Council 81 Letter
#21
Carl
#22
A clearly non-concessionary TA would not require such "encouragement", especially considering the carpet bombing we've already received.
Like Alfa's posts, the wordier the text, the more obtuse the point. The goal of such great walls of text is to generally fog the mind, obscure poor reasoning, and goes through great fulminations trying to convince the already convinced.
Nu
Like Alfa's posts, the wordier the text, the more obtuse the point. The goal of such great walls of text is to generally fog the mind, obscure poor reasoning, and goes through great fulminations trying to convince the already convinced.
Nu
#24
Sorry to disrupt your non stop string of worthless comments sprinkled with McCarthyesque character assassinations with no basis other than your own imaginations. With the complete lack of integrity and your baseless accusations, you have no basis to act all high and mighty when someone actually tries to give true facts and information.
The sample polling must not show the results you all were hoping for.
#27
Nope. Just looking at the different polls. Haven't seen one yet that has it passing.
Of course they are unscientific, but arguably a decent cross sample.
Did go over the TA on a long leg a couple of days ago and showed a guy who was in favor of it where his information he processed was suspect.
After another day of q and a and referencing the TA he became an against voter.
Of course they are unscientific, but arguably a decent cross sample.
Did go over the TA on a long leg a couple of days ago and showed a guy who was in favor of it where his information he processed was suspect.
After another day of q and a and referencing the TA he became an against voter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post