Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
JetBlue Pilots Reject ALPA >

JetBlue Pilots Reject ALPA

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

JetBlue Pilots Reject ALPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2011, 05:10 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 62
Default JetBlue Pilots Reject ALPA

WSJ UPDATE: JetBlue Pilots Reject Unionization For Second Time
16/08/2011 20:21 | JetBlue Airways Corporation

By Susan Carey
Of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

The nonunion pilots at JetBlue Airways Corp. (JBLU) voted down union representation for the second time in two years, rejecting the big Air Line Pilots Association union in balloting that concluded Tuesday, JetBlue said.

Of the 2,050 aviators who participated in the election, 1,193, or 58%, rejected ALPA. JetBlue said 834 pilots, or 41%, voted to join the union and 23 pilots wrote in other choices for union representation.

(This story and related background material will be available on The Wall Street Journal website, WSJ.com.)

JetBlue, an entirely nonunion discount carrier based in Forest Hills, N.Y., had campaigned to retain its current model of direct relationships with employees, claiming that collaboration brings better results than the traditional industry negotiation model. ALPA, an AFL-CIO member, represents pilots at United Continental Holdings Inc. (UAL), Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL), Alaska Air Group Inc. (ALK) and some smaller carriers. ALPA had no immediate comment on the election results Tuesday.

Efforts by an independent pilot union to organize JetBlue's then 1,800 pilots in 2009 fell short when only 33% of the eligible voters cast ballots, well short of the then simple majority needed for the election to count. Since then, the National Mediation Board, the federal agency that oversees labor relations in the airline and railroad industries, has changed its rules. Unions can be formed if a majority of votes are cast in their favor, even if the turnout is small. That controversial rule change, which some Republicans charge reflects "a partisan policy agenda" at the NMB, was expected to make it easier for ALPA to prevail.

JetBlue pilots have individual five-year, automatically renewing employment contracts with the carrier. The airline has never furloughed aviators or cut their pay, steps many other airlines have taken when they faced financial pressure.

-By Susan Carey, The Wall Street Journal; 312-750-4134
There is line is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 05:25 PM
  #2  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by There is line
WSJ UPDATE: JetBlue Pilots Reject Unionization For Second Time
16/08/2011 20:21 | JetBlue Airways Corporation

By Susan Carey
Of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

The nonunion pilots at JetBlue Airways Corp. (JBLU) voted down union representation for the second time in two years, rejecting the big Air Line Pilots Association union in balloting that concluded Tuesday, JetBlue said.

Of the 2,050 aviators who participated in the election, 1,193, or 58%, rejected ALPA. JetBlue said 834 pilots, or 41%, voted to join the union and 23 pilots wrote in other choices for union representation.

(This story and related background material will be available on The Wall Street Journal website, WSJ.com.)

JetBlue, an entirely nonunion discount carrier based in Forest Hills, N.Y., had campaigned to retain its current model of direct relationships with employees, claiming that collaboration brings better results than the traditional industry negotiation model. ALPA, an AFL-CIO member, represents pilots at United Continental Holdings Inc. (UAL), Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL), Alaska Air Group Inc. (ALK) and some smaller carriers. ALPA had no immediate comment on the election results Tuesday.

Efforts by an independent pilot union to organize JetBlue's then 1,800 pilots in 2009 fell short when only 33% of the eligible voters cast ballots, well short of the then simple majority needed for the election to count. Since then, the National Mediation Board, the federal agency that oversees labor relations in the airline and railroad industries, has changed its rules. Unions can be formed if a majority of votes are cast in their favor, even if the turnout is small. That controversial rule change, which some Republicans charge reflects "a partisan policy agenda" at the NMB, was expected to make it easier for ALPA to prevail.

JetBlue pilots have individual five-year, automatically renewing employment contracts with the carrier. The airline has never furloughed aviators or cut their pay, steps many other airlines have taken when they faced financial pressure.

-By Susan Carey, The Wall Street Journal; 312-750-4134

Susan needs to mention that many 'other' carriers have existed for 80+ years. JetBlue has been around for less then 15 years.

Anyways, 2nd time ALPA has been voted down. Good Luck guys.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 05:36 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Blue fifi flogger
Posts: 738
Default

I'm disgusted and disappointed with over 1100 of my so-called "peers". Sorry to the rest of the profession that 2300 plus of us are going to continue to freeload.
aewanabe is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 05:36 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Susan needs to mention that many 'other' carriers have existed for 80+ years. JetBlue has been around for less then 15 years.

Anyways, 2nd time ALPA has been voted down. Good Luck guys.
Actually, the 1st attempt was JBPA (JetBlue Pilot's Association, i.e. in-house), this was strike one for ALPA. And while I see your point in the longevity of the Legacy carriers, you must give credit to the facts in Susan's statement that JetBlue has never furloughed or cut pay. In-fact, if you were to be "furloughed" at JetBlue, I believe you still receive a 70 hour pay guarantee per the contract. Someone correct me if I am wrong?

I am certainly not saying pay cuts or furloughs will "never happen" at JetBlue, but for none of that to happen in this economy and to survive in a post 9-11 environment, and be profitable, you have to give them some credit.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 05:37 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sennaha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: retired EMB-145 CA
Posts: 115
Default

One failed in-house vote.
One failed ALPA vote.
I think the TWA victory, scared enough to swing the vote.

Many pilots perceive a no vote to ALPA, not a CBA.

Moronic, IMHO.
Sennaha is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:06 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Martin404's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Le'Bus de L'Air
Posts: 392
Default

Never mind.....

Last edited by Martin404; 08-16-2011 at 06:08 PM. Reason: Too much beer!
Martin404 is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:41 PM
  #7  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Anyone who is looking at B6 as an acquisition just gave each other high-fives. You think ATN will fair badly think of what no contract and no union will get ya. I mean that with the most sincerity possible.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:28 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Anyone who is looking at B6 as an acquisition just gave each other high-fives. You think ATN will fair badly think of what no contract and no union will get ya. I mean that with the most sincerity possible.
Wow. Really canadair pilot? You had to go state the obvious and rub those folks who work at JBLU's noses in it? The pilots that voted for ALPA probably really appreciate your comments.

Way to hit them with a partisan remark. JBLU pilots, see this for what it really is, an ALPA zealot who just put his foot into his mouth.

Canadair, I liked you and your views/comments better before you started leaning so far to one side. You used to balanced and insightful. This is just plain ball kicking. I'm disapointed as I thought more of you than this. Very distasteful and offensive. Way to represent us. Thanks.

Last edited by TheManager; 08-16-2011 at 07:43 PM.
TheManager is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:45 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Random JetBlue question:

The APC synopsis says:
"1.09% across the board pay raise except for new-hires"

Explanation please: B-scale, annual cost of living increase that happens every year (indexed to CPI or something?), recent management incentive to show why union isn't needed on property . . . what's the story?

So, for now, JetBlue continues in status quo. Any positive spin out there from, ya' know, the majority of JetBlue pilots who didn't want a union on property? Not looking to start a war, just want to hear 'the other side of the story', other than 'unions are bad, the company has treated us well, I don't need to pay 2% of my paycheck to get nothing in return' - there's got to be a unique perspective out there.
Sniper is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:56 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Terantious's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Beach Bum
Posts: 322
Default

ALPA did nothing productive for my previous company except collect dues, collect money for a merger fund when there was no merger after all and when we asked for our money back they told us to basically get bent.
Terantious is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERJ135
Major
95
02-05-2018 09:14 AM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
Jettubby
Mergers and Acquisitions
14
04-03-2008 06:56 AM
Noleone
Regional
7
09-21-2007 07:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices