Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
SWAPA has a TA about the 737-800 >

SWAPA has a TA about the 737-800

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

SWAPA has a TA about the 737-800

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2010, 03:35 PM
  #31  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Pielut
Hold an ATP, 2 type ratings. Thanks.
I don't think type ratings on a copy machine and water cooler count dude.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:13 PM
  #32  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Their pilots already make $206/hr plus 10% minimum profit sharing every year to fly a 737. It's kind of hard for them to demand a raise.
WHAT!? I don't even know how to respond to this!
ewrpow is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:45 PM
  #33  
Careful w/that axe Eugene
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: HOTAS...and a SWA gear lever
Posts: 369
Default

Originally Posted by Pielut
Pilots do not generate any revenue, they are an expense
And airplanes don't generate revenue, cuz they cost money and are an expense,
and the baggage belt-loader doesn't generate revenue cuz they cost money,
and well, I guess the only thing that generates revenue according to your logic is ...what? The air because it's free? No wait, it just helps generate lift.

Did you take economics the same place you got your ATP and type-ratings?

You wanna work for less, great. There's a little airport a couple miles from me pays tow-pilots $3 per tow.

Meanwhile....

Pie-lut...time to shut the pie-hole.
Nortonious is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:51 PM
  #34  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Nortonious
And airplanes don't generate revenue, cuz they cost money and are an expense,
and the baggage belt-loader doesn't generate revenue cuz they cost money,
and well, I guess the only thing that generates revenue according to your logic is ...what? The air because it's free? No wait, it just helps generate lift.

Did you take economics the same place you got your ATP and type-ratings?

You wanna work for less, great. There's a little airport a couple miles from me pays tow-pilots $3 per tow.

Meanwhile....

Pie-lut...time to shut the pie-hole.
This guy is just a cubicle troll trying to make you believe he's/she's a pilot. As a management type or wannabe, he/she believes what they're told...and that is management generates the revenue because they carry the passengers on their backs with only the sweat off their brows as fuel.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:54 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Phoenix
Posts: 732
Default

carl, i finally agree with you!
pilotrob23 is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:08 PM
  #36  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

dear lord, it was one thing to see Carl and Tsquare come together, but to see something that brings SWA and DAL pilots together!?

Seriously, I hope SWA gets a pay raise for the 800s. Now we can bicker about companys but I believe one thing for sure- a pay raise for one pilot group is a good thing for every other pilot group.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:23 PM
  #37  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Pielut
Who's kidding who,

Take the emotion out of this. The general air traveling public does not give a ******* about who is flying the airplane, they just want the cheapest ticket. Pilots do not generate any revenue, they are an expense, the job is to safely move the aircraft from location to location without killing anyone. Look at the rest of the economy, I am sorry but if you are making 200k you are not exactlly suffering. I never advocated pay going down or anyone's taxes going up.
The job is to safely move the aircraft from location to location... because without the pilots the plane would move from location to location but it wouldn't be safe.

I guess in a way that's true.

Here's one thing to remember when you move away from posting on airliners.net and come to airlinepilotforums, we're not 16 and telling everyone we're not only the CEO but a gold plus with platinum sprinkles medallion FFer and a veteran airline pilot and thus we know all.

BTW, Delta has 75,000 employees, almost 12,000 pilots, lots of planes and lots of stuff. But how many people do you have to have to earn a commercial air carrier certificate, the same type of certificate that Delta has? Uno. One. A pilot. The rest is just overkill.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:59 PM
  #38  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
dear lord, it was one thing to see Carl and Tsquare come together, but to see something that brings SWA and DAL pilots together!?
I know...weird isn't it. I'm about to go to my mailbox to see if there's a Thank You card from Moak! Could happen.

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Seriously, I hope SWA gets a pay raise for the 800s. Now we can bicker about companys but I believe one thing for sure- a pay raise for one pilot group is a good thing for every other pilot group.
Very true. I hope the details of this agreement shows SWA got a huge bump in pay for the 737 fleet.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 04:53 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

The side letter would give a small raise on ALL of our flying (I think about 1% over what we previously had). It also extends our contract and adds a profitability based raise in the new last year. As the company has been doing very well lately, these profitability based raises could be 3% or more.

Considering that we're not even going to see an -800 on the property for a while and by the end of the contract we'll still have very few, I don't think it's that bad. I may never fly an 800 in the next two years but I still get the raise.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 05:32 PM
  #40  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
The side letter would give a small raise on ALL of our flying (I think about 1% over what we previously had). It also extends our contract and adds a profitability based raise in the new last year. As the company has been doing very well lately, these profitability based raises could be 3% or more.

Considering that we're not even going to see an -800 on the property for a while and by the end of the contract we'll still have very few, I don't think it's that bad. I may never fly an 800 in the next two years but I still get the raise.
I cant say I've ever been excited about a profitability raise. It's not something you can include in the budget when planning for the year and is up to the yahoos (however good or bad) that can either manage or mismanage you in and out of profitability.

I was hoping for a bit more, but thats more for personal future contract negotations reasons.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rjlavender
Major
38
09-12-2013 07:30 PM
vagabond
Technical
4
10-31-2010 01:43 AM
1Seat 1Engine
Major
11
06-15-2007 05:20 AM
Freight Dog
Major
61
02-26-2007 07:06 AM
Widow's Son
Major
3
04-03-2006 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices