AA Pilot beaten by removed passengers.
#33
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 501
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: retired
Posts: 567
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Personally, I think the name of the game is self-defense. If the pilot or F/A decided to use a weapon to inflict injury or harm to the attacker, then the line between defense and offense may become blurred in the eyes of the court. Now as to what constitutes a weapon, that can be defined in many ways, but once either defender or attacker decides to use a weapon during a confrontation the stakes rise as do the consequences.
My question is if the pilot/FA who was attacked in this case decided to punch or kick the assailants in this case would they be within their legal right and protected by both the company and the law?
I would think so, but I defer to anyone with a better understanding of the law in this case.
My question is if the pilot/FA who was attacked in this case decided to punch or kick the assailants in this case would they be within their legal right and protected by both the company and the law?
I would think so, but I defer to anyone with a better understanding of the law in this case.
#36
If this belligerent passenger is doing something to me that will possibly prevent me from flying again (i.e., damage my eye, etc.) I will defend myself by any means necessary and worry about the legal consequences later. Great to hear that some "Able-Bodied Passengers" actually came out & restrained these two morons.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
If this belligerent passenger is doing something to me that will possibly prevent me from flying again (i.e., damage my eye, etc.) I will defend myself by any means necessary and worry about the legal consequences later. Great to hear that some "Able-Bodied Passengers" actually came out & restrained these two morons.
There was a case back when I was growing up where two guys robbed a jewelry store, and while one of the robbers was making a break for it he tripped over a display and crashed through a glass window. Believe it or not, the robber, though convicted, was able to file a liability lawsuit against the store and won a good amount of money from it.
Personally, I think in this case the crew should have removed themselves from the situation, and just had law enforcement handle it.
#38
Agreed, and I'm not advocating to start worrying about the "law" in the heat of things when you are being attacked, I'm just curious as to what would happen next. Personally, I think once an individual takes it upon themselves to break the law, attacking an individual, then that perp should have no rights in the eyes of the law. Unfortunately, they still do.
There was a case back when I was growing up where two guys robbed a jewelry store, and while one of the robbers was making a break for it he tripped over a display and crashed through a glass window. Believe it or not, the robber, though convicted, was able to file a liability lawsuit against the store and won a good amount of money from it.
Personally, I think in this case the crew should have removed themselves from the situation, and just had law enforcement handle it.
There was a case back when I was growing up where two guys robbed a jewelry store, and while one of the robbers was making a break for it he tripped over a display and crashed through a glass window. Believe it or not, the robber, though convicted, was able to file a liability lawsuit against the store and won a good amount of money from it.
Personally, I think in this case the crew should have removed themselves from the situation, and just had law enforcement handle it.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
However, if it's one on one the gloves come off and any attack on either one of these scumbags can be defined as self-defense in my opinion.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post