Delta Pilots Association
#8351
How about a more real example. Did OJ Simpson's attorneys walk into the Courthouse and state "yeah, he did it" ?
No, they did their job; they defended their client, even though there were pretty concrete allegations that he had confessed to his Counsel. Their ethical responsibility was to represent their client as best they could, which they did to great success (for their client).
It is not a union's responsibility to do management, or the Fed's, jobs. A union has it's own job to do and job #1 is representing their pilots. Unions are held to a very high standard; expected to exercise a fiduciary duty (meaning putting their clients before themselves).
The fact that DPA supporters some how think a union has a right, or obligation, to participate in or promote harming the pilots in their care is yet another black and white indication the DPA has no idea what it is doing.
The DPA would be best served by admitting it called this one wrong.
No, they did their job; they defended their client, even though there were pretty concrete allegations that he had confessed to his Counsel. Their ethical responsibility was to represent their client as best they could, which they did to great success (for their client).
It is not a union's responsibility to do management, or the Fed's, jobs. A union has it's own job to do and job #1 is representing their pilots. Unions are held to a very high standard; expected to exercise a fiduciary duty (meaning putting their clients before themselves).
The fact that DPA supporters some how think a union has a right, or obligation, to participate in or promote harming the pilots in their care is yet another black and white indication the DPA has no idea what it is doing.
The DPA would be best served by admitting it called this one wrong.
Last edited by crewdawg52; 11-20-2013 at 08:07 AM.
#8352
It appears nobody disagrees with that. Except Bucking Bar who blames this on DPA for existing.
That's not ALPA's call, DPA's call or your call to make. It's the US attorney's call to make. I would submit a letter to the US attorney on their behalf asking to go easy on them.
It's sad to see DALPA slowly commit suicide.
Carl
#8354
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 365
I think you missed my point. Who ever hacked the DPA site is clearly at fault. However throughout this entire DPA vs ALPA there has been a lot of stupidity on both sides.
#8355
No, they did their job; they defended their client, even though there were pretty concrete allegations that he had confessed to his Counsel. Their ethical responsibility was to represent their client as best they could, which they did to great success (for their client).
It is not a union's responsibility to do management, or the Fed's, jobs. A union has it's own job to do and job #1 is representing their pilots. Unions are held to a very high standard; expected to exercise a fiduciary duty (meaning putting their clients before themselves).
Carl
#8356
I know you know this, but you're doing what any good far left radical does. I get that. I actually hope you continue this behavior, because I'm confident people see what you're trying to do here, and I must confess you're good at it. You're paying strict attention to Rules for Radicals. You never answer a question that would make you have to admit your fallacious statements, you continuously attack, and you blame the victim's existence for the reason this happened. I don't think the average airline pilot appreciates this level of dissembling. I think it works against you and your Special Committee handlers. But I know you'll keep it up to the bitter end.
You're as transparent as a pane of glass Bar. It'll be interesting to see if you and your handlers can pull of an Obama-style coup of blaming Republicans and George W. Bush for all mistakes made by your crew.
Carl
#8357
Carl
#8359
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Carl,
I've never once said that whatever happened to the DPA's web site was right, legal, or smart. Such action was wrong, potentially illegal and dumb. It was also probably more of a prank than the Federal Case the DPA wants to make of it. If I would have advised against "playing games" with the DPA, simply because the DPA leadership is volatile and does just what they are doing.
Calling the Feds over a prank is extremely bad judgement. It smacks of the petty vindictiveness and lack of strategic thought that has imperiled the DPA movement from it's inception.
I've never once said that whatever happened to the DPA's web site was right, legal, or smart. Such action was wrong, potentially illegal and dumb. It was also probably more of a prank than the Federal Case the DPA wants to make of it. If I would have advised against "playing games" with the DPA, simply because the DPA leadership is volatile and does just what they are doing.
Calling the Feds over a prank is extremely bad judgement. It smacks of the petty vindictiveness and lack of strategic thought that has imperiled the DPA movement from it's inception.
#8360
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM