Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

US Airways Calls

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2012, 11:01 PM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320 R
Posts: 37
Default

Noooooo!!!
Cactus has it all wrong XJT!! Do not believe a word of it.All the legacy carriers are bad and getting worse-soon you will have to pay for your crew meals , they will charge you roaming rates when you make a PA, and rumor has it they will use the free space on the side of your flight bag as a billboard.


But the future is cloudy in all honesty.I have read that 150 a barrel oil will be the new normal soon.That can either kill aviation and we all bike from EWR to LAX (and grow our own food too) or airlines will be forced to optimize routes to airframes.
This will imply higher load factors and less frequency to any given city pair.Some routes may take a 90 seater, some a 400 seater.I think the future will have a market driven form of re-regulation.Ticket costs will result in less demand.

The RJ will be forced out of the game.Honestly all the consolidation and mergers we see now are the result of CEOs looking into a future of high oil prices and a need to get rid of competition. I doubt they see a rosy picture for a higher cost per seat 50-90 seater.

The other end of the coin is that the majors will not grow.At any legacy you may never see the left seat in this scenario.But at a feeder you may very well get grounded permanently.

Our careers are controlled by oil cost.
Ekpt40 is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 11:03 PM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320 R
Posts: 37
Default But I could be wrong

double post-deleted

Last edited by Ekpt40; 09-12-2012 at 11:07 PM. Reason: dbl post
Ekpt40 is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 11:38 PM
  #53  
Don't need that HUD!
 
trent890's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: B777/B787 - Flight Test
Posts: 318
Default

Originally Posted by Lifeisgood
Can someone smart tell me what procentage of US Airways list wil be retired in 5 and 10 years.
Thank you.
Originally Posted by lolwut
Somebody set us up the retirements.
Originally Posted by cactusmike
Retirements in the next 5 to 10 years? A ****eload. There are F/Os on the East that will retire at 65 still in that seat but the new guys will see a lot of turnover in the next decade.
For those that prefer to deal with the raw numbers, it's all right there on the airline profile page at: Airline Pilot Central - US Airways | Legacy

5100 Pilots, roughly 250 retirements per year for the next 12 years. That's just under 5% movement up the seniority list each year. 5 years = 25% advancement, 10 years = 50% advancement.

For others who might prefer a picture, I offer:


Copied from the data another gent has gathered at Airline Pilot Demand Comparison | Audries Aircraft Analysis

If you visit that webpage, you will see that his data indicates a US Airways new-hire will climb one-third (33%) of the way up the seniority list by 2018. Additionally, that same new-hire will have continued climbing to nearly two-thirds (64%) of the way up the seniority list in 10 years, by 2023.

You may notice the significant seniority advancement in the next 5 to 10 years at places like Spirit, Virgin America, Emirates, and JetBlue. This advancement is due to growth that comes from the significant number of new airframes that each carrier has on order. Whether these orders will actually result in a new delivery and fleet growth 5 years from now is very speculative. I'm certain there is some advancement at these carriers due to retirements over the next several years, but it is largely overshadowed by questionable growth resulting from an overzealous aircraft order book.

And a final statement: After 2025 or so, what is the next airline that has new-hire pilots from 2012/2013 outpacing the rest of the industry in advancement up the seniority list? That's right, it's potential merger partner American Airlines.

Last edited by trent890; 09-13-2012 at 12:04 AM.
trent890 is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 01:17 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Desert Sky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 264
Talking

Originally Posted by eaglefly
They may have sold it, but it wouldn't have worked without eager parasites to burrow their proboscis in at the first opportunity. Enjoy that 84K, you're at the peak of your earning power in this game. Ironically, my bet says you have one of the sorest feet around here in 3-4 years from kicking garbage cans around your crew room when your host runs dry and you have to accept new terms to re-bury your proboscis.
This post is some funny ish!
Desert Sky is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 04:27 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by XJT Pilot
I agree about the retirement's but im not gonna take a 80% pay cut for the same job im doing now. When they sign a contract that is industry standard or better ill apply. Till then im not gonna work for food!

For me its about money, i will have no problem throwing the gear handle for 110 an hour for anyone and enjoy life not chasing it. Only need this to ride out another 15 years and im on tge beach smoking a big fat one!
Well said. As the spouse of an "eastie", I am dumbfounded of usairways ability to get applicants. Okay, first year pay should be LOWER to offset training costs etc. But at usair, it's the first five or six years that are ridiculous. By year two-and-a-half, do they offer assistance in filing personal chapter 7? Sad too, because my hubbie was grossing over 11k per month c. 1992.
Xjet is right; why go there with such terrible pay? Why not wait til they ponie up the money? With all these desperate souls applying, why should they!
On a side note: it makes perfect sense for an rj fo, but captain? No way.
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 05:20 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SilverandSore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CA
Posts: 483
Default

Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot
Well said. As the spouse of an "eastie", I am dumbfounded of usairways ability to get applicants. Okay, first year pay should be LOWER to offset training costs etc. But at usair, it's the first five or six years that are ridiculous. By year two-and-a-half, do they offer assistance in filing personal chapter 7? Sad too, because my hubbie was grossing over 11k per month c. 1992.
Xjet is right; why go there with such terrible pay? Why not wait til they ponie up the money? With all these desperate souls applying, why should they!
On a side note: it makes perfect sense for an rj fo, but captain? No way.
Yes way. Simply use one of the many payscale comparison sites available out there (including here), an rj captain does better in the long run at Airways. Even with their current deplorable pay rates, the long term earnings are greater. Throw in better work rules, retirement contribution and treatment and it's an easy sell. You may not think that, on the inside looking out, but from the folks I've talked to that worked at places like Chautauqua, ASA, Expressjet etc, life at Airways still beats those places hands down. The big factor however, is the revolving door that regional contracts have become. Comair, Pinnacle anyone? Look at ASA, great they got the American contract but 11 more planes are coming out of Atlanta and the Delta side. You have to have nearly 10 years with the company to hold left seat in Atlanta, who would have thought that after the original Dallas base closure?
SilverandSore is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 06:07 AM
  #57  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Im gonna chime in here. I have been at XJT for 6 years, I am 16 away from CA and I applied and am hoping I get the call. It might be because my wife has a great job, but I would rather be a 3rd year F/O on the 190 making 47/hr as opposed to a 7+ year CA at XJT making $76/hr. Heck, I would rather be a furloughed US Airways pilot than a currently employed one at XJT. I have been here prior the merger and we were run like a major airline, now it is a completely different company. The Crew Schedulers constantly attempt to violate the contract, our MX dept has completely gone to Sh--, I have had 3 gate returns in the past 6 months because MX installed the wrong part! and signed it off as good to go, that's pretty scary if you ask me. I also am seeing whats going on in negotiations and our current contract, with our great work rules, amazing vacation, etc is under a lot of pressure to be "changed", you know, to be more "cost competitive"
While I agree a middle of the pack CA seems like a decent gig now compared to an Airways F/O, I think it's extremely short-sighted.... I am not faulting anyone for staying ( I cant see how a single source provider for a family can provide anything for their family while on the current junior Airways payscale), but for me, I have 6,000hrs Total time, 5,000 SIC, I need to get out of here ASAP.......
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 08:06 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by SilverandSore
Yes way. Simply use one of the many payscale comparison sites available out there (including here), an rj captain does better in the long run at Airways. Even with their current deplorable pay rates, the long term earnings are greater. Throw in better work rules, retirement contribution and treatment and it's an easy sell. You may not think that, on the inside looking out, but from the folks I've talked to that worked at places like Chautauqua, ASA, Expressjet etc, life at Airways still beats those places hands down. The big factor however, is the revolving door that regional contracts have become. Comair, Pinnacle anyone? Look at ASA, great they got the American contract but 11 more planes are coming out of Atlanta and the Delta side. You have to have nearly 10 years with the company to hold left seat in Atlanta, who would have thought that after the original Dallas base closure?
Short-sighted? What about the harsh financial hardships that you will incur during those 5-7 years? How long will it take you to recoup those lost wages? If you're single, living in mom's basement, fine. If you're the man of the house, how in the world can you justify those "wages"?
Once again, if you're a regional fo, yes usairways would be a great "upgrade"; for a rj captain, it could put your life into a tailspin.
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 08:26 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SilverandSore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CA
Posts: 483
Default

Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot
Short-sighted? What about the harsh financial hardships that you will incur during those 5-7 years? How long will it take you to recoup those lost wages? If you're single, living in mom's basement, fine. If you're the man of the house, how in the world can you justify those "wages"?
Once again, if you're a regional fo, yes usairways would be a great "upgrade"; for a rj captain, it could put your life into a tailspin.
Wouldn't the definition of short sighted be roughly akin to only looking at the next 5-7 years? I can easily justify it by looking a little further down the road (you know, more than 7 years) and preparing for it by not living beyond my means as a regional captain. Something my wife and I have planned on and done for years. Being a lifer at a regional and then getting Comair'd could also put your life in a tailspin. It's still a better bet.
SilverandSore is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 08:34 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by SilverandSore
Wouldn't the definition of short sighted be roughly akin to only looking at the next 5-7 years? I can easily justify it by looking a little further down the road (you know, more than 7 years) and preparing for it by not living beyond my means as a regional captain. Something my wife and I have planned on and done for years. Being a lifer at a regional and then getting Comair'd could also put your life in a tailspin. It's still a better bet.
So you're ok with living off of the shirt tails of your wife while your new employer works on a new contract? Seems unfair to your spouse, but I suppose that more and more men are ok with this these days. How about wait until they start paying more? Or set your focus on someone who pays (e.g. Delta).
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
RedBaron007
Major
3
01-31-2007 09:05 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices