DAL early retirement 2009/2011
#221
I'll be 52 years old in September. While I have no doubt I could have made substantially better wages had I chosen another profession, it's too late for me to start over in another career and I happen to like the one I'm in very much. And I have NEVER said I could have made "10 times" my current wage and worked "half as much." Why are you being such a drama queen about this? Do you not get my point that we need very substantial increases to our pay and improvements to our scope to meet the expectations that most of us have for our careers and our families financial futures? Do you also not realize that a person can be dissatisfied with the current situation (which I think is absolutely ridiculous), focused on correcting it, and at the same time not be "miserable?" I'm really disappointed in you, T. That's Buzz Hazzard kind of stuff. I thought you were better than that.
#222
Yes* and yes*. And I take it back. Sounds like you would not be disappointed in the Chair of Strategic Planning's answer.
* Depending on whether or not you are saying SWA, our soon to be biggest competitor in ATL, is a "peer." 40% above SWA's current pay would put a narrowbody domestic Captain at over $322K/year and a narrowbody domestic F/O at over $196K/year. That would be substantially greater than a C2K+COLA restoration... and even I will admit is probably unrealistic.
* Depending on whether or not you are saying SWA, our soon to be biggest competitor in ATL, is a "peer." 40% above SWA's current pay would put a narrowbody domestic Captain at over $322K/year and a narrowbody domestic F/O at over $196K/year. That would be substantially greater than a C2K+COLA restoration... and even I will admit is probably unrealistic.
Aircraft Categories (affects training costs)
SWA - 1
DAL - 8
Consecutive years of profitability
SWA - 38
DAL - 1
Number of times entity went bankrupt
SWA - 0
DAL - 1
International Operations
SWA - No
DAL - Yes
Network Carrier
SWA - No
DAL - Yes
CASM
SWA - about 6 cents I think
DAL - about 8 cents I think
401k
SWA - 9.3% match
DAL - 13% now, 14% next year -- no match required
The only similarities I see are 1) we both fly a version of the 737, and 2) eventually SWA will begin operations in ATL. But my best guess is that the AirTran employees will have a minimum of a 3 year transition to SWA pay, meaning our primary ATL competition really doesn't have higher pay rates, and likely won't for some time.
#223
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
#224
SWA a peer? You can say it, but that doesn't make it so, imo. Let's do a brief comparison:
Aircraft Categories (affects training costs)
SWA - 1
DAL - 8
Consecutive years of profitability
SWA - 38
DAL - 1
Number of times entity went bankrupt
SWA - 0
DAL - 1
International Operations
SWA - No
DAL - Yes
Network Carrier
SWA - No
DAL - Yes
CASM
SWA - about 6 cents I think
DAL - about 8 cents I think
401k
SWA - 9.3% match
DAL - 13% now, 14% next year -- no match required
The only similarities I see are 1) we both fly a version of the 737, and 2) eventually SWA will begin operations in ATL. But my best guess is that the AirTran employees will have a minimum of a 3 year transition to SWA pay, meaning our primary ATL competition really doesn't have higher pay rates, and likely won't for some time.
Aircraft Categories (affects training costs)
SWA - 1
DAL - 8
Consecutive years of profitability
SWA - 38
DAL - 1
Number of times entity went bankrupt
SWA - 0
DAL - 1
International Operations
SWA - No
DAL - Yes
Network Carrier
SWA - No
DAL - Yes
CASM
SWA - about 6 cents I think
DAL - about 8 cents I think
401k
SWA - 9.3% match
DAL - 13% now, 14% next year -- no match required
The only similarities I see are 1) we both fly a version of the 737, and 2) eventually SWA will begin operations in ATL. But my best guess is that the AirTran employees will have a minimum of a 3 year transition to SWA pay, meaning our primary ATL competition really doesn't have higher pay rates, and likely won't for some time.
#225
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Heck, with that comparison, it looks like mgmt can argue to lower pay.
#226
#228
Sorry for posting FACTS. Feel free to rebut with your own. You can leave the emotional responses at home.
#229
{name that movie}
#230
Let me ask a very simple question. Do you think the DAL pilots can be paid 40% above the next highest carrier's pilots? Not saying we're not "worth" that; not saying that it wouldn't only take a $5 (or whatever the amount is) rise in ticket prices to cover it.
I'm asking specifically: is there a way in the current environment to achieve that?
I'm asking specifically: is there a way in the current environment to achieve that?
I don't usually get into these "discussions" but, my question back to you would be: How long would we actually be paid 40% more than the next highest carrier? With pattern bargaining and American and UCAL in negotiations right now, if we got a 40% premium, I don't think we'd be there long. If they come to an agreement before us we'll just have to see........
Denny
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post