Delta Pilots Association
05-23-2011, 07:38 AM
#5543
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,902
05-23-2011, 07:50 AM
#5544
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
05-23-2011, 07:51 AM
#5545
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Pretty straight forward, Nu. Here are the facts that Alfa claimed:
1. The TWA MEC had spent every dime of their dues and had been given millions more in OCF and MCF grants.
2. Their final request came for a request from the MCF to file a federal lawsuit.
3. MCF money can only go for specific items related to contract negotiation and strike. It can't be used for lawsuits.
4. The TWA MEC willingly signed onto the agreement to be purchased by American.
Please tell me which of these is not true, and provide some evidence to support that claim. Is that easy enough to understand?
1. The TWA MEC had spent every dime of their dues and had been given millions more in OCF and MCF grants.
2. Their final request came for a request from the MCF to file a federal lawsuit.
3. MCF money can only go for specific items related to contract negotiation and strike. It can't be used for lawsuits.
4. The TWA MEC willingly signed onto the agreement to be purchased by American.
Please tell me which of these is not true, and provide some evidence to support that claim. Is that easy enough to understand?
05-23-2011, 10:58 AM
#5546
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
The TWA MEC had spent every dime of their dues and had been given millions more in OCF and MCF grants. Their final request came for a request from the MCF to file a federal lawsuit. MCF money can only go for specific items related to contract negotiation and strike. It can't be used for lawsuits.
"Why would you give them a whole lot of money if they're not going to be part of ALPA?"
The TWA MEC willingly signed onto the agreement to be purchased by American and then decided they wanted to look backwards and blame everyone else. Their claim is that other people "bullied" them into it. Wow, their main defense is that they were too weak to stand up for their own interests. Excellent move.
So, the facts are that the TWA spent every dime of dues money they ever paid. They were given millions more of OUR money to help them out. They screwed the pooch royally in their pursuit of an SLI and wanted to spend more of OUR money to cover their tracks. And by the way, their lawsuit was a bunch of crap also, just like this one.
Carl
05-23-2011, 01:26 PM
#5547
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Read the Seham report instead of your ALPA talking points. The report is highly sourced and footnoted. If there is ANY falsehoods whatsoever in that report, then post it. I'd like to see it...and ALPA would as well.
No. This could only be said by someone who hasn't read the Seham report. Read it.
No. This could only be said by someone who hasn't read the Seham report. Read it.
Just so you have the other side of the story.
05-23-2011, 03:22 PM
#5548
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
I have. And you should read the ALPA reply found here: TWAPilot
Just so you have the other side of the story.
Just so you have the other side of the story.
Carl
05-24-2011, 11:17 AM
#5549
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
The DFR suit identifies the defendant in the judgement as:
ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION, ET
AL.,
Defendants.
AL.,
Defendants.
1. This matter appears before the Court upon Defendant Air
Line Pilots Association’s Motion to Decertify Plaintiffs’ Class
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(1)(C). For the reasons set
forth below, the Court will deny Defendant’s motion.
Line Pilots Association’s Motion to Decertify Plaintiffs’ Class
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(1)(C). For the reasons set
forth below, the Court will deny Defendant’s motion.
Thank you for the clarification.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
