Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2014, 06:15 PM
  #9051  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Your math is way off, 80.

The profit sharing pool was $506m this year. The only piece we gave up was 5% of the first $2.5B, which equals $125m. So the total profit sharing pool, absent the change, would have been $631m (506+125). If $506m resulted in an 8.2% payout, then $631 would be 10.2%. So, you received 2% less of your 2013 wages; I doubt that equals $6000.
The math is fine, the issue is the input data that I'm working with. How much were we over 2.5 billion? sailingfun seemed to indicate that for our profit sharing purposes we were well above 3 billion which changes the ratio significantly. The biggest divergence would have of course been if we were right at 2.5 billion.

And besides (given that your data is correct, which I'm assuming it is due to your connections), the 10.2% to 8.2% change is a 19.7% reduction.

Last edited by 80ktsClamp; 02-05-2014 at 06:27 PM.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 06:28 PM
  #9052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The math is fine, the issue is the input data that I'm working with. How much were we over 2.5 billion? sailingfun seemed to indicate that for our profit sharing purposes we were well above 3 billion which changes the ratio significantly. The biggest divergence would have of course been if we were right at 2.5 billion.

And besides (given that your data is correct, which I'm assuming it is due to your connections), the 10.2% to 8.2% change is a 19.7% reduction.
I agree. And I'm not very happy we agreed to the 19.7% reduction, but it's not $6,000 as you suggested and its not 33% as so many claim.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 06:38 PM
  #9053  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
I agree. And I'm not very happy we agreed to the 19.7% reduction, but it's not $6,000 as you suggested and its not 33% as so many claim.
The concession is variable of course depending on how much the company is making. It starts at 33.3% and in this case went down to 19.7% due to the amount above 2.5B. How much were we above 2.5 billion for profit sharing purposes?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 06:45 PM
  #9054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The concession is variable of course depending on how much the company is making. It starts at 33.3% and in this case went down to 19.7% due to the amount above 2.5B. How much were we above 2.5 billion for profit sharing purposes?
Well, if

a) the profit sharing bucket is $506 million, and
b) the formula is 10% x $2.5 billion + 20% x (X - $2.5 billion)

Solving for "X" yields $1.28 billion

Meaning our total PTIX = $2.5 billion + $1.28 billion = $3.78 billion
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 06:50 PM
  #9055  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Management and DALPA are making huge mistakes...They would be much better served restoring the concessions extorted in Chapter 11.
Are you suggesting that DALPA somehow has the power to restore these concessions or is somehow complicit in them not having been restored?
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 06:52 PM
  #9056  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
I know it was a heck of a lot more than 4-8-3-3. Are you saying it wasn't?
And I'm sure you know that we got a heck of a lot more than what 4-8-3-3 sounds.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 06:59 PM
  #9057  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Vikz09
If next year the company makes 3 billion which sounds like it is a real possibility this "little 5%" reduction In profit sharing will cost the pilot group 125 million in lost profit sharing.
I respectfully disagree. We gave up our share of the employees' profit sharing plan and agreed to go from 15% to 10% of the first $2.5B of profit. As we are about 1/3 of the total eligible employee pool's W-2, we get about 1/3 of the total profit sharing.

So, the 5% of $2.5B that the employee group as a whole lost is $125M. Our 1/3 of that is $41.7M. In a year in which Delta makes at least $2.5B profit, our reduction is worth $41.7M. In a year in which Delta makes less than $2.5B (or even loses money), our reduction is worth less (or even zero).
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 07:00 PM
  #9058  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Well, if

a) the profit sharing bucket is $506 million, and
b) the formula is 10% x $2.5 billion + 20% x (X - $2.5 billion)

Solving for "X" yields $1.28 billion

Meaning our total PTIX = $2.5 billion + $1.28 billion = $3.78 billion
Yeah, I came up with the same. It seemed too high, even above what sailingfun said it was. I figured the squirming baby in my lap was to blame for a math failure.

The reason everyone was thinking it was so much more of a concession was due to the company publicly reporting a 2.7 billion dollar profit, which would have yielded around a 30% concession.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 07:00 PM
  #9059  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Okay (and this question is for Johnso too)...

If a flight crew member determines for himself that exactly 8 hours behind the door is sufficient, is he legal?

Or let me ask a similar question... If I decide that 300 knots below 10,000' over the U.S. Is sufficient, have I violated any FAR?
The answer to your question is that it's your decision. Crewmembers must be provided 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep opportunity. You can't put a specific definition on that. Some guys can fall asleep in a hard chair in 30 seconds. Others need perfect conditions. Temp at 65 degrees, dark conditions, etc. It's your decision to decide whether you're rested. It always has been. Did you ever hesitate to call in fatigued before the law backed you up?
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 07:04 PM
  #9060  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
How much QOL loss resulted from ALV+15 (sold by DALPA as only used in international categories)? How about the harrassment caused by the "good faith" sick leave verification? DALPA told us it wouldn't happen. Then they told us it wasn't happening. Finally, they had to admit it was happening..and couldn't do anything about it; the loophole was massive. How about 7 short calls? There's a massive giveback...after we just negotiated for 6 in the merger.

The minor (especially when compared to the company's massive success) improvements are more than offest by QOL and productivity concessions. Bundle that with our profit sharing punt, and C12 is stacking up as a miserable, shortsighted failure. At least we rushed to get it done. You know, "fleeting opportunities" and all..

But thanks for the DALPA sales job rehash. Good times.


IDK PD. Why don't you provide us with statistical data that backs your claim? Just how much are reserves being flown to ALV+15. And how many good faith "harassment" sick calls occur each month? Are they even occurring right now? And how many times has anyone sat 7 SCs yet? And will it happen every month? Nope.

When you can come back with actual proof to your claims, then maybe I'll listen.
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices