Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
WN/FL merger not going as planned, eh? >

WN/FL merger not going as planned, eh?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

WN/FL merger not going as planned, eh?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2012, 08:04 PM
  #21  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
quick question, is assigned seating required or not for international?

people have said it is but others swear it's not.

anybody know? is that the hang up?
I have also heard that assigned seating is required for int'l. I dont know if it is or not.

I know positive bag match is required for international and the assigned seat may be the system used for positive bag match.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 08:49 PM
  #22  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
I have also heard that assigned seating is required for int'l. I dont know if it is or not.

I know positive bag match is required for international and the assigned seat may be the system used for positive bag match.
Better let AT handle the bags! They do fly free on SWA but seem to go by taxi or boat or something just not on the flight, too spensive!
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 10:25 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
Better let AT handle the bags! They do fly free on SWA but seem to go by taxi or boat or something just not on the flight, too spensive!
I guess indeed it is all relative. We are definitely not by any stretch of the imagination leading the pack, but considering the fact that we do not charge for checked baggage you have to agree we probably carry more checked bags per passenger as compared to carry ons versus airlines that charge for checked bags.

Analyzing Data about Lost Baggage: It’s All Relative (Frequency) Monday, August 29, 2011 by Patrick Runkel

Notice the larger airlines now fare much better. For example, US Airways was in the bottom 5 for mishandled baggage based solely on frequency counts (top chart). But taking into account passenger volume (bottom chart) it’s now in the top 5, with one of the lowest rates of mishandled baggage for the month.You might think it’s an obvious point, yet misleading charts of frequency counts are very common in newspapers and magazines, especially in the ubiquitous “top 10” and “top 5” lists.


shoelu is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 10:31 PM
  #24  
Da Hudge
Thread Starter
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

I see your charts, shoelu, and raise you this (along with the pile of flights that you can't codeshare... and that yall are still way down in the pack regardless of what chart you choose):

80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 10:35 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I see your charts, shoelu, and raise you this (along with the pile of flights that you can't codeshare):

I think you are missing the point 80, I'm ecstatic we can't codeshare, you should look into it.
shoelu is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 10:39 PM
  #26  
Da Hudge
Thread Starter
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu
I think you are missing the point 80, I'm ecstatic we can't codeshare, you should look into it.
can't codeshare.... with who you're merging (merged...) with? I think you're missing the point.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 11:08 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
can't codeshare.... with who you're merging (merged...) with? I think you're missing the point.
Yes, that's right we don't know how to codeshare. Even when we attempt to provide a seamless transition to the recently acquired subsidiary we are behind the power curve concerning tying up our networks. The alternative is being so familiar with selling another airlines code that it is an easy transition. From my perspective I would rather learn a new skill than be intimately familiar with outsourcing our flying. Maybe your airline is ultimately better ready to handle another merger, but I am quite happy we are in the dark about the intricacies of selling another airlines code. As for now we will simply have to endure all our profits going to the coffers of one or the other airlines currently owned by Southwest.
shoelu is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 04:46 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FedElta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Retired, again...
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu
Yes, that's right we don't know how to codeshare. Even when we attempt to provide a seamless transition to the recently acquired subsidiary we are behind the power curve concerning tying up our networks. The alternative is being so familiar with selling another airlines code that it is an easy transition. From my perspective I would rather learn a new skill than be intimately familiar with outsourcing our flying. Maybe your airline is ultimately better ready to handle another merger, but I am quite happy we are in the dark about the intricacies of selling another airlines code. As for now we will simply have to endure all our profits going to the coffers of one or the other airlines currently owned by Southwest.
Hey 80.......much as it pains me,.......point to shoelu.....but, well fought !

Regards,
BG
FedElta is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 06:23 AM
  #29  
Get's Every Day Off
 
ExAF's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by FedElta
Hey 80.......much as it pains me,.......point to shoelu.....but, well fought !

Regards,
BG
+1...NOBODY at DAL has any room to tout their IT prowess.
ExAF is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 06:40 AM
  #30  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by ExAF
+1...NOBODY at DAL has any room to tout their IT prowess.
Yeah that is true true!! Hate the fact the 737NG ( has that No Good ) over head panel. A depressing airplane when compared to the Old 757's. Wish Boeing had not drank the SWA cool aid!
FIIGMO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
SD3Dog
Mergers and Acquisitions
142
03-04-2009 06:15 AM
SWAjet
Major
8
03-26-2008 05:00 AM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
1
10-14-2006 03:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices