Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2011, 02:08 AM
  #6391  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Really? And let me guess, with FPL as well.
As you correctly state below, we can't prove the FPL because ALPA still refuses the will of numerous LEC's. But it's hard to imagine that a guy would lose 4 days of pay to volunteer for ALPA "duty" during the ATL lounge week.

Originally Posted by TheManager
So, where are the FPL reports that were requested by the numerous resolutions sent to the MEC? And while we are at it, how about that promised AF/KLM wage and benefit comparison?
You're right. I'm going to submit a resolution...oh wait...

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 02:48 AM
  #6392  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Still in one
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Considering the envrionment and the situation, I find the lack of DPA activity in the LEC arena pretty indicitive of their effectiveness as a stand alone organization.

There is no greater joy for people subject to bad management then kicking a CEO out of his own office.

That's the opportunity that the DPA is missing out on. Giving the boot to a couple of borgified LEC reps, dumping the MEC Chair in a noisy special MEC meeting and then firing all of the committee chairs you don't like would be just as joyful, if not more so, than getting rid of ALPA.

It would be orders of magnitude easier than a whole certification deal and you get to keep all of the cash, the MCF, and the neato office furniture on Virginia Ave.

You could then call ALPA National and lay the law down, or you would take your 12k members and walk across the street to the UFXUPSAADAPA...the union born out CAPA.

This is such a prefered alternative, that it leads me to believe that the DPA is simply ego driven, and not worthy of my august support.

Nu
You nailed it.

The mechanisms to change your own union if you don't like it have always been there, and considerably less effort than creating a new union. In fact the current Church of Moak came into power by forcing the recall of the previous Chairman. The fact that 3500+ (supposed) DPA supporters have not rallied to do as you suggest is a stark example of their potential lack of effectiveness as a future bargaining agent. With the numbers they have they could literally own this MEC.

They have utterly failed to rise to the occasion and fill the shoes they profess to wear, and have my scorn as a result. If anything the DPA has helped DALPA as it now gives them another propaganda flag to wrap themselves in while exercising McCarthyism on any who would dare to disagree with them.
TANSTAAFL is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 06:18 AM
  #6393  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Considering the envrionment and the situation, I find the lack of DPA activity in the LEC arena pretty indicitive of their effectiveness as a stand alone organization.

There is no greater joy for people subject to bad management then kicking a CEO out of his own office.

That's the opportunity that the DPA is missing out on. Giving the boot to a couple of borgified LEC reps, dumping the MEC Chair in a noisy special MEC meeting and then firing all of the committee chairs you don't like would be just as joyful, if not more so, than getting rid of ALPA.

It would be orders of magnitude easier than a whole certification deal and you get to keep all of the cash, the MCF, and the neato office furniture on Virginia Ave.

You could then call ALPA National and lay the law down, or you would take your 12k members and walk across the street to the UFXUPSAADAPA...the union born out CAPA.

This is such a prefered alternative, that it leads me to believe that the DPA is simply ego driven, and not worthy of my august support.

Nu
Excellent post.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 06:20 AM
  #6394  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Seniority Block Representation ?

If we ever grow, how would the DPA ensure junior pilots receive the benefit of experienced representation? Don't junior pilots deserve the same representation that mid level pilots deserve? What if at the senior end, it is difficult to find someone who retains the drive to engage in union representation?

At the end of the day, ALPA is a product of Delta pilot leadership. The DPA is not going to be substantially different because it is substantially the same. It repeats the same historical errors and follows the same political currents. But the DPA is much less experienced and draws from shallow resources. The representational change, if it happens, will do the same things with less efficacy. If the DPA knew "how to fix it" they would engage in just the sort of action Nu and TANSTAF advocate.

Who ever has the representational job, they are going to have to negotiate in an environment where American's contract is likely going to come under concessionary pressure and US Air's contract remains garbage.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 09-27-2011 at 06:37 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 10:30 AM
  #6395  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,913
Default

The Tranny guys are showing how easy it is to recall reps. They've got a few going on the ballot now.

It is such a ridiculously easy process that the DPA could have had the entire slate of LEC reps recalled by now (maybe some twice!), and they'd have their own people in.

This is just a side show distracting from the change that could happen.

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:03 AM
  #6396  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
The Tranny guys are showing how easy it is to recall reps. They've got a few going on the ballot now.

It is such a ridiculously easy process that the DPA could have had the entire slate of LEC reps recalled by now (maybe some twice!), and they'd have their own people in.

This is just a side show distracting from the change that could happen.

Nu
Nu, I agree, and have said the same thing in the past. They like to point fingers but not undertake ANY constructive actions, only potentially destructive action. It's time to put up or shut up.

Also, anyone that thinks all the reps are "koolaid drinking expectation managers" need to take a look at the last LEC66 newsletter. The Reps up there "get it".
shiznit is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:06 AM
  #6397  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
The Tranny guys are showing how easy it is to recall reps. They've got a few going on the ballot now.

It is such a ridiculously easy process that the DPA could have had the entire slate of LEC reps recalled by now (maybe some twice!), and they'd have their own people in.

This is just a side show distracting from the change that could happen.

Nu
I agree 100%. I have said it so many times I lost count.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:39 AM
  #6398  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

We (all) tend to be a pretty apathetic group anyway though, don't we? I mean try and find 3500 ALPA supporters at an airline to "rally" for anything. How many ALPA supporters even show up for meetings? (And that's with a 70+ year head start and tons of resources).

If the DPA is to be effective, they need to somehow awaken the sleeping giant that is all of us. The same can be said for ALPA though.
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 07:21 AM
  #6399  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Nu, I agree, and have said the same thing in the past. They like to point fingers but not undertake ANY constructive actions, only potentially destructive action. It's time to put up or shut up.
This again? There's been so many responses to this drivel, yet you ALPA apologists just keep restating it like you've just discovered a new thought. So for the hundredth plus time: it's not so much about DALPA, it's about ALPA. We can recall all the reps we want and it wouldn't matter. ALPA national would love nothing more than you spinning your wheels thinking you're accomplishing something. When it's all said and done, you're still stuck with the same broken, self-interested union that brought us to this place. The place where our own scope language cannot be negotiated without a multi-step process involving regional unions and the ALPA president. A union that has attempted union busting and succeeded in working against it's own members at TWA.

Originally Posted by shiznit
Also, anyone that thinks all the reps are "koolaid drinking expectation managers" need to take a look at the last LEC66 newsletter. The Reps up there "get it".
Again, you're only making my point. Whether some local rep gets it or not is immaterial to ALPA. The locals are the temporary help. The permanent bureaucracy is ALPA. They'll be here after all your recall elections and they know it. They control your money and access to expertise. If what a local council wanted actually mattered, we'd know about everyone's flight pay loss. ALPA national doesn't want you to know that...so you won't.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 09:15 AM
  #6400  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Road construction signholder
Posts: 2,439
Default

In fact the current Church of Moak came into power by forcing the recall of the previous Chairman.
I like your post, but this is incorrect. Lee Moak ran for MEC Chair against his predecessor as part of a regularly scheduled election. I thought it was a mistake at the time, and still do, but that is another discussion.

Unless I misunderstood your point?
Herkflyr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices