Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Another Big Retirement Day at AA 10/1 >

Another Big Retirement Day at AA 10/1

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Another Big Retirement Day at AA 10/1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2011, 06:22 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
...some have coughed it up despite not being anywhere near BK (Alaska).
Enlighten me about this statement. QX has always been a wholly owned subsidiary of the Air Group.
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 06:26 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

My point was that we've (mostly) all allowed outsourcing.

Comair is a wholly owned division of Delta, and so was ASA. It's still about Delta flying being done by pilots not on the Delta seniority. Are Horizon planes flown by Alaska pilots? Isn't Skywest doing some of your lift?

I'm not calling you worse than the rest, just saying you're no different.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 06:29 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Yeah, the SKW stuff is new. Disturbing, too.

Personally, I agree with you. If they're going to paint the planes in AS colors and call them AS flights, then they should be flown by AS pilots. To that end, I wouldn't have a problem with completely dissolving QX and putting them on our list.

Now THAT would be an interesting SLI!
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 06:32 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Couldn't agree more. I wouldn't be agreeable to anything without a pre-nuptial SLI, but I'd be willing to talk about it.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 07:43 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
Default

QX is a bit of a special case... because they're so senior and have a relatively decent contract, they were never really much of a threat to the AS guys. They had 70 seat jets, but never that many of them, they were largely restricted to long thin routes that couldn't support a MD80/737, and now they're gone. Horizon is a smaller airline now than they were 20 years ago.

The Skywest thing, on the other hand, is a fairly major threat. They're much lower cost, and if I'm not mistaken there's no limit to the number of 70 seaters they can fly...is there?
JungleBus is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 07:51 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
X Rated's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD80
Posts: 394
Default

How does any of the above relate to AA?
X Rated is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 07:56 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
QX is a bit of a special case... because they're so senior and have a relatively decent contract, they were never really much of a threat to the AS guys. They had 70 seat jets, but never that many of them, they were largely restricted to long thin routes that couldn't support a MD80/737, and now they're gone. Horizon is a smaller airline now than they were 20 years ago.

The Skywest thing, on the other hand, is a fairly major threat. They're much lower cost, and if I'm not mistaken there's no limit to the number of 70 seaters they can fly...is there?
Alaska has according to APC 106 aircraft, QX had 25 CRJ700. I would say 25% is a fairly good size, wheras AA has 626 aircraft according to APC an AE has 47 CRJ700 that equal to 8%.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:29 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
upndsky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Bebe Bus De L'Air Assistant Aerial Conveyance Facilitator
Posts: 351
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
QX is a bit of a special case... because they're so senior and have a relatively decent contract, they were never really much of a threat to the AS guys. They had 70 seat jets, but never that many of them, they were largely restricted to long thin routes that couldn't support a MD80/737, and now they're gone. Horizon is a smaller airline now than they were 20 years ago.

The Skywest thing, on the other hand, is a fairly major threat. They're much lower cost, and if I'm not mistaken there's no limit to the number of 70 seaters they can fly...is there?


At one point, they had at least 22 of these. You may want to revise your comment.
upndsky is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:57 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 534
Default

We should all model B6 in this regard. All of their E-190s are flown by B6 pilots with Industry leading pay for the 100 Seat (E-190) category. Now the legacies need to do the same, but make the seat cutoff lower for mainline flying, like say 50 seats.

And I know this may be a tough pill to swallow, but the legacies may have to accept some SLI similar to Frontier/Republic to make the scope protection happen. Personally, I think we should suck up the SLI with mainline/regional and endure the short term pain associated, (this includes you DELTA guys) to protect scope in the long run.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:58 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by upndsky


At one point, they had at least 22 of these. You may want to revise your comment.
I believe they were also a stand-alone carrier when they operated these, thus no different that United or Delta in that respect.
eaglefly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pinchanickled
Regional
32
12-31-2009 09:49 AM
majortom546
Military
40
07-09-2009 06:41 PM
Hornetguy
Fractional
2
02-26-2007 12:21 PM
SkyHigh
Major
88
11-19-2006 09:20 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices