Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2013, 07:55 AM
  #8351  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crewdawg52's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Right Seat 744
Posts: 946
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
How about a more real example. Did OJ Simpson's attorneys walk into the Courthouse and state "yeah, he did it" ?

No, they did their job; they defended their client, even though there were pretty concrete allegations that he had confessed to his Counsel. Their ethical responsibility was to represent their client as best they could, which they did to great success (for their client).

It is not a union's responsibility to do management, or the Fed's, jobs. A union has it's own job to do and job #1 is representing their pilots. Unions are held to a very high standard; expected to exercise a fiduciary duty (meaning putting their clients before themselves).

The fact that DPA supporters some how think a union has a right, or obligation, to participate in or promote harming the pilots in their care is yet another black and white indication the DPA has no idea what it is doing.

The DPA would be best served by admitting it called this one wrong.
Bucking Bar, you and ALPA remind me of Pelosi and Obama. ALPA and Obozo are always right, and tell no lies.

Last edited by crewdawg52; 11-20-2013 at 08:07 AM.
crewdawg52 is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 08:15 AM
  #8352  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Dorfman
Or draw the line the other way. How about an an airspeed violation, say going 270 at 5000. Do you call the Feds?
If it was unintentional, you have the crew fill out an ASAP. If it was intentional (and DPA or any union is the representing agent), then you get prostan involved and tell him that he's risking his job if he continues the behavior of violating FAR's. Nobody can help a pilot who intentionally violates FAR's.

Originally Posted by Dorfman
Or let's be more realistic about something that could happen. You get downstairs for the van pick up and the other guy had a bit much to drink. Do you tell him to call in sick or do you wait until you go through security and notify TSA or another Fed?
Assuming DPA is the representing union, you tell the guy to call in sick right this second, or you will do it for him. Then you call DPA and have the guy forcibly put into the HIMS program.

Originally Posted by Dorfman
The guy(s) who did this were wrong.
It appears nobody disagrees with that. Except Bucking Bar who blames this on DPA for existing.

Originally Posted by Dorfman
Should they get jail time or lose their job, I don't think so.
That's not ALPA's call, DPA's call or your call to make. It's the US attorney's call to make. I would submit a letter to the US attorney on their behalf asking to go easy on them.

Originally Posted by Dorfman
There is a lot of emotion on each side of this issue and both sides have done some pretty stupid things.
Sorry, can't let you do the whole "everybody's at fault here" deflection. DPA didn't break Federal law. Nobody at DPA wants this so bad that we'll break laws to get it. So no, only one side has done pretty stupid things.

Originally Posted by Dorfman
The best thing that can happen is for DPA to either call for a vote or roll up its tent. It's time for this group to unite and focus on C2015
The best thing that can happen is for DALPA to listen to what Kingsley Roberts was trying to tell them and shut down the Special Committee. Then DALPA should focus on being a union instead of a mouthpiece for Delta management. If DALPA would just do that, DPA could not be successful in the vote. But DALPA refuses to do this. Instead, they're hell bent on the tactics of Saul Alinsky's book Rules for Radicals.

It's sad to see DALPA slowly commit suicide.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 08:20 AM
  #8353  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crewdawg52's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Right Seat 744
Posts: 946
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler

It's sad to see DALPA slowly commit suicide.

Carl
No it's not.
crewdawg52 is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 08:27 AM
  #8354  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 365
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler


Sorry, can't let you do the whole "everybody's at fault here" deflection. DPA didn't break Federal law. Nobody at DPA wants this so bad that we'll break laws to get it. So no, only one side has done pretty stupid things.


Carl
I think you missed my point. Who ever hacked the DPA site is clearly at fault. However throughout this entire DPA vs ALPA there has been a lot of stupidity on both sides.
Dorfman is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 08:49 AM
  #8355  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
How about a more real example. Did OJ Simpson's attorneys walk into the Courthouse and state "yeah, he did it" ?
Real example? In who's world is that a real example. You know as well as I do that an attorney CANNOT lie for a client he knows to be guilty. The attorney can be disbarred and imprisoned for obstruction of justice. That's why attorney's could never say: "yeah, he did it". Instead, they ask the judge to be removed from the case, and then tell the client: "don't confess to your next attorney you idiot."

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
No, they did their job; they defended their client, even though there were pretty concrete allegations that he had confessed to his Counsel. Their ethical responsibility was to represent their client as best they could, which they did to great success (for their client).
Again, you KNOW better here Bar. You're purposely conflating an attorney with a union for the purposes of confusing this discussion. An attorney has attorney/client privileges so they have the right to defend a guilty client, but they still can't lie for him. A union has NO SUCH attorney/client privilege and cannot behave this way with a client who has broken Federal law. ALPA would never even think of putting itself in criminal jeopardy by defending a pilot who has broken Federal law.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
It is not a union's responsibility to do management, or the Fed's, jobs. A union has it's own job to do and job #1 is representing their pilots. Unions are held to a very high standard; expected to exercise a fiduciary duty (meaning putting their clients before themselves).
Exactly correct. Up to BUT NOT INCLUDING breaking the law. When that happens, the only thing a union can do for the guy is get him lawyered up and hope for the best for him.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 09:04 AM
  #8356  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The fact that DPA supporters some how think a union has a right, or obligation, to participate in or promote harming the pilots in their care is yet another black and white indication the DPA has no idea what it is doing.
Nobody but you thinks that Bar. DPA supporters do not believe a union has the right or obligation to participate in or promote harming the pilots in their care. There are no pilots yet in the DPA's care. DPA is not a union yet. DPA has no legal rights whatsoever to behave as a union yet. But even if we were the union, you CANNOT just fix the intentional breaking of Federal law by agreeing to keep things quiet. That is conspiracy to obstruct justice and would put all parties in criminal jeopardy.

I know you know this, but you're doing what any good far left radical does. I get that. I actually hope you continue this behavior, because I'm confident people see what you're trying to do here, and I must confess you're good at it. You're paying strict attention to Rules for Radicals. You never answer a question that would make you have to admit your fallacious statements, you continuously attack, and you blame the victim's existence for the reason this happened. I don't think the average airline pilot appreciates this level of dissembling. I think it works against you and your Special Committee handlers. But I know you'll keep it up to the bitter end.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The DPA would be best served by admitting it called this one wrong.
DPA did exactly what is required under law. You desperately want DPA to be part of a conspiracy to obstruct justice. And I can already hear you now if DPA was stupid enough to have done this: "Wow, unbelievable. DPA conspires to obstruct justice by trying to cover up the breaking of Federal law...and these guys think they were ready to represent Delta pilots over ALPA? Enjoy your jail time boys."

You're as transparent as a pane of glass Bar. It'll be interesting to see if you and your handlers can pull of an Obama-style coup of blaming Republicans and George W. Bush for all mistakes made by your crew.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 09:09 AM
  #8357  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg52
Bucking Bar, you and ALPA remind me of Pelosi and Obama. ALPA and Obozo are always right, and tell no lies.
Bucking Bar is playing right out of their rule book. It's an extremely cynical strategy of assuming everyone is a low information voter, and then misinform constituents into believing the other side is out to harm them. It's worked for Obama twice now, but the lies eventually catch up with you. It's happening now for Obama, it's happening now for DALPA.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 09:09 AM
  #8358  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

So when is the VOTE.........

GET IT DONE


That way we can focus on what is important..... our jobs......

Tired of the Johnson envy!!!!
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 09:31 AM
  #8359  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Carl,

I've never once said that whatever happened to the DPA's web site was right, legal, or smart. Such action was wrong, potentially illegal and dumb. It was also probably more of a prank than the Federal Case the DPA wants to make of it. If I would have advised against "playing games" with the DPA, simply because the DPA leadership is volatile and does just what they are doing.

Calling the Feds over a prank is extremely bad judgement. It smacks of the petty vindictiveness and lack of strategic thought that has imperiled the DPA movement from it's inception.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 09:33 AM
  #8360  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
It is not a union's responsibility to do management, or the Fed's, jobs.
Hahahaha! That's a good one, Bar! Union doing "management jobs." Yeah, that would NEVER happen with DALPA...
ROTFL
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices