Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Why Layovers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2006, 05:06 AM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by B757200ER
At least we don't have to re-fuel inflight, eh?
Don't give them any ideas...the last thing I want to see is BDL-PDX in a CRJ ...

Last edited by Pharaoh; 09-15-2006 at 05:13 AM.
Pharaoh is offline  
Old 09-15-2006, 05:18 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 737FO
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
Sit down with a pencil and build a real schedule...it will become obvious that you can't run an airline without layovers.
I used to do that when I was a kid.
check6 is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 06:18 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BCDurbin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: 717 FO >>>> 737 FO
Posts: 295
Default

Unless you have ALOT of bases you can't bring all your aircraft back to a Base. And alot of times it's cheaper to overnight an aircraft at a smaller airport than at a Hub.
BCDurbin is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 06:42 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PILOTGUY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Posts: 522
Default

I LOVE hotels!!! Superlong showers....at no cost to me. A/C whereever you want it. New towns to explore, etc. I also like being away from my wife for 2 or 3 days.....might be why the honeymoon has not stopped after 11 years.
PILOTGUY is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 06:52 PM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,044
Default

Originally Posted by PILOTGUY
I LOVE hotels!!! Superlong showers....at no cost to me. A/C whereever you want it. New towns to explore, etc. I also like being away from my wife for 2 or 3 days.....might be why the honeymoon has not stopped after 11 years.
There is something to be said for that...the navy was TOO long, you had to start the whole relationship all over, but 4-5 days is just about right.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-17-2006, 05:11 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JerrySpringer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 747RJ
Posts: 441
Default

Originally Posted by MikeB525
This thought came up when I was talking with a friend today: Why has there always been a tradition of having crews layover at a place away from their base? This is one of the biggest complaints amongst pilots.

So why is it done? Why are pilot schedules designed to have layovers? If you think about it, it costs the airline ALOT of money in hotel costs. To layover a 737 crew you need to rent 5 hotel rooms. If crew schedules were to focus more on day trips and minimize schedules requiring overnights, wouldn't it then be a win-win for both the crews and the company (flightcrew get more nights at home, company saves a ton of money on hotel costs)?

so....?
Certain airlines, like Colgan, do just that. It's called outstation basing. The rub is, you have to live where the airplane lives. Not bad if the plane lives where you do. Follow me? Now, the airplane moves, and you have to move to. More aptly, the comany has to move you. This usually costs more than the hotel rooms they buy.
JerrySpringer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dyvnflyboy
Regional
33
02-10-2006 05:10 AM
CRJammin
Layover
9
08-04-2005 06:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices