Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Stupid Takeoff Briefs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2006, 11:18 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JollyF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 318
Default True Dat

Originally Posted by Jetjok
It's nice that some of us don't take things to extremes. Every situation can't be accounted for and nobody wants them to be. What happens if two engines fall off their mounts on rotation? Try to use common sense. Don't **** and moan, get into management and change what you don't like about your companys' way of flying. Or, check out as Captain and do it the way you want.
Jetjok is spot on in my opinion. "Standards" are extremely important when you are dead ass tired at 0400 and things don't go exactly the way you planned. You can't possibly have everything covered in the book, but that's we earn our pay.
JollyF15 is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 11:32 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

It was printed before, but this is hands down the BEST take off brief.

Yo, check dis. If sh1t go down before we be fas, we gonna be jammin' da skids, ahight?

If sh1t go down afta we be fas, we aint gonna do nutin till 'celeration height. Afta dat, we gonna clean up an floss n' fly dis mofo back arown fo da west siiiide. You down?

Last edited by dojetdriver; 10-23-2006 at 01:45 PM.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 11:39 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JollyF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 318
Default I wif you

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
It was printed before, but this is hands down the BEST take off brief.

Yo, check dis. If sh1t go down before we be fas, we gonna be jammin' da skids, ahight?

If sh1t go down afta we be fas, we aint gonna do nutin till acceleration height. Afta dat, we gonna clean up an floss n' fly dis mofo back arown fo da west siiiide. You down?
No dats some mad crunk my brotha!
JollyF15 is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 11:42 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel 10
The captains I fly with that are the most competent usually have the best takeoff briefings in my experience. The most anal capts go on and on. So I totally know where you're coming from, James.
Another good example of theory vs. practice. An anal captain will be more concerned with following the on-paper procedure of giving a briefing, while the more practical (read: competent) will be more concerned with its practical use, keeping it short and concise, and in a style geared towards a human being, rather than a robot.
Uncle Bose is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 12:05 PM
  #25  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok

They pay me a very good salary, train me on great equipment, and tell me how they want me to operate their aircraft. The least I could do is to do it the way they ask. If you don't like that, do it the way you want, at your own risk.

This guidance is spot on... almost. If you don't like the way the company asks you to do it, do it anyway. If you're so inclined, use processes available to you to have the procedures changed. If you can't hack that, quit.



Jetjok,

Your quote of the FOM is just one example of how to standardize the briefings. Ironically, though, the briefings vary wildly between fleets. Additional guidance in the CFMs about the briefings is not standard. For example, in the MD-11, with the First Officer flying and none of the special procedures, restrictions, or abnormals, the Captain could say "Your leg" and be done. (Well, the line about "Review Company airport specific pages" has been added, so he has to do that now.) He doesn't have to even say "Standard FedEx Procedures," because that would be redundant.

In "the Boeing", on the other hand, it is Standard Procedure to say "Standard Procedures". It seems kind of redundant to me, but like you said, you do it the way The Company wants it to be done. It seems further redundant to me to then go on to state procedures that are part of the Standard Procedures (my reject, you handle the radios, advise about the dump, blah, blah, blah...).


Here's my take. Do what the procedures require. Keep it as brief as possible. Make sure you still have everyone's attention at the end, and end it with the most important stuff, the stuff we'll be doing next. I'm required to brief the page number and effective date of the departure procedure if I'm the pilot flying, but what I want to end with is, "Runway heading, initially climbing to 5,000". That's the part that really counts.





.
TonyC is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 12:59 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Amen! And I agree with you that although the FOM addresses "standards", there is disparity amongst our fleet. Interestingly enough, I find the Boeing the most non-standard of all our jets except the DC-10, of which I have no knowledge. A number of years ago flight standards began a campaign to standardize, across aircraft type, our training, checklists and procedures. The MadDog and Bus fleet did a good job in this, but the Boeing is still not there, and probably never will be. I believe we need term limits on Flight Management as well as for Standards and the Training Department.
Jetjok is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 01:06 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Bose
Another good example of theory vs. practice. An anal captain will be more concerned with following the on-paper procedure of giving a briefing, while the more practical (read: competent) will be more concerned with its practical use, keeping it short and concise, and in a style geared towards a human being, rather than a robot.
well put bose
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 01:33 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

It should be like a check ride, or a mini skirt. Just barely long enough to cover everything but short enough to keep you interested.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 09:28 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fecav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 675
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
This guidance is spot on... almost. If you don't like the way the company asks you to do it, do it anyway. If you're so inclined, use processes available to you to have the procedures changed. If you can't hack that, quit.



Jetjok,

Your quote of the FOM is just one example of how to standardize the briefings. Ironically, though, the briefings vary wildly between fleets. Additional guidance in the CFMs about the briefings is not standard. For example, in the MD-11, with the First Officer flying and none of the special procedures, restrictions, or abnormals, the Captain could say "Your leg" and be done. (Well, the line about "Review Company airport specific pages" has been added, so he has to do that now.) He doesn't have to even say "Standard FedEx Procedures," because that would be redundant.

In "the Boeing", on the other hand, it is Standard Procedure to say "Standard Procedures". It seems kind of redundant to me, but like you said, you do it the way The Company wants it to be done. It seems further redundant to me to then go on to state procedures that are part of the Standard Procedures (my reject, you handle the radios, advise about the dump, blah, blah, blah...).


Here's my take. Do what the procedures require. Keep it as brief as possible. Make sure you still have everyone's attention at the end, and end it with the most important stuff, the stuff we'll be doing next. I'm required to brief the page number and effective date of the departure procedure if I'm the pilot flying, but what I want to end with is, "Runway heading, initially climbing to 5,000". That's the part that really counts.





.
I usually tell the F/O I'm going to try and kill him and it's his responsibility to prevent it. That pretty much sets the tone for the rest of the flight....Done.
fecav8r is offline  
Old 10-24-2006, 03:26 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 6,009
Default

The best brief a Captain can give is the one contained within his company's operations manual without deviation therefrom. It does not make a difference your company's brief is 2 or 20 lines. It has to be accomplished. Those are the fact of life and the regs. That's how the company, FAA, director of flight standards, check airman, and any other crewmember you fly with expects the brief to be accomplished. Any deviation therefrom undermines training, policy, and procedures. Hey we don't make the rules, we just follow them. Don't forget the old CVR if a situation arises on takeoff. What ever is on the tape can either make or break the day.
captjns is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turtle
Regional
4
04-10-2006 12:48 AM
celloman
Flight Schools and Training
5
04-06-2006 08:07 AM
N6724G
Major
12
03-26-2006 09:52 AM
ERJ135
Hangar Talk
3
01-12-2006 11:22 AM
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
3
11-01-2005 10:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices