Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
The Many Reasons a Delta Captain Votes NO >

The Many Reasons a Delta Captain Votes NO

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

The Many Reasons a Delta Captain Votes NO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2012, 07:21 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Even at 2 billion over 5 years, the TA improvements are worth around $400 million per year going into the bank accounts of Delta Pilots. That is a real transfer of Delta income from other entities to us.

Add that we get back to the table in LESS than 3 years working on getting more per the amendable date PLUS getting to reopen negotiations when FTDT is finalized.

FDX is solidly profitable, what kind of gains did they get on the last two rounds of negotiations?
shiznit is offline  
Old 06-10-2012, 07:29 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,030
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Even at 2 billion over 5 years, the TA improvements are worth around $400 million per year going into the bank accounts of Delta Pilots. That is a real transfer of Delta income from other entities to us.

Add that we get back to the table in LESS than 3 years working on getting more per the amendable date PLUS getting to reopen negotiations when FTDT is finalized.

FDX is solidly profitable, what kind of gains did they get on the last two rounds of negotiations?
We don't think we will have any leverage in 3 years. We are using it all now for gains that are not acceptable for the long term.
hockeypilot44 is online now  
Old 06-10-2012, 08:07 AM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Fat Jesus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit

Add that we get back to the table in LESS than 3 years working on getting more per the amendable date PLUS getting to reopen negotiations when FTDT is finalized.
The OP's point though, is that the "bird-in-the-hand" is the leverage DAL pilots hold now. If the TA is ratified, you have nothing to use for leverage in three years. You will have solved a massive portion of managements problems for pennies on the dollar, then what are you going to use for negotiating capital?
Fat Jesus is offline  
Old 06-10-2012, 08:29 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
asupilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by Fat Jesus
The OP's point though, is that the "bird-in-the-hand" is the leverage DAL pilots hold now. If the TA is ratified, you have nothing to use for leverage in three years. You will have solved a massive portion of managements problems for pennies on the dollar, then what are you going to use for negotiating capital?
Here's some interesting analysis about the "bird-in-the-hand" concept. I have posted another file for review.

DepositFiles

Last edited by asupilot; 06-10-2012 at 08:54 AM. Reason: Addition
asupilot is offline  
Old 06-10-2012, 08:46 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
untied's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Seems like a lot has been up to us lately. It sure would be nice if some other groups would step up to the plate, instead of fighting in the dug outs.
We're fighting too.

We declined your current contract due largely to scope issues.

Refusing to take a concessionary contract is fighting.

Accepting one crappy deal after another is not.
untied is offline  
Old 06-10-2012, 09:38 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Fat Jesus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by asupilot
Here's some interesting analysis about the "bird-in-the-hand" concept. I have posted another file for review.

DepositFiles
Can't download. Can you copy/paste or post a summary?
Fat Jesus is offline  
Old 06-10-2012, 09:48 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by untied
We're fighting too.

We declined your current contract due largely to scope issues.

Refusing to take a concessionary contract is fighting.

Accepting one crappy deal after another is not.
I still don't see how capping outsourcing, cutting 1500 RJ pilot jobs, and increasing the pilot share of the company spending "pie" by $400 million per year(on average) is concessionary.

It will cost UCAL 750-800 million per year in gains to match it (plus about 350-400 more pilots added). Let us know when you get that done.

And good luck getting released with an embattled first term president from Chicago at the helm, genius idea....

Oh, and your MEC turned it down because it lacked all the important good parts of the DAL PWA... Rates don't tell the story...
shiznit is offline  
Old 06-10-2012, 09:59 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Fat Jesus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
I still don't see how capping outsourcing, cutting 1500 RJ pilot jobs, and increasing the pilot share of the company spending "pie" by $400 million per year(on average) is concessionary.

It will cost UCAL 750-800 million per year in gains to match it (plus about 350-400 more pilots added). Let us know when you get that done.

And good luck getting released with an embattled first term president from Chicago at the helm, genius idea....

Oh, and your MEC turned it down because it lacked all the important good parts of the DAL PWA... Rates don't tell the story...
Stop comparing it to UCAL and look at your own house, and what you can do for you. While you don't see it as concessionary, that $400m going to the pilots is actually saving the company $2.5b in 50 seater costs, while at the same time being partially funded with a decrease in profit sharing. It's a shell game, you're partially paying for your own raise. Company comes out much further ahead than you, while at the same time plusing up the number of large RJ's. In three years, DAL mgmt's mistakes will have been purged by your hard work, not theirs. What will you use to negotiate then? You may like the current TA, but you've got the leverage to make much more significant changes. Never mind the fact that a no vote slams the door forever on 900's (huge!).

For the record, I have no dog in this fight, just a guy watching from the sidelines hoping to join your team.
Fat Jesus is offline  
Old 06-10-2012, 10:02 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by orvil
Here is a possible confirmation to the above quoted post.

http://www.aerospace.bombardier.com/...ram_Status.pdf

It comes from the Bombardier website. It confirms 11 pending deliveries of the CRJ 900.

Why would there ONLY be 11 orders? Maybe other airlines ordered them? Let's look at Wikipedia.... Also, isnt' the CRK (CRJ1000) line open? That one just got a boat load of orders from Garuda in Indonesia. All the CRK is is a stretched CR9. I would think they could keep the line open if needed. That's like a 737-900 and a 737-800.


Operators


A comparison between Bombardier CRJ700 (top) and CRJ900 (bottom)
Further information: List of Bombardier CRJ operators

As of July 2010, 316 CRJ700 aircraft (all variants) and 229 CRJ900 aircraft (all variants) were in airline service. Operators for these aircraft are SkyWest Airlines (104), Mesa Airlines (58), Atlantic Southeast Airlines (49), Mesaba Airlines (41), Lufthansa CityLine (32), Comair (28), American Eagle Airlines (25), GoJet Airlines (25), Air Canada Jazz (16), Pinnacle Airlines (14) Pluna (12), and other operators with fewer aircraft of the type.[1]

[edit] Orders and deliveries



Model Series

Orders

Deliveries

Unfilled


CRJ900

268

257

11





Grand Total

663

611

52


Bombardier data as of March 31, 2012.[2]

[edit] Latest orders



Date

Type

Customer

Orders

Options

Notes



25 April 2011

CRJ900

PLUNA

3

3




15 November 2011

CRJ900

Petroleum Air Services

1

1




9 February 2012

CRJ900

China Express Airlines

6
5



19 March 2012

CRJ900
Rwandair
2
2


Looks like China Express Airlines and Rwandair have some unfilled orders. I think Iraqi Air also ordered some. Let's find out?



From IRAQ Air at Wikipedia:

2012
In February 2012, Iraqi Airways announced that they will resume flights to India. From Baghdad four times a week, two flight each to Delhi and Mumbai starting from March and May respectively.[19]
In April 2012, several news agencies announced that Iraqi Airways will receive 40 new Boeing aircrafts, 30 737-800 and 10 787. The first airplanes will be delivered in December 2012.[20]
In April 2012, news agencies announced that Iraqi Airways will receive the remaining 4 Bombardier CRJ-900 in the coming months

Last edited by Bill Lumberg; 06-10-2012 at 10:15 AM.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 06-10-2012, 10:10 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by untied
We're fighting too.

We declined your current contract due largely to scope issues.

Refusing to take a concessionary contract is fighting.

Accepting one crappy deal after another is not.
You are INFIGHTING more than you are fighting with your company. You could have helped everyone with pattern bargaining had you come together with your other half.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
norskman2
Regional
18
07-18-2011 02:26 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices