Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2011, 03:52 PM
  #6311  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nerd2009's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Delta M88 A ATL
Posts: 383
Default

I am in the ATL Pilot lounge, and only see one other DPA green tag including mine.

Walking through the terminal , I do see some. Just wonder if DPA members are proudly displaying their green tags or hiding them when in the pilot lounge ?
nerd2009 is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 06:19 PM
  #6312  
Gets Weekends Off
 
exeagle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: DL
Posts: 154
Default

Originally Posted by nerd2009
I am in the ATL Pilot lounge, and only see one other DPA green tag including mine.

Walking through the terminal , I do see some. Just wonder if DPA members are proudly displaying their green tags or hiding them when in the pilot lounge ?
I saw one last trip, and zero this trip. I was a bit surprised.
exeagle is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 07:26 PM
  #6313  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Carl, I've said it before and I'll say it again. What ALPA did to their internal union is unacceptable, and heads should roll.
And I appreciate you saying that PG. It shows me that you really do call them as you see them.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
As for the TWA pilots, ALPA may have done some inappropriate things after the fact, but you will never convince me the TWA leadership didn't know exactly what they were doing at the time,
I think you're right about that, but it was absolutely NOT the point of the lawsuit. At the end of the process, the TWA guys did know exactly what was going to happen. The problem was: How did the TWA guys get into that position? There was clear evidence of the TWA guys trying to sue under a statute that would have protected them, but ALPA refused to fund that effort. There was also clear evidence that ALPA destroyed computers, servers and hard drives to try and cover that up. That among other reasons is why the jury found in favor of the TWA pilots. Again, TWA pilots did indeed know what would happen, but it was because they saw they had no representation at the end.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
just like the USAir East guys.
I disagree on that comparison. The UsAir east situation was totally different, and I don't believe ALPA did anything wrong there.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Pilot's are very good at passing the buck, and finding someone else to blame for their own bad decisions.
That's not my experience with most pilots. While there are a few that exhibit that behavior, the vast majority of pilots are quick to tell the truth and fess up to their mistakes. Sometimes, the FAA and management use that basic attribute of pilots against us.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 07:28 PM
  #6314  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Name that image:



Thinking "Constructive Engagement Downside"

or "Company vs Pilot Negotiators"
Or, "Trying to get a pig's attention"...aka, "Carl's dating habits"

Carl

Last edited by Carl Spackler; 09-12-2011 at 07:54 PM.
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 07:38 PM
  #6315  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by zoomiezombie
I think the idea that every nickel of Delta dues MUST be used for Delta pilots runs contrary to the concept of organized labor standing together for progress.
I respectfully disagree. This is not Socialism. Organized labor can and should stand together to enact change. But each union must stand on its own merits and own finances before it can stand together with other unions. If you can't run your own affairs without the constant financing from others, you aren't a viable union.

Originally Posted by zoomiezombie
I for one am proud that some of my dues money supported the Spirit pilots and I expect the DAL negotiations will be a little easier because of the progress made by the Spirit pilots.
I am too, but helping to fund a strike contingency is totally different than a continuous funding model that depends on other unions financing your daily operations. That's what we have now, and it's wrong.

Originally Posted by zoomiezombie
Therefore:
I support ALPA's efforts to work with Washington and Wall Street and virtually whomever else is necessary to stabilize the industry,
I do too. I just wish ALPA had results of their Washington and Wall Street efforts. Unfortunately, I do not see much if any.

Originally Posted by zoomiezombie
and, I support ALPA's efforts to work across the various airline pilot groups to restore the profession.
I do too. CAPA does the same thing among their member unions. But that's different than funding them. The fact that Delta pilots get less than 40% of their dues money back from ALPA national is wrong. Period.

Originally Posted by zoomiezombie
"No man is an island"

Do you see things differently?
Agreed. But no man should be another man's ATM.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 07:49 PM
  #6316  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
1. The RJ/RFP/Outsource debacle.
ALPA represents mainline carriers as well as regional carriers both vying for the same work. Anyone who claims there isn't strong pressure to preserve this status quo instead of eliminating it is kidding themselves. And BTW pre-committing to seniority integration without a staple prenup is a 100% non starter.
This is a bit off topic, but it's an important point. There is no such thing as a staple prenup. Just like a marital prenup, it MUST be later judged to not be "unconscionable". This term has been used to negate marital prenups, and the same legal tenet is available to anyone in the case of a staple prenup. In both cases, the fact that the parties signed the agreement makes no difference. If the plaintiff's attorney is able to successfully claim that the prenup was so egregious that it "Shocks the Conscience", it can be considered legally unconscionable and a judge will overturn the prenup. Then you'll have to go to plan B (arbitration, negotiations, etc.).

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 07:53 PM
  #6317  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by nerd2009
I am in the ATL Pilot lounge, and only see one other DPA green tag including mine.

Walking through the terminal , I do see some. Just wonder if DPA members are proudly displaying their green tags or hiding them when in the pilot lounge ?
You just about can't be a stronger supporter of our effort to create an in-house union than I am, but I don't have a bag tag yet. Not that I am un-proud of the DPA, I just don't have a tag. I'll have to get one though. Thanks for reminding me.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 09:47 PM
  #6318  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
This is a bit off topic, but it's an important point. There is no such thing as a staple prenup. Just like a marital prenup, it MUST be later judged to not be "unconscionable". This term has been used to negate marital prenups, and the same legal tenet is available to anyone in the case of a staple prenup. In both cases, the fact that the parties signed the agreement makes no difference. If the plaintiff's attorney is able to successfully claim that the prenup was so egregious that it "Shocks the Conscience", it can be considered legally unconscionable and a judge will overturn the prenup. Then you'll have to go to plan B (arbitration, negotiations, etc.).

Carl
Yeah that's a scary proposition for sure. We can't afford to reach the event horizon on what could be a powerful black hole and then hope it all works out somehow. One way or the other, any chance of a land grab has to be 100% mitigated or its a non starter. If that can't be assured, there are other ways to achieve the same result on our end, like taking the flying back, on our certificate or on a brand new one with new hires if necessary. If that would lead to a potential DFR situation, then ALPA has to go. ALPA needs to prove that it can, at least theoretically, fix scope without a single seniority jump on any mainline list.
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 10:01 PM
  #6319  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Yeah that's a scary proposition for sure. We can't afford to reach the event horizon on what could be a powerful black hole and then hope it all works out somehow. One way or the other, any chance of a land grab has to be 100% mitigated or its a non starter. If that can't be assured, there are other ways to achieve the same result on our end, like taking the flying back, on our certificate or on a brand new one with new hires if necessary. If that would lead to a potential DFR situation, then ALPA has to go. ALPA needs to prove that it can, at least theoretically, fix scope without a single seniority jump on any mainline list.
Totally agree.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-13-2011, 08:39 AM
  #6320  
Gets Weekends Off
 
X Rated's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD80
Posts: 394
Default

Pineapple Guy obviously hasn't read the Court Transcript.
X Rated is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices