Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
DAL early retirement 2009/2011 >

DAL early retirement 2009/2011

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

DAL early retirement 2009/2011

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2011, 07:56 AM
  #291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by LandGreen2
First of all...my third grader asked me to ask you..."why does that man fly a big 747 for only 123/hr?"

I didn't have a good answer...???
You have a gifted third grader. I'd put your third grader and his logic skills up against alfa, slow, PG, sailing and some of the other myopic ALPA acolytes that are fevrent in their certainty all is well.

Maybe we could get him to debate PG on his idea that Delta is not comparable to SWA and consequently we as pilots should not expect to ever be rewarded with an equivilent working agreement.
TheManager is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 08:13 AM
  #292  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,902
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Is it possible the SWA pilots have been making a lot more than we all thought all these years? That AirTran Welcome document was a real eye opener. They are averaging 105 "trips for pay" per month. Their current Captain hourly rate of $210 is quite a bit less than our MD-88 Captain C2K rate of $237. But is it possible they were actually making more money than we were even back then? If they were averaging 105 TFP back in 2004 and their rate was anything close to $210, then they very well may have been averaging quite a bit MORE than our MD-88 Captains were averaging back then. Our MD-88 Captain rate in 2004 was $237. But I'm guessing the average pay was probably based on about 75 hours. Do the math. Maybe the SWA pilots have been laughing all the way to the bank for a lot longer than any of us realized.

And, yes, I do believe they are a "peer." Not in every sense. But they are soon to be our biggest domestic competitor in our biggest hub, ATL. And I see nothing wrong with advocating that our pilots doing comparable flying be paid AT LEAST as much as they are... and then apply that percentage increase to all our other fleets. As far as I'm concerned, that is a bare minimum for me and anything less than that will be an automatic NO vote. Same goes with scope. Any relaxation on scope is an automatic and resounding NO.

Heyas DAL,

Believe it or not, SWA has a LOT of soft time built into their system, which is why they are always in a mad rush, and while they'll defend it to their last breath.

The way their "trip" system works is that it doesn't pay "block or better" until you get to a certain point over shceduled block time, thus eliminating the urge to poke along and encouraging you to get to where you are going. After all, if you aren't going to make extra, you might as well be early, right?

By getting everywhere early, the SWA guys still get their block, and reduce their FAR flight time so they can work their version of the open board, and make even more cash.

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 08:59 AM
  #293  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Heyas DAL,

Believe it or not, SWA has a LOT of soft time built into their system, which is why they are always in a mad rush, and while they'll defend it to their last breath.

The way their "trip" system works is that it doesn't pay "block or better" until you get to a certain point over shceduled block time, thus eliminating the urge to poke along and encouraging you to get to where you are going. After all, if you aren't going to make extra, you might as well be early, right?

By getting everywhere early, the SWA guys still get their block, and reduce their FAR flight time so they can work their version of the open board, and make even more cash.

Nu
Thanks. Got it.

However, that makes it sound like they (SWA guys) are making more because they're working more. But yet the AirTran Welcome document states that the average SWA pilot makes $230K (Captains) and $140K (F/O's), averaging 105 TFP (trips for pay) per month and 18 days off. Hey, I don't mind working hard while I'm at work. Getting $230K annually while averaging 12 days per month to fly a domestic narrowbody sounds like an infinitely better deal (about $100K more per year than I'm currently getting as a DC-9 Captain, and more days off to boot!) than what we currently have at Delta, and possibly even a better deal than we had with C2K. What am I missing?
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 09:03 AM
  #294  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Thanks. Got it.

However, that makes it sound like they (SWA guys) are making more because they're working more. But yet the AirTran Welcome document states that the average SWA pilot makes $230K (Captains) and $140K (F/O's), averaging 105 TFP (trips for pay) per month and 18 days off. Hey, I don't mind working hard while I'm at work. Getting $230K annually while averaging 12 days per month to fly a domestic narrowbody sounds like an infinitely better deal (about $100K more per year than I'm currently getting as a DC-9 Captain, and more days off to boot!) than what we currently have at Delta, and possibly even a better deal than we had with C2K. What am I missing?

One TFP is not an hour. It's less than that... I can't remember exactly how much, though. And their trips pay a crapload more rig/min day than ours do when you do the conversion between TFP and credit hours.

As far as PG's comment about how years ago they were tried to be claimed as our peer by management. Well, the simple fact is they weren't. They didn't fly into any major hubs and were a small carrier that cherry picked low demand routes. That has all changed.... they are now the largest domestic carrier in the US and run a hub and spoke system (ahem... large focus cities? yeah, ATL is a large focus city for us...) with a decent amount of point to point as well.

They have placed themselves in our peer group through years of growth. And soon they will be competing with us on local international as well as Hawaii.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 09:11 AM
  #295  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
One TFP is not an hour. It's less than that... I can't remember exactly how much, though.

As far as PG's comment about how years ago they were tried to be claimed as our peer by management. Well, the simple fact is they weren't. They didn't fly into any major hubs and were a small carrier that cherry picked low demand routes. That has all changed.... they are now the largest domestic carrier in the US and run a hub and spoke system (ahem... large focus cities? yeah, ATL is a large focus city for us...) with a decent amount of point to point as well.
Exactly. So... since one TFP is less than an hour, it sounds like they are flying pretty close to a comparable number of hours to what we are flying, with more days off, and getting $100K annually more to do it (for narrowbody domestic Captains). If I am remembering correctly, I don't think they've had any large pay increases since 9/11... they just didn't take pay cuts and got some small increases (about like what we've gotten). Correct? And if that's true, then it also looks to me like they were probably making out better back in the 2000-2004 time frame than we were with C2K. And, of course, they have completely left us in the dust since.

Then, as you point out, they are now the largest U.S. domestic carrier with a good deal of their operations closely resembling our "hub and spoke" (or whatever you want to call it). The more I think about this, the more wrong PG and his DALPA "strategic thinkers" appear to be!
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 11:05 AM
  #296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,469
Default

Averaged 18.1 days off per month last year. High time flyer.

18 days off, after sick, vacation, etc, etc, for an AVERAGE, doesn't seem that impressive if I can average that while busting my butt flying.

The pay, for n/b flying, is nice.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 11:17 AM
  #297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Averaged 18.1 days off per month last year. High time flyer.

18 days off, after sick, vacation, etc, etc, for an AVERAGE, doesn't seem that impressive if I can average that while busting my butt flying.

The pay, for n/b flying, is nice.
Just curious, are you saying you averaged 18.1 days off NOT including time off for vacation, sick, etc.? And are you a SWA pilot?
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 11:36 AM
  #298  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,469
Default

Not SW. Looked at how many days I worked last year, 148, for everything. That's actual days away from home. Flying, training, hearings, appeals, etc, etc.

The vacation, sick, off, was 217 days, so it's 18.1 including vacation, etc. Sick was a handful of days(illness in family/bereavement leave).

Don't know how SW defined 'days off', but 148 gone, 217 home, are my numbers.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 11:45 AM
  #299  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Not SW. Looked at how many days I worked last year, 148, for everything. That's actual days away from home. Flying, training, hearings, appeals, etc, etc.

The vacation, sick, off, was 217 days, so it's 18.1 including vacation, etc. Sick was a handful of days(illness in family/bereavement leave).

Don't know how SW defined 'days off', but 148 gone, 217 home, are my numbers.
How AAre negotiAAtions going with AA management? Obviously whatever contract you get will have an effect on us. Based on your past posts on AA recalls, it looks like your AA, is that correct? Do you live in Dallas and have a neighbor who is SWA? Must have some interesting discussions.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 12:08 PM
  #300  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
I assume you are talking about me. I will stand by my statement that they aren't our peer.
I know you'll stand by your statement. You've shown no aptitude for admitting you're wrong no matter what the facts are.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
But don't put words in my mouth regarding pay comparisons. I have NEVER said "we can't hope to acieve (sp?) their pay"
No, you just give voice to management's/DALPA's excuses as to why we shouldn't even consider it.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
What was your response the past 20 years when management claimed SWA was the peer of NWA pilots, and thus you guys should be paid the same as they??? How is that all of a sudden now you've changed your mind?
Answered very well by the numerous previous posters.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
angry tanker
Cargo
91
03-08-2007 08:56 AM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM
SkyHigh
Major
88
11-19-2006 09:20 AM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM
SWAjet
Major
8
08-19-2005 08:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices