Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2011, 06:47 PM
  #7091  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Wow, struck a nerve there didn't I. You can always tell who is losing the argument by how many insults they throw. Right, if you can't think, then insult. I see Carl has taught you well. Your next step is to say "You don't know what you are talking about" and then hurl some more insults.
Hilarious. I suppose you call what I've bolded below just good old fashioned reasoned response:

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
We all wish we had this magic wand. I can tell that the magic wand does not exist sitting behind a keyboard spewing out hate and fear with populist diatribes. It does not exist in the simplistic solutions offered by the standard keyboard kowboys. It exists only in work. Grinding, day to day, stomp on one problem and six more appear, work. Work, work, work. That is what is takes. Alas, we can see that even when motivated by their own website, the DPA folks can't even do any work. Sit behind a keyboard and generate hate and fear. Yeah, that's a lot of work.
And this was in the very same post you used to talk about insults. Good times!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 06:53 PM
  #7092  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
Of course I see some positive things in DALPA. I think there are a ton of hard-working volunteers on various committees who are doing great stuff to help you and I. I am very grateful for their service. Guys will do the same, whether ALPA or DPA is our agent.

My issue is with the compensated DALPA folks who get a free trip to Herndon, get wined and dined (on our dime), baptized into the system. Do you know what those guys are briefed on, what they're promised (and what they promise in return) and how much they stand to lose if they get bounced? That's in addition to the "special" relationship they have with the company.
You are upset about relationships and expense accounts? Really? BFD. Free trips to Herndon Virginia.. woooo.. ranks right up there with Nice or Rome... But to answer your question, no I have no idea what they are briefed on because I have have not been asked to sign a NSD. I am sure they have and I do not expect nor do I want them to blab everything they are told in those meetings. You are assuming something nefarious going on, and that assumption is all conjecture, but what is dangerous is that you have such a strong belief that there is a fire in the theatre that it clouds any thoughts that there might actually be something good going on with these people. As I said before, I am no ALPA cheerleader, and I DO think that national is a bloated bureaucracy, but all I have seen from the alternate is promises of transparency that have yet to materialize.
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 06:58 PM
  #7093  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
I'll listen to DALPA if they pledge to never again accept FPL from the company, or waste our dues money on cushy boondoggles--and disclose how they spend every cent of our dues money. Oh, and agree to never send another cent to national....ever.

Until then, I'm not interested.
And the vitriol comes like a geyser to the surface. Nowhere in this post did you answer my question. You see smoke and automatically assume there was a nuclear conflagration. You are a lost cause, and there are those that will fit the bill the other way too. (ALPA can do no wrong) But nothing ALPA will ever do will satisfy you. That's OK.. good luck with your quest.
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 07:01 PM
  #7094  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
We've been "into it." I've stated my minimum opening before. But since you've apparently forgotten, here's a review:

Pay - 2004 (pre-paycut) rates + COLA for an opener. Or some combination of rates and work rules that results in a comparable W2 to 2004 + COLA. I would consider voting YES to an agreement that gets us SWA W2's +. As a review, that would be over $230K for a domestic narrowbody Captain and over $140k for a domestic narrowbody F/O.

Scope - Do not renew the DCI agreements as they expire. All flying of Delta passengers in aircraft painted with the Delta logo and in Delta colors must be done by Delta seniority list pilots. I would accept as a minimum all aircraft (jet or turboprop) with greater than 50 seats must be flown by Delta seniority list pilots.

Both of these items are crucial in order to get a YES vote from me.

As far as what it would take for you to support DPA. Why don't you email TC and ask him for your "no SLI dispute promise" letter? I have no doubt he would be willing to answer that question to your satisfaction. And if you're not willing to take this step after everything you've written about that issue... well, I don't have a lot of sympathy for your concern. Let us know what you find out.
I would venture to guess that you are going to be unhappy when this is all said and done. But I would still like to know how you think DPA will accomplish this if DALPA cannot.

PM me Tim's email address and I will do just what you suggest..
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 07:06 PM
  #7095  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I don't care what other pilot groups want, you stated it was a FACT that there is a conflict of interest and I proved you wrong. I didn't say I was concerned about it. So, you are wrong again.
You've proved nothing but your ability to state your blatantly false opinion.

ALPA legal representing us and the pilots of our direct regional competitors is the very definition of a conflict of interest. ALPA legal could be sued and even be convicted of a crime were it not for one thing: ALPA legal's defense would be that all ALPA members already know that they represent all sides, and as such, it amounts to "informed consent". With the claim of informed consent, a clear conflict of interest can be allowed in certain cases.

There is no question that ALPA legal operates in a conflict of interest. But in this case of informed consent, this conflict of interest is probably legal.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 07:10 PM
  #7096  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I would venture to guess that you are going to be unhappy when this is all said and done. But I would still like to know how you think DPA will accomplish this if DALPA cannot.
Ah, that's a distinction that I meant to make in my earlier post. There's a difference between being unhappy with someone because they tried and failed and being unhappy with someone because they didn't even try. I'm going to have to see DALPA trying (sincerely trying) to achieve restoration of our careers. If they really put an obvious all-out effort into achieving this objective (which they are going to have to first define and communicate... duh), then I won't be mad at them if they fail for reasons beyond their control. Now, if they keep going like they've been going... which is refusing to advocate restoration and even arguing against it... then yes you are right I will be unhappy with them. But to say I'm not going to be happy with ALPA no matter what... That's just not a fair or true statement.

Originally Posted by tsquare
PM me Tim's email address and I will do just what you suggest..
Will do.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 07:13 PM
  #7097  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
So let's assume that these other carriers change their tune at the drop of the hat. What is the substance of the Ford-Cooksey settlement. Let's put it in other terms to show perspective. Our contract is opening in April. Would you accept these terms to determine our future compensation?

  1. Delta management forms a Compensation Committee to discuss our compensation. Delta pilots are invited to the committee to meet and confer.
  2. If no consensus is reached, then Delta management gets to set our compensation to whatever level they feel is appropriate.
  3. If the Delta pilots don't like what management decides, then they can appeal to the Delta Board of Directors
If that doesn't seem appealing to you, then I just described the Ford-Cooksey settlement.


It is a nothing burger.
I prefer to just post the actual language, and let the members decide if they think it's nothing:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Prior to commencement of any bargaining for any ALPA pilot group within a mainline/express system, the applicable Negotiating Committee will meet with the Negotiating Committees of other ALPA pilot groups in the mainline/express system to review opening scope proposals and how they advance ALPA's scope goals and guidelines. The committees will work with each other to develop a consensus on proposals; if, however, they are unable to do so, subsection 3a below will apply:

a. Following consultation as specified above, and prior to submission of the scope proposal to the airline, the applicable negotiating committee will report to the Scope Subcommittee that ALPA pilot groups have consulted with one another and have or have not reached consensus that the planned scope proposal meets ALPA's scope goals and guidelines; if the latter, Negotiating Committees of other ALPA pilot groups within the system can submit statements of agreement or disagreement to the Scope Subcommittee, which can recommend changes following consultations with the Negotiating Committees involved.

b. The applicable Negotiating Committees and ALPA pilot groups within the mainline/express system will develop in conjuction with the opening proposal agreed reporting benchmarks with respect to developments in on-going scope negotiations which will require that the Negotiating Committee provide updates on the status of scope negotiations to the Scope Subcommittee. In the absesnce of consensual agreements concerning benchmarks, the Scope Subcommittee will determine reporting benchmarks.

4. During the period that final approval of a collective bargaining agreement is subject to Presidential review under the Constitution and By-Laws, MEC designated representatives of all ALPA pilot groups within the mainline/express system may submit comments prior to the Presidential signature concerning conformity of negotiated scope provisions with recommendations of the Scope Subcommittee and Association policy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 07:13 PM
  #7098  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You've proved nothing but your ability to state your blatantly false opinion.

ALPA legal representing us and the pilots of our direct regional competitors is the very definition of a conflict of interest. ALPA legal could be sued and even be convicted of a crime were it not for one thing: ALPA legal's defense would be that all ALPA members already know that they represent all sides, and as such, it amounts to "informed consent". With the claim of informed consent, a clear conflict of interest can be allowed in certain cases.

There is no question that ALPA legal operates in a conflict of interest. But in this case of informed consent, this conflict of interest is probably legal.

Carl
Yeah, legal but stupid on our part.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 07:27 PM
  #7099  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Ah, that's a distinction that I meant to make in my earlier post. There's a difference between being unhappy with someone because they tried and failed and being unhappy with someone because they didn't even try. I'm going to have to see DALPA trying (sincerely trying) to achieve restoration of our careers. If they really put an obvious all-out effort into achieving this objective (which they are going to have to first define and communicate... duh), then I won't be mad at them if they fail for reasons beyond their control. Now, if they keep going like they've been going... which is refusing to advocate restoration and even arguing against it... then yes you are right I will be unhappy with them. But to say I'm not going to be happy with ALPA no matter what... That's just not a fair or true statement.



Will do.
So before you start pulling the scuttle plug on the ship, wouldn't it be worthwhile to at least see how the openings are going. While we might not see the actual openings.. we will have a good idea of how stiff it was by management's reaction. I really don't wanting them to telegraph their intentions at this point in time, it is still 3 months away from that time. As it gets closer, I expect the rhetoric flame to be turned up. Patience grasshopper... We are gonna get into this crap soon enough.
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-21-2011, 07:27 PM
  #7100  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
What you have done with your DPA is take a situation where pilots are stressed and uncertain and exploited that using fear. We exit bankruptcy, we have a merger, new bases, new procedures, new aircraft, displacements along with aircraft moving around the system. Pilots are uprooted by change and uncertainty.

So, like any good populist you come along to exploit the fear. You put up a website. You scour the forums and find any topic that creates anxiety in pilots. You create this magic entity "DPA" that promises to magically fix every problem in the world. How. "By being for Delta pilots only."
Interesting logic here. With your blatantly wrong accusation, you're also implying that Delta pilots are capable of being swayed by "populism" and "exploited by fear" since 4,100 of us have signed cards. But more importantly, you fail to understand that even if your false accusations of DPA were true, none of those terrible motives would have garnered a single card were it not for ALPA's utter failures in so many ways.

Until you can admit to yourself that ALPA has failed us in many ways, you'll never understand why 4,100 plus highly educated pilot peers of yours could have been swayed away from such a successful union like ALPA.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices