Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
The AirTran Pilots' Windfall and SLI >

The AirTran Pilots' Windfall and SLI

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

The AirTran Pilots' Windfall and SLI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2011, 12:35 PM
  #391  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by shredder
Pilots were unhappy with their contract. They voted to strike. Strikes can destroy companies and careers. A strike vote is a serious expression of dissatisfaction with your "career expectations".

Seems pretty simple to me. Not sure how much you want to read into it. Just a simple statement that seems very relevant to this discussion.

Seems pretty simple to you, but the arbiter won't give a flying red-bellied warbird about it.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 12:36 PM
  #392  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaxPowers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by shredder
Pilots were unhappy with their contract. They voted to strike. Strikes can destroy companies and careers. A strike vote is a serious expression of dissatisfaction with your "career expectations".

Seems pretty simple to me. Not sure how much you want to read into it. Just a simple statement that seems very relevant to this discussion.
It's not a "vote to strike", it is an authorization to the Union to call a strike in the event negotiations break down.

To try to use that authorization in some attempt to bolster your position on SLI is pretty cheezy, in my opinion.

Last edited by MaxPowers; 01-18-2011 at 12:48 PM.
MaxPowers is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 12:37 PM
  #393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,369
Default

Originally Posted by shredder
Pilots were unhappy with their contract. They voted to strike. Strikes can destroy companies and careers. A strike vote is a serious expression of dissatisfaction with your "career expectations".

Seems pretty simple to me. Not sure how much you want to read into it. Just a simple statement that seems very relevant to this discussion.
Well, for some reason, the Northwest strike factored little to nothing in the DAL-NWA merger. There, you have precedent... the arbitrator will not look at "strike vote" or "history" when drumming up a seniority list.

As an outsider, I have to "LoL" at SWA pilots' attempts to make the 737 into two different aircraft, a 73-LP at AAI, and a 73-BP at SWA... then to say that since they're company has the BP version, the seniority integration should be affected by it.

The only hope (for the industry) is that, no matter what the outcome of the ARBITRATED list (it's clear where it's going), is that both pilot groups agree to be bound by it, and don't start a petty game later on, if it's not "the result they wanted/expected".
cencal83406 is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 12:49 PM
  #394  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by shredder
Pilots were unhappy with their contract. They voted to strike. Strikes can destroy companies and careers. A strike vote is a serious expression of dissatisfaction with your "career expectations".

Seems pretty simple to me. Not sure how much you want to read into it. Just a simple statement that seems very relevant to this discussion.
Because they were dissatisfied with their contract is no more relevant than the color of their airplanes are to the discussion.
tsquare is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 12:52 PM
  #395  
On Reserve
 
Zeroto4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: C-172 Captain
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by mulcher
Well I have been at 1 other and a Fractional. CA at all three. I guess I should have demanded to be at my first CA date of hire then. Oh well! Its working out just fine for me. Like I said. These discussions here are useless. We will all have to wait and see. Until then its only speculation. Fire away SWA haters. There sure are some ugly self deserving people on here though.

I for one will welcome arbitration. Especially after talking with my Rep, the MC and a few others. SWAPA has a very good case and everyone will be handled on its own merits. Good luck. Heres to seeing the trannies on the road. Sorry if some get their panties in a wad over trannies.
What is SWAPA's case?
Zeroto4 is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 12:54 PM
  #396  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

One more time, relative seniority harms every pilot at every position of the SWA seniority list.

Any arbitrator will see that.

They will also recognize that at relative seniority, SWA pilots are THE ONLY LOSERS. Airtran pilots risk and lose nothing.

As a junior SWA FO, I'm not interested in becoming an instant captain as a result of this SLI, but I will exercise all means available to make sure that additional roadblocks are not placed in my career progression.

Anything close to relative seniority puts so many younger guys ahead of me that my career expectations will suffer. The demographics of these two airlines are vastly different.

At the same time, what is the cost and risk being borne by the Airtran pilots?
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 12:55 PM
  #397  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by Zeroto4
What is SWAPA's case?
Tell me ALPA's case first.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 12:58 PM
  #398  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
One more time, relative seniority harms every pilot at every position of the SWA seniority list.

Any arbitrator will see that.

They will also recognize that at relative seniority, SWA pilots are THE ONLY LOSERS. Airtran pilots risk and lose nothing.

As a junior SWA FO, I'm not interested in becoming an instant captain as a result of this SLI, but I will exercise all means available to make sure that additional roadblocks are not placed in my career progression.

Anything close to relative seniority puts so many younger guys ahead of me that my career expectations will suffer. The demographics of these two airlines are vastly different.

At the same time, what is the cost and risk being borne by the Airtran pilots?

You mean your 20 year upgrade vs. a 22 year upgrade for AirTran?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 01:01 PM
  #399  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
You mean your 20 year upgrade vs. a 22 year upgrade for AirTran?
Nice attempt at humor. I'll take as seriously as the thought you put into it.

In the meantime my post was serious.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 01:20 PM
  #400  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
One more time, relative seniority harms every pilot at every position of the SWA seniority list.

Any arbitrator will see that.

They will also recognize that at relative seniority, SWA pilots are THE ONLY LOSERS. Airtran pilots risk and lose nothing.

As a junior SWA FO, I'm not interested in becoming an instant captain as a result of this SLI, but I will exercise all means available to make sure that additional roadblocks are not placed in my career progression.

Anything close to relative seniority puts so many younger guys ahead of me that my career expectations will suffer. The demographics of these two airlines are vastly different.

At the same time, what is the cost and risk being borne by the Airtran pilots?
Welcome to merger 101.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyguppy
United
227
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
Ravensvic
Frontier
71
10-18-2012 06:56 PM
tailwheel48
United
63
11-22-2010 02:08 PM
LuvJockey
Major
78
08-20-2009 08:03 PM
Superpilot92
Mergers and Acquisitions
122
07-21-2008 07:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices