Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
787's serious problems ... Boeing's in a hole >

787's serious problems ... Boeing's in a hole

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

787's serious problems ... Boeing's in a hole

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2011, 04:15 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by aerospacepilot
For those who are looking to bash Boeing about outsourcing any chance they get, I refer you to the quote above. This is very common in new aircraft design. Boeing built an aggressive product, and it has been successful on 95% of its promises. As the design gets more mature, this will improve.

Boeing would love to have these components built in house, with competitive labor rates, but Boeing's unions drove the labor rates out of the water to the point that it was no longer competitive to do much of the work in house, therefore Boeing began outsourcing. People who turn wrenches making huge salaries with triple time on Sunday would not allow Boeing to stay price competitive.

Anyone who has been to Detroit recently knows what unions with too much power can do...
Yup, it was the Detroit unions that came up with the Pacer/Pinto/Hornet/Gremlin etc., and built products that got 12 mpg when gas prices doubled. Those were highly reliable products, too, as they had one third the warranty of those (union made) imports.

Oh, I guess it was non-competitive labor rates that drove Boeing to buy the South Carolina plant...or to take work away from Alenia. Maybe quality does matter. Not that the management team should take any heat for building an airplane 22,000 lbs overweight...

Which 95% has it been successful on? The 3 years late and still rolling backwards? Weight? Range? How about dispatch reliability? 95% across the board isn't even competitive with current generation stuff. Maybe in 3 years they'll get the 7/8/7 delivery as they promised.

Get a clue. Step away from the Faux News channel and the talking points from the anti-union crowd. Then, after you realize that almost all of those import companies use union labor at home, you can talk about price competitiveness.
slowplay is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 06:35 PM
  #82  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by aerospacepilot
For those who are looking to bash Boeing about outsourcing any chance they get, I refer you to the quote above.
You refer us to a quote from an anonymous web poster? You're quite the fact finder, aren't you.

Originally Posted by aerospacepilot
This is very common in new aircraft design. Boeing built an aggressive product, and it has been successful on 95% of its promises. As the design gets more mature, this will improve.
You don't know what you're talking about. This is extraordinarily uncommon. I don't know of a single time in aviation history where a new aircraft's delivery schedule failed as bad as the 787 has.

Originally Posted by aerospacepilot
Boeing would love to have these components built in house, with competitive labor rates, but Boeing's unions drove the labor rates out of the water to the point that it was no longer competitive to do much of the work in house, therefore Boeing began outsourcing.
Pure BS. Boeing tried to prove a point to its union employees, and to prove correct all those professors at business schools who are in love with their theory of outsourcing. Boeing failed.

Originally Posted by aerospacepilot
People who turn wrenches making huge salaries with triple time on Sunday would not allow Boeing to stay price competitive.
More absolute BS. A Boeing employee who makes triple time working on Sundays is very rare.

Originally Posted by aerospacepilot
Anyone who has been to Detroit recently knows what unions with too much power can do...
Tell us what a CEO with too much power can do? A CEO in love with the theory of outsourcing. This decision to outsource the 787 has destroyed any savings due to outsourcing many times over.

You need to get over your knee-jerk union hating mentality. It will just make you continue to excuse extremely poor managerial decisions. Poor management needs to be terminated for the sake of the shareholders...not excused.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 07:10 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: non acceptus excretus
Posts: 561
Default

Carl, that last response was wonderful...Five rounds for effect please!
Molon Labe is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 07:35 PM
  #84  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Riddler
Has there ever been an airplane that met/exceeded all its original promises?
The first one.

"will it fly?"

"yes."
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 08:09 PM
  #85  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Riddler
Has there ever been an airplane that met/exceeded all its original promises?

The 777 did, didn't it? I know the 777-200LR far exceeded expectations for a fact.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 08:20 PM
  #86  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

The 787 has met a lot of promises. It will be made by Boeing for one. Have a shark fin for a tail. And it will cause a revolution.

Well, 1 out of 3 ain't bad.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 08:23 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Oh my Lord. Slow and Carl agreeing and working on the same team.

Pay attention folks, you don't see this very often. Is there some sort of weird full moon out or something?
shiznit is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 08:56 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by Riddler
Has there ever been an airplane that met/exceeded all its original promises?
Without knowing exactly what the "original promises" were, it's hard to say. Some category winners, IMHO: DC-3, B-52, KC-135, U-2, C-130, T-38, B-727, and F-15.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 09:33 PM
  #89  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

don't forget the SR-71!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-20-2011, 11:16 PM
  #90  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
don't forget the SR-71!
Well, if Boeing were getting $1Billion per copy for a 787 I'm sure they would have come in on time and spec.
full of luv is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jasonn9999
Major
1
07-25-2008 08:23 PM
wannabepilot
Major
32
09-22-2007 01:53 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
3
12-30-2006 06:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices