Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Negotiating Environment - Feeling Lucky? >

Negotiating Environment - Feeling Lucky?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Negotiating Environment - Feeling Lucky?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2012, 11:03 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Fessional
Deflection?? Here's what he had to add to the discussion:



Do you have something intelligent to add to the conversation?

Someone who is calling an individual a "doofus" is in absolutely no position to be demanding "something intelligent."

I stick to my point. You are the proverbial pot calling the kettle black.
APCLurker is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 11:34 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by APCLurker
Someone who is calling an individual a "doofus" is in absolutely no position to be demanding "something intelligent."

I stick to my point. You are the proverbial pot calling the kettle black.
No demanding here. Just asking if you have something to add. Obviously you don't.
Pro Fessional is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 02:12 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Care to back that up with FACTS?
Company came wanting something in good times and found DALPA would settle quickly and for little. A YES vote shows DALPA ineffective, passive, naive and conditioned to fail; having learned this the reasonable objective at next "contract negotiation" is to gut and gill DALPA.

This would be my assessment and objective were I wearing a management hat and that is a FACT.
texavia is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 02:25 PM
  #44  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by texavia
Company came wanting something in good times and found DALPA would settle quickly and for little. A YES vote shows DALPA ineffective, passive, naive and conditioned to fail; having learned this the reasonable objective at next "contract negotiation" is to gut and gill DALPA.

This would be my assessment and objective were I wearing a management hat and that is a FACT.
Actually, that is nothing more then your opinion. There are zero facts in your statement.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 02:28 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Actually, that is nothing more then your opinion. There are zero facts in your statement.
Naive much?
texavia is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 02:32 PM
  #46  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by texavia
Naive much?
I see. You provide zero facts. I call you out on it, and your only rebuttal is that I'm naive. Good one. Your statement has no facts in it. Your assessment of the TA being "weak" is your opinion. Your assessment of DALPA bring "ineffective" is your opinion. Do yourself favor and come back when you actually have facts.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 02:36 PM
  #47  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Not a pro or con discussion item, but what if the TA is voted down?
scambo1 is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 02:40 PM
  #48  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I see. You provide zero facts. I call you out on it, and your only rebuttal is that I'm naive. Good one. Your statement has no facts in it. Your assessment of the TA being "weak" is your opinion. Your assessment of DALPA bring "ineffective" is your opinion. Do yourself favor and come back when you actually have facts.
If you think management plays the game any different than I posted you're a little past naive.
texavia is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 02:44 PM
  #49  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by texavia
If you think management plays the game any different than I posted you're a little past naive.
Strike 3. A statement once again lacking fact, laced with nothing but your opinion.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-02-2012, 02:45 PM
  #50  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Not a pro or con discussion item, but what if the TA is voted down?
Openers will be exchanged, and we will start over.
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Opposing View
Cargo
62
03-07-2011 04:55 PM
Micro
Cargo
68
01-23-2008 07:22 AM
Falconjet
Cargo
4
09-21-2007 06:59 AM
fedupbusdriver
Cargo
2
07-30-2007 11:16 AM
MACH84
Cargo
55
09-30-2006 06:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices