Delta Ponders Pilot Sources
#111
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: New to mother D
Posts: 123
If you really want to compare, lets compare us to similar professionals...like medical doctors....
Lets look at why doctors are paid much higher than us? Not because they are more valuable. It is because they have one of the most powerful lobbies in the US. Much more powerful than ALPA. The AMA controls the number of med. school seats in the US and they are very good at controlling supply through various means.
Lets look at why doctors are paid much higher than us? Not because they are more valuable. It is because they have one of the most powerful lobbies in the US. Much more powerful than ALPA. The AMA controls the number of med. school seats in the US and they are very good at controlling supply through various means.
So, a whole new path to a medical profession has exploded in the last 15 with a number of similar effects. While it's harder to get a more prestigious Residency (Surgery, etc.) as a D.O., they have flooded the family practice ranks and have substantially degraded the pay in the family practice market, drastically reducing the income. Yeah, they can't put M.D. behind their name, and in most case they are not the quality candidates their M.D. brothers are, nor did they make it through such a rigorous weeding process... but they get to say they're doctors!
A secondary effect these guys have on the industry- D.O. Schools are substantially more expensive than M.D. schools, which increases the load of their student loans. When they finish training, many of them have to take the first job that comes get cracking on those loans, regardless of pay, etc.
In fact, some jobs once done by medical doctors have been completely undercut. If you get an operation, instead of an Anesthesiologist, you'll likely be put under by a Nurse Anesthetist. A whole career path that used to belong to Medical Doctors is now on it's way to being totally outsourced to less trained and lower paid people who are willing to work for less.
Anyone else see any parallels?
#112
Big picture
The big picture is that the legacy airlines have been in full retreat over the last 30 years. Giants have been ground into dust in that time. One time stalwarts of the industry are merged and shrunk on a continuing basis.
All the while the regionals and low cost carriers take over the industry. Anyone who has 30 or more years ahead of themselves in this profession should have grave concerns about their future.
So far nothing real is on the horizon to suggest that wages or conditions will get better. Airlines have proved that they will go to great lengths to keep downward pressure on wages. It is the only way to get ahead in the modern corporate world. The company with the lowest costs will win.
Skyhigh
All the while the regionals and low cost carriers take over the industry. Anyone who has 30 or more years ahead of themselves in this profession should have grave concerns about their future.
So far nothing real is on the horizon to suggest that wages or conditions will get better. Airlines have proved that they will go to great lengths to keep downward pressure on wages. It is the only way to get ahead in the modern corporate world. The company with the lowest costs will win.
Skyhigh
#113
Can't go back
I like this web site:
What Flying Was Like In The 1960s
It chronicles the glory of airlines past and shows how far we are from the good old days. The author concludes that ticket prices were four times more expensive in the 1960's than today. The only way to significantly raise pilot wages is to bring up ticket prices.
Even a slight increase in prices has a massive effect upon demand. Flying is barely tolerable as it is with TSA and all the hassles that go with flying. In addition there is a lot of competition that the airlines did not have in the 1960s; teleconferencing, the national highway system and a failing economy. Double ticket prices and I believe that passengers will disappear.
Our industry is propagated by $69 ticket prices. An entire generation of Americans are use to jumping on a jet to fly 1000 miles to attend a dinner party. All that will go away with a significant increase in prices and so will go most of the job market for pilots.
Skip the flight to grandmas house and buy her an XBox with Kinect instead. They you can visit all you want for free.
Syhigh
What Flying Was Like In The 1960s
It chronicles the glory of airlines past and shows how far we are from the good old days. The author concludes that ticket prices were four times more expensive in the 1960's than today. The only way to significantly raise pilot wages is to bring up ticket prices.
Even a slight increase in prices has a massive effect upon demand. Flying is barely tolerable as it is with TSA and all the hassles that go with flying. In addition there is a lot of competition that the airlines did not have in the 1960s; teleconferencing, the national highway system and a failing economy. Double ticket prices and I believe that passengers will disappear.
Our industry is propagated by $69 ticket prices. An entire generation of Americans are use to jumping on a jet to fly 1000 miles to attend a dinner party. All that will go away with a significant increase in prices and so will go most of the job market for pilots.
Skip the flight to grandmas house and buy her an XBox with Kinect instead. They you can visit all you want for free.
Syhigh
Last edited by SkyHigh; 04-24-2011 at 08:53 AM.
#114
China Visa Applicant
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,929
I like this web site:
What Flying Was Like In The 1960s
It chronicles the glory of airlines past and shows how far we are from the good old days.
What Flying Was Like In The 1960s
It chronicles the glory of airlines past and shows how far we are from the good old days.
Looks to me like it's always been a completely screwed up career, and the flavor just changes by decade.
#115
Which is why there will be plenty of guys flying overseas. The US doesn't lead in ANY airline pilot category. Not pay, not work rules, not even soft issues like prestige.
The only real benefit in the US is commuting to your job in another state.
The only real benefit in the US is commuting to your job in another state.
#116
50% of pilots are Captains and 50% are FO's. It is reasonable to assume that half a pilots career at a legacy will be in the right seat and the other half in the left seat. I used the average between the two to come up with an annual average wage then multiplied over 30 years. It is inaccurate to only look at top captain wages.
As pilots we are seduced by the promise of the 20 year captain salary. The reality is that those years comprise only a small portion of ones career. The rest is in much lower ranks of income. The entire career needs to be evaluated.
Ten years in college and as a flight instructor is off set by ten years captain salary at 140K. The average is often less than that of a mailman.
Skyhigh
As pilots we are seduced by the promise of the 20 year captain salary. The reality is that those years comprise only a small portion of ones career. The rest is in much lower ranks of income. The entire career needs to be evaluated.
Ten years in college and as a flight instructor is off set by ten years captain salary at 140K. The average is often less than that of a mailman.
Skyhigh
#117
Not willing to take a paycut for one year for many years of much higher pay? You must be a good pilot because your logic makes for terrible investing...
#118
Guest
Posts: n/a
Good points Whidbey.
One parallel that I see between doctors and pilots is they both have allowed other groups to control their pricing and wages. In both cases, it's the bean counters I'm referring to. One has to only look at the river pilots on the Mississippi River out of New Orleans Crescent River Port Pilots > Home as an example of a work group that maintains extremely rigid, tight control over their industry. In the case of the river pilots, not only do they maintain tight control over their wages, but they also tightly control entry into the field as well. Last time I checked (almost 10 years ago) a river pilot there was taking home roughly $350,000/year for a week on, followed by a week off.
One parallel that I see between doctors and pilots is they both have allowed other groups to control their pricing and wages. In both cases, it's the bean counters I'm referring to. One has to only look at the river pilots on the Mississippi River out of New Orleans Crescent River Port Pilots > Home as an example of a work group that maintains extremely rigid, tight control over their industry. In the case of the river pilots, not only do they maintain tight control over their wages, but they also tightly control entry into the field as well. Last time I checked (almost 10 years ago) a river pilot there was taking home roughly $350,000/year for a week on, followed by a week off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wannabepilot
Flight Schools and Training
34
07-07-2008 12:15 PM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
495
06-28-2008 06:11 PM