Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2014, 05:40 PM
  #9291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Karnak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
You are right Kevin Bacon. Everything is fine!!!!!!
When's the vote?
Karnak is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:40 PM
  #9292  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak
The short answer is because some focus more on our differences than our common goals. Causes of that are difference priorities.

If we were all 45 year old captains still married to our original wives, with 2.5 kids, who lived in base, and had $2-million in our 401(k) account, then only 5 things would divide us (politics, religion, beer preference, CDO's, and whether or not the DH is bad for baseball).

DPA preys on the differences. ALPA focuses on the common goals.

We can find exceptions to those two statements, and that keeps this thread going. Too bad. If Timmy dropped the predatory exploitation of our differences, and accepted the fact that all organizations have flaws that need fixing, I think we could make some progress correcting ALPA's lapses in focus.

"In order to form a more perfect union…" I read that somewhere.
Originally Posted by tsquare
Very very good post sir.
I like this one better:

Originally Posted by tsquare
They are gonna say whatever crapola they need to say to sway the voters.. which ain't US... We have no say in who gets elected. National is out of touch.. and out of control. It is truly depressing to watch the "leadership" get all the perks and a retirement that makes even some CEOs envious yet here we are with 1990 payrates...

Still waiting for Mr. Prater to get off his butt and show up at an LEC meeting..... ANY LEC meeting at the world's largest airline with his agenda as to how he is going to "take back this profession"
My tsquare speaks for me!!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:42 PM
  #9293  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Karnak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Differing priorities has nothing to do with the division in our group. It is ALPA's behavior. Nobody in our group prioritized the gutting of our scope. That was ALPA's priority to get the regionals on board as ALPA members. Nobody in our group prioritized stabbing TWA pilots in the back. That was ALPA's priority in an attempt to gain American pilots as members. Nobody in our group prioritized the busting of the union of ALPA's own clerical workers. Nobody in our group prioritized giving away profit sharing, and our reps specifically ordered that not be done without their prior approval. ALPA had other priorities and we got the cut in profit sharing anyway. I could go on with many more examples.

Again, this has nothing to do with differing priorities among Delta pilots. We Delta pilots understand that differing priorities are part of a group of 12,000 pilots. Our division is based on the actual performance of our bargaining agent. Some are OK with it, some are not. That's the issue.

Carl
How many of the contracts ratified by sizable majorities did you vote for?
Karnak is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:46 PM
  #9294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Karnak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Why did ALPA need to put together such a costly sales job for C12? How much did that cost?

Why wasn't the pilot group presented with a "pros/cons" summary?

What was ALPA afraid of?

Does anyone doubt another sales job will be needed for C15?
Did you read any of the perspectives put out by our reps? If you did, please acknowledge that there was a lot of very thoughtful "Con" data and opinions published by our dues to present several perspectives.
Karnak is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:52 PM
  #9295  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak
No! They are not. They are making inherent differences a rallying cry for replacement of ALPA.
Union busting and damaging your own members in order to gain new members are not "inherent differences" Karnak.

Originally Posted by Karnak
The fact that DPA specifically states they don't want to "fix" ALPA, they want to replace ALPA, should lead every pilot to ask the logical follow-up, "When DPA's flaws are identified, should we just replace DPA instead of trying to fix it?"
That would indeed be a logical question if pilots hadn't been trying to "fix" ALPA for decades, and ALPA responding with steadfast refusal and attack against anyone trying to "fix" them. If DPA refused to be fixed for as long as ALPA has refused, then yes...DPA should be replaced.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 06:09 PM
  #9296  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak
The divisions within ALPA are as much as you choose to make them.
Interesting. If you see problems within ALPA, best keep your mouth shut or Karnak here will tell you you're making too much of it and causing division. This is why you MEC insiders are such poor debaters. You get no practice within the echo chamber. As you've been told many times before by reps who you castigate: Unanimity does not equal unity.

Originally Posted by Karnak
We all want a great contract. All. Everyone of us.
That's simply not true Karnak. You do not. Since I've been here you've done nothing but lower expectations and offer the advice of appeasement. This is just the latest example:

Originally Posted by Karnak
The term "restoration" should be banned from any contract discussions. We should position ourselves so we aren't vulnerable to the abrupt losses that result in the need for restoration in the future. It's been done by others. That was the history I was providing.
At least you've been consistent Karnak.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 12:12 AM
  #9297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 956
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Wow. Analysis...so easy, even a caveman can do it.



It depends which survey you're talking about tsquare. I suspect ALPA knows their survey participation was far less than the participation in DPA's survey.

Carl
This comes to mind.
Hillbilly is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 08:14 AM
  #9298  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by zoomiezombie
It's the DPA's opinion and assumption that the FBI was investigating???
Yes. Unless you're in the FBI, you're guessing. Almost every one of your posted quotes from DPA that discusses FBI involvement is a hope or desire. The one that you posted that sounds like a definitive statement that an FBI investigation is ongoing was wrong of them to write. They simply don't know for certain.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 08:24 AM
  #9299  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
The DTW CA Rep said otherwise and that the MEC authorized (like a vote but not an actual vote) the committee in a closed session during a Seattle meeting and they were updated at every meeting until the committee went away.
"Like a vote, but not an actual vote." I've heard nothing like that from my reps. There was a long stretch of Special Committee operations where the reps did not know of their existence. Also, exactly when did the Special Committee supposedly stop operating?

Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
I count at least three of the last five true headings with authors about par with how many DPA updates have names.
They've posted a bunch of True Headings over the last few years. Initially, they were never authored by name. Lately I've only skimmed them so maybe I missed authors by name. I'll go back and look.

Carl

Edit: just went back to my emails and looked at the last five True Headings from the Special Committee. They are documents 14-12 through 14-16. Not one of those documents show an author. None.

Last edited by Carl Spackler; 10-09-2014 at 08:39 AM.
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 08:36 AM
  #9300  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That's simply not true Karnak. You do not.
Carl,

This is another example of you stating your opinion as fact. While that opinion is apparently based on what you read into Karnak's posts, you cannot possibly have any personal knowledge of his wants and desires.

Opinions or beliefs, yes. Knowledge that warrants a statement fact, no.
Alan Shore is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices