Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2013, 04:26 AM
  #8631  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by index
DAL is in its best financial position ever. This industry is and has always been cyclical.
DAL was in better financial shape 1996-2000 (98 being the best year), which set the stage for C2K. It had better operating and pretax margins and a much lower debt.

Let's please discuss from facts.
slowplay is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 04:47 AM
  #8632  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot

As for the first part, how one votes in a recall is about the job being performed, the confidence that your concerns that you have individually brought up multiple times will go away, and the concerns of multiple Reps on both sides of the vote of this being in front of us again in a few months will never happen, not about philosophies. Its about confidence and not letting some fear cover your concerns that you had well before a recall process even started. Its not politics, but its convenient to label it that.
The recall should never have happened. KR should have resigned. In my memory he's the first MEC Chair at DAL to force a recall vote...GH, BS, and CG all resigned when it was clear they'd lost the support of the majority of the guys they worked for. KR took it to a vote. Why? Post recall his answer was pure politics... he wanted blame and division, not what was best for Delta pilots. "Bloody fingerprints" and all. No wonder Carl misses him.

I've gone back and looked at the various council comm again. I see a majority of reps articulating performance reasons for recall. I see the minority practicing the politics of personal destruction. No facts. No performance evaluation. Just high school student council finger pointing. Sure wish they'd raise their game.

There's an election coming up in a couple of weeks. It'd be nice if the MEC would collectively look forward for all our best interests.
slowplay is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 05:34 AM
  #8633  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
The recall should never have happened. KR should have resigned. In my memory he's the first MEC Chair at DAL to force a recall vote...GH, BS, and CG all resigned when it was clear they'd lost the support of the majority of the guys they worked for. KR took it to a vote. Why? Post recall his answer was pure politics... he wanted blame and division, not what was best for Delta pilots. "Bloody fingerprints" and all. No wonder Carl misses him.
Good insight
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 05:40 AM
  #8634  
Wind the clock beoch
 
index's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
DAL was in better financial shape 1996-2000 (98 being the best year), which set the stage for C2K. It had better operating and pretax margins and a much lower debt.

Let's please discuss from facts.
Fair enough. Here's some facts.

The latest E&FA Report shows DAL's 3Q13 pretax margin at 11.5%, up 3.7% from 3Q12's 7.8%. As for the 1996-2000 time period you described, the annual pretax margins were 8.9%, 10.8%, 12.0%, 11.3%, and 8%. (And yes, I know I'm comparing quarterly to annual percentages, I just don't have time to pull up the YTD numbers. If you have 'em, by all means post it.) Better shape in 1996-2000? Sure, but not by much.

Further, there are a number of things we as pilots do not control: the price of fuel, interest rates, how much the company borrows, what the company spends its money on (like $1B in stock buy backs and dividends), etc... All of these affect pretax margin and none of them are within our control.

Fuel is one of the biggest cost items for an airline. During the period 1996-2000 the avg price of a barrel of oil per year was $22.12, $20.61, $14.42, $19.34, and $30.38 respectively. What is it now? Do you think that has got a lot to do with our pretax margin? ABSOLUTELY. Sure I'd like fuel prices to stay low, but if they don't I'm not going to fret----or willingly hand over my wallet. And I'm not going to let high fuel prices dictate my worth.

What has CEO and other executive pay done since the "more profitable" timeframe of 1996-2000 to now? It's gone through the roof, pretax margins be damned.

Do you really not think you're worth the $ you were paid a DECADE ago? I know you do, but you're going to have to start making pilot arguments for why this is the case. The problem is we have too many pilots that believe they are managers. Management is perfectly capable of making its arguments. Although it's certainly easier for them when the pilots voluntarily help out.
index is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 05:49 AM
  #8635  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by index
Absolutely false. In fact, the exact opposite is true. ACL refused to sign the letter drafted by the mutineers. The letter he DID sign was in direct opposition to the Hazard cabal.
The letter called for a hearing, not an outcome. As things tuned out, the hearing cleared and confirmed those Officers.

ACL wanted the facts out on the table for consideration.
Originally Posted by index
After a lengthy meeting with his fellow ATL reps the day before the recall meeting, they reached "consensus," in other words, he did an about face and caved to political pressure. Not the kind of guy I want representing me.
I know additional facts came to light that day that none of the four anticipated. Four smart men saw these facts and reached the same conclusions.

Just as I wrote here on this board, when I spoke to my Reps they had completely different ways of reaching the same conclusions. I figured when they got together they would find common ground, more reinforcing each other's concerns than disputing them.

Many seem to have misunderstood the second letter, seeing it purely as reactionary politics (and perhaps for some it was), but, there were some who just wanted to gain the full view of the facts. ACL's nature, as you have seen on this board is to dig ... he's not happy just to know bleed air powers the packs ... the's the guy who wants to know which stage the bleed comes from and when the hi stage valve opens and closes ... he was a LCA at his previous carrier after all.

In this instance there was an unusual problem, as Slowplay explained. The first action might have been obvious, but for some the second letter was digging into the mechanics of the thing.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 05:50 AM
  #8636  
Wind the clock beoch
 
index's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Consensus of what, how to vote, or outcomes that would provide the least harm? Big difference.
I put consensus in quotes to expression my cynicism about the term. "Consensus" is ALPA speak for get your butt in line. It goes hand in hand with "unity"- another favorite that has been used time and time again by the ruling elite.
index is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 05:57 AM
  #8637  
Wind the clock beoch
 
index's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
DAL88 Knows the debate we had a few years ago when I said that. It's not two from now, and we were not discussing buying power.
Well I don't know the debate. Why don't you share your logic on how you came up with "at least two negotiating cycles" to reach restoration? So is it 2? At least 2, does that mean 3? Or could it be 4, that's at least 2, right? You said not two from now, is it going to happen this time around?
index is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 06:04 AM
  #8638  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Good insight
"You are the best"
"No, you are"
"No, no. you are, really, top notch"
"Thanks, but I really think you are"
"We are great, aren't we? Really smart"
"Yes, we are. Everyone else sees it too"
boog123 is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 06:07 AM
  #8639  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Index,

Wish that Sonny McDowall and Hollis Harris were still around to talk to. Prior to the ratification of Contract 2000, there was relatively open discussion that the agreement would never be honored. For a variety of reasons, chiefly under advice from McKinsey Consultants, Delta was going to reorganize in bankruptcy. Delta had no more intention of honoring Contract 2000 than United management had of honoring theirs. We really followed in United's footsteps, but did better both as a business and as a pilot group.

I always come back to the scope section because it is so easy to show, in fleet numbers, the unsustainability of the basic concept. In over simplified terms there were was a 3 to 1 mainline to RJ ratio. But, Delta had already ordered 500 mostly growth RJ's. Did anyone seriously think there was a 1,500 mainline jet order coming to keep up? That would have put Delta mainline at something around 2,100 jets (if memory serves, this was a long time ago).

This isn't to discredit the high water mark, but hopefully help folks understand that what pilots accepted as reality was something management had very little, if any, intention of honoring. For Leo Mullin, it was an interim placeholder which would be renegotiated in bankruptcy. ALPA took the heat from a lot of angles for the fact management entered into a deal with less than the best of intentions.

Notwithstanding this history, I expect we will see C2000 and the C2004 rates in C2015.

We need the rest of the industry to catch up if we are to ever restore our real earning power and QOL. That job requires a national union.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 11-27-2013 at 06:22 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-27-2013, 06:29 AM
  #8640  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
Has DPA scheduled a vote yet?

Day #4 & One more day divided......
STILL not enough cards.
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices