Hawaiian to start regional subsidiary
#31
Don't worry. In typical Hawaiian style. It will be all fubar.
The smart thing to do is have AIS run the TP operation. Why engage in all the fuss over MKK, LNY and JHM.
That operation will never make a dime run by HA. But maybe that's just the point.
The smart thing to do is have AIS run the TP operation. Why engage in all the fuss over MKK, LNY and JHM.
That operation will never make a dime run by HA. But maybe that's just the point.
#32
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 41
Another aspect some people have mentioned is that since newhires at HAL are seat-locked in type for 2 years, if the prop was on the HAL certificate you would see them hire a bunch for it, then hire another class down the road for the Airbus. So you would have a bunch of ATR pilots senior to A330 pilots. Which would be a nightmare for training when everyone's seat-lock expires and they all bid out and displace each other en-masse. Would be a real disaster. With the strong scope language in place, and the reasons they have given for doing this (try Google the Star-Advertiser articles) it may work out pretty well, really.
Last edited by HighTailN2Pipes; 10-27-2012 at 02:01 AM.
#34
I've got ATR time and a ATR type and I'd love a PIC gig in Hawaii (or get on with HAL itself). To get a possible jump on this I called Hawaiian but didn't get very far, they were nice and did acknowledged its existence. They didn't have any real information (for me) nor a working name.
What do you think the odds are that they will use another certificate holder? There are but three carriers in the US that now fly ATR's (excepting Eagle who'll dump theirs soon). I am not sure I could live in Hawaii (or elsewhere) on the wages the other 3 already pay - and they rightfully would hire/promote from within - I am sure many of those pilots would gladly jump from BFE to Hawaii. If they bought and own the airplanes themselves this doesn't necessarily mean they'd have to use their certificate, as two of the other US ATR operators don't own their planes.
Any guesses?
What do you think the odds are that they will use another certificate holder? There are but three carriers in the US that now fly ATR's (excepting Eagle who'll dump theirs soon). I am not sure I could live in Hawaii (or elsewhere) on the wages the other 3 already pay - and they rightfully would hire/promote from within - I am sure many of those pilots would gladly jump from BFE to Hawaii. If they bought and own the airplanes themselves this doesn't necessarily mean they'd have to use their certificate, as two of the other US ATR operators don't own their planes.
Any guesses?
#35
just past ETP
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Cruise Captain
Posts: 505
I
Another aspect some people have mentioned is that since newhires at HAL are seat-locked in type for 2 years, if the prop was on the HAL certificate you would see them hire a bunch for it, then hire another class down the road for the Airbus. So you would have a bunch of ATR pilots senior to A330 pilots. Which would be a nightmare for training when everyone's seat-lock expires and they all bid out and displace each other en-masse. Would be a real disaster. With the strong scope language in place, and the reasons they have given for doing this (try Google the Star-Advertiser articles) it may work out pretty well, really.
Another aspect some people have mentioned is that since newhires at HAL are seat-locked in type for 2 years, if the prop was on the HAL certificate you would see them hire a bunch for it, then hire another class down the road for the Airbus. So you would have a bunch of ATR pilots senior to A330 pilots. Which would be a nightmare for training when everyone's seat-lock expires and they all bid out and displace each other en-masse. Would be a real disaster. With the strong scope language in place, and the reasons they have given for doing this (try Google the Star-Advertiser articles) it may work out pretty well, really.
IF the ATR paid a decent rate, especially on the PIC front, there would be plenty of pilots bidding it just to be home every night.
#38
I departed Island air in 96. Didn't realize they had gone down hill that far.
I have always believed a very well run big TP operation would do very well in Hawaii. It really is the ideal market for TPs.
I agree, I don't like to do business with unreliable operators.
Cheers
I have always believed a very well run big TP operation would do very well in Hawaii. It really is the ideal market for TPs.
I agree, I don't like to do business with unreliable operators.
Cheers
#39
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 41
Hawaiian Airlines parent buys aircraft for future service to Lanai, Molokai - Pacific Business News
Try doing an aircraft registration search of "N801HC". Recognize that owner's street address? If the plan is to start later next year, like the articles say, they have PLENTY of time to hire people, etc.
#40
New Hire
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ 900, FO
Posts: 7
But I doubt it will be comparable pay yeah? Probably similar to what Island Air is paying their pilots?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post