TA 2012 Contract Highlights
06-16-2012, 09:27 AM
#61
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
80, which nnp is it?
06-16-2012, 09:30 AM
#62
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Scope.
Page 2, paragraph 1, line 1:
"The tentative agreement allows Delta earlier access to an additional 70 76-seat aircraft,
but only if they first add to the mainline fleet 88 SNB aircraft (recently identified by the
Company as B-717s)."
That sure doesn't look truthful...
Page 2, paragraph 1, line 1:
"The tentative agreement allows Delta earlier access to an additional 70 76-seat aircraft,
but only if they first add to the mainline fleet 88 SNB aircraft (recently identified by the
Company as B-717s)."
That sure doesn't look truthful...
06-16-2012, 10:17 AM
#63
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
This is directly from the NNP......
The tentative agreement allows Delta earlier access to an additional 70 76-seat aircraft, but only if they first add to the mainline fleet 88 SNB aircraft (recently identified by the Company as B-717s).*
I don't see where it says ALL 88 SNB aircraft must be delivered before ANY 76 seaters are allowed. It says the company must first add 88 SNB aircraft before they may have access to ALL 70 76 seat aircraft. That is a true statement. In order for the company to have ALL 70 76 seaters, they must first take delivery of ALL 88 SNB aircraft.
I'm sorry for the all caps words. I just feel they're key. Are you seeing different?
06-16-2012, 10:21 AM
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Scope.
Page 2, paragraph 1, line 1:
"The tentative agreement allows Delta earlier access to an additional 70 76-seat aircraft,
but only if they first add to the mainline fleet 88 SNB aircraft (recently identified by the
Company as B-717s)."
That sure doesn't look truthful...
Page 2, paragraph 1, line 1:
"The tentative agreement allows Delta earlier access to an additional 70 76-seat aircraft,
but only if they first add to the mainline fleet 88 SNB aircraft (recently identified by the
Company as B-717s)."
That sure doesn't look truthful...
06-16-2012, 10:22 AM
#65
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
I agree- and I'm not the one that was duped by it, Lumberg was.
That's what started all this- trying to figure out a. where he got that statement and b. what the truth is.
They have to get 88 717s or they won't get any of the 70 76 seaters. It states that in the TA. Most of the 30 MD90s are already here in the States. Since you fly your 744s to Manilla and don't go to Greensboro or Indianapolis much, you wouldn't know about that. A bunch of them are sitting, waiting to get mods right now.
That's what started all this- trying to figure out a. where he got that statement and b. what the truth is.
Last edited by 80ktsClamp; 06-16-2012 at 10:33 AM.
06-16-2012, 12:48 PM
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Once they hit 214 76 seat airframes the 1:1.56 MBH radio engages, so 222 76's will still trigger the 1:1.56.
Wrt removal provisions:
1.B.46.f.7
4.6 50 seat aircraft for each 76 seat aircraft added.
So in your "69 aircraft purchase scenario" the rounded number would be 5, therefore the 50 seat cap would be 130.
06-16-2012, 12:59 PM
#67
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
1.D.9.b
Once they hit 214 76 seat airframes the 1:1.56 MBH radio engages, so 222 76's will still trigger the 1:1.56.
Wrt removal provisions:
1.B.46.f.7
4.6 50 seat aircraft for each 76 seat aircraft added.
So in your "69 aircraft purchase scenario" the rounded number would be 5, therefore the 50 seat cap would be 130.
Once they hit 214 76 seat airframes the 1:1.56 MBH radio engages, so 222 76's will still trigger the 1:1.56.
Wrt removal provisions:
1.B.46.f.7
4.6 50 seat aircraft for each 76 seat aircraft added.
So in your "69 aircraft purchase scenario" the rounded number would be 5, therefore the 50 seat cap would be 130.
06-17-2012, 05:39 AM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 777 Sim Instructor
Posts: 745
Just voted yes, end of discussion.
06-17-2012, 06:34 AM
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
The small and large end Scope is just not enough. I voted "No".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
