Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2011, 04:06 PM
  #6671  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Now I understand. You want MORE than the SWAPA contract, for your super premium wide body. Fair enough, just admit it.
I want premiums above SWA for everyone. I've been saying that from the beginning.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:07 PM
  #6672  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Still in one
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Now I understand. You want MORE than the SWAPA contract, for your super premium wide body. Fair enough, just admit it.
So are you saying a WB (767+) pilot should not make more than a SWA 737A?
TANSTAAFL is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:11 PM
  #6673  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
So are you saying a WB (767+) pilot should not make more than a SWA 737A?

Not to mention that 777 and 747 Captains on reserve make LESS than MANY SWA FO's.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:13 PM
  #6674  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
PG;

Whats your wish list? I know we have common ground somewhere. Is it just job security or is there more to your equation?
Scope: Not one more seat, not one more pound, not one more jet
Pay: SWA+, and indexed up for bigger jets
Sick Leave: get rid of 75% rule
Reserve: put seniority back in reserve
Medical: lower medical premiums for all, especially retirees

What's yours?
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:16 PM
  #6675  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Scope: Not one more seat, not one more pound, not one more jet
Pay: SWA+, and indexed up for bigger jets
Sick Leave: get rid of 75% rule
Reserve: put seniority back in reserve
Medical: lower medical premiums for all, especially retirees

What's yours?
This is good, PG. Now what's your beef with Carl again?
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:18 PM
  #6676  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Scope: Not one more seat, not one more pound, not one more jet
Pay: SWA+, and indexed up for bigger jets
Sick Leave: get rid of 75% rule
Reserve: put seniority back in reserve
Medical: lower medical premiums for all, especially retirees

What's yours?

See, we do have common ground. I put all of the above in my contract survey except I also said: scope reeled in (recapture flying), Do away with the Alaska open ended non-restriction, 401k to the 415c limit (do your letters to washington), etc.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:18 PM
  #6677  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
The negotiating school of thought that says its better to get a 5/4/4/4 contract now than to suffer under the status quo for years. I thought you were of that opinion, but maybe I'm confusing you with someone else.
Yes, I'll take 5/4/4/4 over 0/0/0/0. And you wouldn't?

Originally Posted by gloopy
Anyway the problem with that theory is if that stratedgy is to be followed, we have already reached our peak.
I disagree.

Originally Posted by gloopy
Either way we can't wait decades for SWA parity plus just because they waited decades for DL parity plus. SWA plus reasonable premiums in all areas is a DOS necessity. I will wait as long as it takes, and strike as long as it takes, however long it takes to get to that point, to achieve that bare bones minimum. And that includes scope.
So, what you are saying is, IF IT IS NOT ACHIEVABLE, you would prefer 0/0/0/0/3/1/1/1 as it now looks like APA is looking at, as opposed to 5/4/4/4. Sorry, I'm not interested.

I think we can achieve SWA+ in the upcoming contract, BUT, if it becomes obvious we cannot, then I'll take something rather than nothing. Again, IF AND ONLY IF, it becomes obvious we can't achieve that, I'm willing to accept something rather than nothing.

You guys can take the APA path, and sit there waiting for what's "fair"... never achieving it... but somehow thinking you won. Unbelievable.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:19 PM
  #6678  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
So are you saying a WB (767+) pilot should not make more than a SWA 737A?
No - I'm simply saying if we want the SWAPA contract, then the top rate is $210/hr. I want MORE than the SWAPA contract.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:21 PM
  #6679  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Yes, I'll take 5/4/4/4 over 0/0/0/0. And you wouldn't?



I disagree.



So, what you are saying is, IF IT IS NOT ACHIEVABLE, you would prefer 0/0/0/0/3/1/1/1 as it now looks like APA is looking at, as opposed to 5/4/4/4. Sorry, I'm not interested.

I think we can achieve SWA+ in the upcoming contract, BUT, if it becomes obvious we cannot, then I'll take something rather than nothing. Again, IF AND ONLY IF, it becomes obvious we can't achieve that, I'm willing to accept something rather than nothing.

You guys can take the APA path, and sit there waiting for what's "fair"... never achieving it... but somehow thinking you won. Unbelievable.

I dont think thats what Gloopy is saying. I think he is saying what you are saying.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:22 PM
  #6680  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
This is good, PG. Now what's your beef with Carl again?
The big beef I have with both you and Carl, is you both think if we just set an objective of XX, then we can achieve it, without any consideration of the negotiating environment, economic environment, financial strength of Delta, industry peer group, etc. etc. etc.

I have my own goals and objectives; but I am also a realist. If we can achieve those --- great. If it becomes obvious we cannot, I'd rather take something than nothing.

As the APA strategy is now entering the final stages, all of you that were so proud of them standing firm, really need to reassess the strategy of "standing firm until i get what I want". In the end, APA stood firm, but NEVER got what they wanted.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices