Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2013, 10:50 AM
  #7851  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by Gearjerk
Manager,

Thank you for the level reply.

1) I agree that 4, 8.5, 3, 3 doesn't cut it.

2) I DO believe we can see restoration, & DO believe it should be a goal of our pilot group, the pilot profession, & industry as a whole,

BUT,

3) I don't believe the DPA plan of 'give us what we once had, or we'll burn the place down' will give us our NEEDED "restoration" any sooner than the path we're on.

Just my opinion.

thanks,

GJ

P.S. Scambo, I wrote a lengthy, respectful reply to your post. Prior to me submitting my reply, I was disconnected from APC. You'll just have to go with, "I want restoration too," just not the 'beating drum, beat down the door' restoration plan like DPA has offered as a strategy. That's all. Again, just my opinion.


I agree. The DPA plan is ridiculous. It is not a plan. The only time burning down the house was a good idea was in the settlers days. Torch it. Let the ashes cool. Gather the valuable nails, and set out towards the west where one could re-use the nails in the next cabin.

There is no value (nails) to be found in DPAs strategy. There are many strategies that an association could use to leverage our current situation to a better one. They obviously can not be discussed here.

On the flip side, DALPAs plan of small gains and TVM are not going to get the gains we need to get our investment back, at least in this decade and maybe not the next either. 5600+/- have said so. That is a poll where the results have been effectively released, unlike the other prominent poll/survey.

DALPA should recognize this and make course correction before it's too late. It might not be the DPA. But it will be somebody, whether it is an internal house cleaning and change or another yet to be named group, it will happen if they stay status quo.
TheManager is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 11:37 AM
  #7852  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
I agree. The DPA plan is ridiculous. It is not a plan. The only time burning down the house was a good idea was in the settlers days. Torch it. Let the ashes cool. Gather the valuable nails, and set out towards the west where one could re-use the nails in the next cabin.

There is no value (nails) to be found in DPAs strategy. There are many strategies that an association could use to leverage our current situation to a better one. They obviously can not be discussed here.

On the flip side, DALPAs plan of small gains and TVM are not going to get the gains we need to get our investment back, at least in this decade and maybe not the next either. 5600+/- have said so. That is a poll where the results have been effectively released, unlike the other prominent poll/survey.

DALPA should recognize this and make course correction before it's too late. It might not be the DPA. But it will be somebody, whether it is an internal house cleaning and change or another yet to be named group, it will happen if they stay status quo.

What is DALPA/ALPA doing now and for the last few years?

Trying to set the stage legislatively and with National policy so that when this cycle occurs with massive hiring, massive movement, and growth, combined with a profitable company they walk up to the plate with a larger bat that has a better chance of hitting a long ball.

C2K was after a few years of robust hiring and profits. C2015 will be after four or five years of robust profits, retuning to the S&P, dividends, stock buy back, debt well below 10 billion, margins in the double digits, and the rest of the US piloting profession on effective parity with us.

What sort of environment is that compared with last year; C2012?

Yep, much better.

How about C2K?

Quite similar.

Restoration of wages(hourly rates that do not add in profit sharing or DC) should be a goal by the amendable date if we do a deal early, and at or above the longer we go beyond it.

If the environment does not hit a black swan we should have the odds in our favor. DPA gone or a total non-starter comes in to play with that. If it's anything more than that, it will effect DALPA's ability to leverage the pilot group and their support to get across that goal line.

Time to put your efforts in to DALPA and see the long term strategic plan for what it is. Anything that subverts a pilots focus only hurts all of us.
Free Mason is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 01:10 PM
  #7853  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Free Mason
Anything that subverts a pilots focus only hurts all of us.
For example, the gratuitous recall of the MEC chairman?
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 01:11 PM
  #7854  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Free Mason

Time to put your efforts in to DALPA and see the long term strategic plan for what it is.
Are you sure you want us to do that?

I think we've seen what the "long term strategic plan" is, and if past performance is any indicator...it's worthless.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 01:25 PM
  #7855  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Are you sure you want us to do that?

I think we've seen what the "long term strategic plan" is, and if past performance is any indicator...it's worthless.
Strategic Plans do not promise results, I am sure you know that. Especially in this industry there are too many variables to make a promise.

Look up the definition of a strategic plan. Its about vision, process and strategy. From that comes tactics, and a game plan. Legislative activities that try to stop something or allow others to take place in a known environment is part of that. Seeking a three year deal last year to allow negotiations in the 2015-2016 timeframe is a tactic.

Setting up an environment that offers a better probability to translate the tactics and game plan in to results, is all strategy.

Any group that promises results or burns the place down if they can't attain them lacks strategic vision or a plan.
Free Mason is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 02:14 PM
  #7856  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Free Mason
Strategic Plans do not promise results
Of course ALPA's "strategic plans" yield results.

4833 is one result.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 02:25 PM
  #7857  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TenYearsGone's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 2,039
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Of course ALPA's "strategic plans" yield results.

4833 is one result.
Purple, please be factual. It is 4-8.5-3-3

TEN
TenYearsGone is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 02:27 PM
  #7858  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Of course ALPA's "strategic plans" yield results.

4833 is one result.
So was C2K.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 02:42 PM
  #7859  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
So was C2K.
So C2K is a valid starting point. Now we're getting somewhere.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 03:12 PM
  #7860  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Those percentages bother you, don't they. They should. It's a big deficit to overcome. (Unless you're not into overcoming the deficit.)

SWA didn't take a 42% pay cut. THAT is the difference in the success of their "little bite now and then" and our "little bite now and then." Different situations requiring different strategies. I think that's why it bothers you when I keep posting the percentages... because you know how big of a deficit it is, you don't think we can or should try to overcome it, and you don't want to admit publicly that you and DALPA think that way.
I'm not obsessed with it like you are. It is what it is. Arguing the reason and logic for the difference between us and SWA is pointless with you. It is fascinating that you refuse to asknowledge that they didn't go thru BK, and that they have only had 3 to maybe 4% pay increases for years and years, yet you seem to want to get it all back in one fell swoop. You want to swing for the fence. I get that. The only thing with that is that you don't want to accept the risk in that tactic. If your boys win, I'll accept that except that I will be demanding that you produce. From day one. I won't want to wait, and will not accept waiting for you to do so because you said that your plan is better. Put up or shut up.
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices