Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2013, 02:04 PM
  #8461  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Delta MEC Update 13-03

One of the major objectives of this Section 6 negotiation, as determined by the survey, was to increase the amount of flying done by the mainline. While scope is arguably the most complicated section of the PWA, the goal was quite simple: Seek to improve the ratio of flying done by the mainline, increase mainline block hours, and increase mainline aircraft.”

So our goals were to:

 Improve the ratio of flying done by mainline versus DCI

 Increase mainline block hours

 Increase mainline aircraft

There are a number of ways to measure these objectives. In this case, we use:

 Block hour ratio
 Available seat mile (ASM) ratio
 Domestic fleet count
 Scheduled seat ratio
 Scheduled seat count
Perfect. Now both sides can decide which methodology they prefer.

Originally Posted by johnso29
No different than what DPA states by ending their goal with "to the maximum extent possible." With almost 12,000 pilots they're leaving the definition wide open. No solid path. Just promises with no guarantees outside of "we'll try."
Both documents set forth goals and objectives. Both define them accurately and properly. You drive off the road with your falsehood of "we'll try" however. Outside of this, it was a pretty good post...for you.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-23-2013, 02:26 PM
  #8462  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,308
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
I have always paid dues to the union and will always be a member in good standing.

The reason I no longer pay dues to ALPA is because I and my fellow pilots finally admitted a hard reality... Our ALPA reps were ignoring, limiting, and preventing pilot votes. ALPA National never had any concern for us (why would they? They had too many dues groups to keep happy..). And our ALPA local leaders had too many temptations to chase after $400K ALPA National jobs, rather than listen to the line pilot if we doubted something that ALPA National told us was in our best interests. We had an opinion and ALPA didn't allow us to have it.

We went to the NMB and secured for ourselves the right to vote about that! Some of us wanted to keep the ALPA status quo, but a majority did not.
Is the union USAPA by any chance?
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 11-23-2013, 02:31 PM
  #8463  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
Is the union USAPA by any chance?
Yes it is... He's go a whole slew of posts touting usapa. Cue a very long sigh and head shaking.

Yikes.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 11-23-2013, 02:44 PM
  #8464  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by zoomiezombie
The DPA's milk toast constitution statement on outsourcing:
So on one hand, DPA is frothing at the mouth, itching to burn the place down. On the other hand, its rational road map to recapture the rampant outsourcing given away by ALPA is too weak.

Sweet.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 11-23-2013, 02:47 PM
  #8465  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29

No different than what DPA states by ending their goal with "to the maximum extent possible."
You bash DPA's plan as too vague...and they say ALPA's stance is "no different than what DPA states."

Does that make any sense to you?

Hang in there, johnso. You'll get there someday.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 11-23-2013, 04:16 PM
  #8466  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,308
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Yes it is... He's go a whole slew of posts touting usapa. Cue a very long sigh and head shaking.

Yikes.
Yikes is right. Seems pretty proud of the regional pilot wages his group has achieved.
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 11-23-2013, 05:17 PM
  #8467  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
Is the union USAPA by any chance?
It's the union a majority of our pilots voted for. It's not any more complicated than that. Pilot majority.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 11-23-2013, 06:53 PM
  #8468  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
It's the union a majority of our pilots voted for. It's not any more complicated than that. Pilot majority.
And your airline has captains making far less than FOs in the airline thread you're posting in. Piles of court cases lost...absolutely nothing accomplished other than kicking the can down the road and preserving the depth of bankruptcy status quo. Hardly anything to be touting.

I'd run along back to telling others in your threads how binding isn't binding.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 06:31 AM
  #8469  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Starcheck102's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: ATL 7ER A
Posts: 308
Default

It's worse than that. A DAL A320 captain makes more per hour than the combined CREW in an LCC A320. In six years, USAPA has done nothing for its own pilots, and even managed to make the lives of other labor groups worse for the purposes of pattern bargaining.

When they negotiated a new contract coming out of BK, the APA agreed to hourly rates based on metrics for "industry average." Unfortunately that average included LCC rates.

So nice job getting that merger, it was the only way USAPA was going to get anything outside of a merry trip to the NMB. I'm sure the American pilots will be thrilled to meet the geniuses who cost them a few boat payments' worth of negotiating leverage.

The APA has never led the industry in anything, excepting that fine for $45.5 million. I think in both cases it comes down to governance; it is easier for fear mongers and false prophets to get elected on either property, and the skills needed to win an election rarely complement those needed to actually run a union.

The coming seniority list integration will be the proof of this, and I hope they find a way to turn their ship into the wind and get another contract in ten years. Every airline pilot just dodged a bullet with the DOJ settlement.
Starcheck102 is offline  
Old 11-24-2013, 06:47 AM
  #8470  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
You bash DPA's plan as too vague...and they say ALPA's stance is "no different than what DPA states."

Does that make any sense to you?

Hang in there, johnso. You'll get there someday.
WRT scope you may be correct. But that's just the tip of the iceberg sir. ALPA has proven positive results. DPA is nothing more than hopes and dreams. I'm not willing to take the risk. I won't be convinced to either. I'm sticking with the long standing group that has a positive track record.

Once you learn to let go of the anger, and look at this from a realistic standpoint, then you'll understand. DPA claims that they will have more money.

How much interest Seham is charging?
Who will pay the bill?
How much MORE will the services ALPA provides us cost DPA members?
Has Seham and his firm ever negotiated a successful airline labor contract?
Why was the Seham firm fired by APA, SWAPA, and USAPA?
Why did DPA blindly accuse DALPA of hacking the DPA website without any proof? But they'll be immune from lawsuits?
What's the interest rate on DPA's $1 million line of credit?

DPA is claiming they'll have more money, without even factoring in unknown costs. And I've yet to see a successful independent pilot union outside of SWAPA. Too risky for me PD.

Last edited by johnso29; 11-24-2013 at 07:00 AM.
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices