to be driving ice-cream trucks. The same cycle applies to pilots. In the mid-late 60's, guys (and ONLY guys) were being hired into legacy cockpits with 200 hrs and a commercial liicense. Ten years later, the job market was awash with pilots, while engineering was again a great business to be in.
Hang tough. In another couple of years, this'll be a cool job to have again...
#29
This may be the bottom with respect to the airline profession. I see a bright future. Good luck to us all.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post