Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Hawaiian to start regional subsidiary >

Hawaiian to start regional subsidiary

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Hawaiian to start regional subsidiary

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2012, 01:17 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Beaver Hunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 294
Default

Don't worry. In typical Hawaiian style. It will be all fubar.
The smart thing to do is have AIS run the TP operation. Why engage in all the fuss over MKK, LNY and JHM.
That operation will never make a dime run by HA. But maybe that's just the point.
Beaver Hunter is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 01:40 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Beaver Hunter
Don't worry. In typical Hawaiian style. It will be all fubar.
The smart thing to do is have AIS run the TP operation. Why engage in all the fuss over MKK, LNY and JHM.
That operation will never make a dime run by HA. But maybe that's just the point.
I don't think HAL cares if they lose money on the ATR deal or not. WP has been dropping the ball with flight cancellations and delays, and it would be a shock if that wasn't causing HAL some hurt. It can't be cheap to put up 30 people up in Manele Bay or the Grand Wailea overnight because their WP codeshare flight is scheduled to be delayed 4 hours or cancelled, and they all miss their connection to first-class seats going home to Japan or New York or wherever. Yeah. Resorts are EXPENSIVE at those places, empty first class Airbus seats don't make money, and you don't get a lot of good international word-of-mouth, goodwill, or travel reviews (re: contracts) by giving high-roller customers crappy service through your underperforming codeshare partner (sorry WP, love you guys but got to call it a duck if it quacks). You want it done right do it yourself, at least that's what the word on the street seems to be around here. I seem to remember that there was a Star-Advertiser news release that said basically the same thing.

Another aspect some people have mentioned is that since newhires at HAL are seat-locked in type for 2 years, if the prop was on the HAL certificate you would see them hire a bunch for it, then hire another class down the road for the Airbus. So you would have a bunch of ATR pilots senior to A330 pilots. Which would be a nightmare for training when everyone's seat-lock expires and they all bid out and displace each other en-masse. Would be a real disaster. With the strong scope language in place, and the reasons they have given for doing this (try Google the Star-Advertiser articles) it may work out pretty well, really.

Last edited by HighTailN2Pipes; 10-27-2012 at 02:01 AM.
HighTailN2Pipes is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 09:21 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,474
Default

I"ve heard a few reasons for the props. One is to serve the customers from the Asian markets with seamless and reliable service. Also with the Maui hub starting the feed for the mainland flights makes sense.
Rama is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 02:07 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chazbird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: Fifth floor, window
Posts: 290
Default

I've got ATR time and a ATR type and I'd love a PIC gig in Hawaii (or get on with HAL itself). To get a possible jump on this I called Hawaiian but didn't get very far, they were nice and did acknowledged its existence. They didn't have any real information (for me) nor a working name.

What do you think the odds are that they will use another certificate holder? There are but three carriers in the US that now fly ATR's (excepting Eagle who'll dump theirs soon). I am not sure I could live in Hawaii (or elsewhere) on the wages the other 3 already pay - and they rightfully would hire/promote from within - I am sure many of those pilots would gladly jump from BFE to Hawaii. If they bought and own the airplanes themselves this doesn't necessarily mean they'd have to use their certificate, as two of the other US ATR operators don't own their planes.

Any guesses?
chazbird is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 02:24 PM
  #35  
just past ETP
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Cruise Captain
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by HighTailN2Pipes
I

Another aspect some people have mentioned is that since newhires at HAL are seat-locked in type for 2 years, if the prop was on the HAL certificate you would see them hire a bunch for it, then hire another class down the road for the Airbus. So you would have a bunch of ATR pilots senior to A330 pilots. Which would be a nightmare for training when everyone's seat-lock expires and they all bid out and displace each other en-masse. Would be a real disaster. With the strong scope language in place, and the reasons they have given for doing this (try Google the Star-Advertiser articles) it may work out pretty well, really.
technically right now (until June) there is no seat lock to the airbus.. many 717 FO's are going over right after they finish IOE.

IF the ATR paid a decent rate, especially on the PIC front, there would be plenty of pilots bidding it just to be home every night.
CATIII is offline  
Old 10-27-2012, 11:16 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,474
Default

The ATR will be on a separate certificate. They will probably wet lease initially to get it going and then fly on a Hal certificate when its approved.
It will be on a separate seniority list.
Rama is offline  
Old 10-28-2012, 06:59 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer
Maybe they're going to buy the Comair certificate from Delta??
Comair's separation agreement basically says the pilots go with the certificate.
Boomer is offline  
Old 10-28-2012, 08:51 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Beaver Hunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 294
Default

I departed Island air in 96. Didn't realize they had gone down hill that far.
I have always believed a very well run big TP operation would do very well in Hawaii. It really is the ideal market for TPs.
I agree, I don't like to do business with unreliable operators.

Cheers
Beaver Hunter is offline  
Old 10-29-2012, 12:55 AM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Rama
The ATR will be on a separate certificate. They will probably wet lease initially to get it going and then fly on a Hal certificate when its approved.
How can you "wet lease" when you already own the airplanes yourself?

Hawaiian Airlines parent buys aircraft for future service to Lanai, Molokai - Pacific Business News

Try doing an aircraft registration search of "N801HC". Recognize that owner's street address? If the plan is to start later next year, like the articles say, they have PLENTY of time to hire people, etc.
HighTailN2Pipes is offline  
Old 11-02-2012, 09:14 PM
  #40  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ 900, FO
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by CATIII
technically right now (until June) there is no seat lock to the airbus.. many 717 FO's are going over right after they finish IOE.

IF the ATR paid a decent rate, especially on the PIC front, there would be plenty of pilots bidding it just to be home every night.
But I doubt it will be comparable pay yeah? Probably similar to what Island Air is paying their pilots?
mauidanielle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FL410
Regional
16
05-15-2015 01:54 PM
EWRflyr
Major
14
10-10-2010 10:37 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
UND_Sioux
Regional
133
02-27-2010 02:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices