Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2011, 02:56 PM
  #5451  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,913
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
^^^

Very accurate post.

The Delta side felt Compass was a mess, it was not their mess and they did not want to mess with it. The resulting vote went down pre-merger lines communicating to management the fracture in our MEC.
Heyas Bar,

Chalk that up to the "not invented here" mentality of a certain segment of the MEC.

This same segment DOES reflect the makeup of the pilots. The same pilots we see on the webboard that carry the same attitude towards everything that is not "of the body", and can't for one second think outside the box.

Despite the will of some of the pilots (from both sides), several resolutions, and clear experience with what management (both DAL and NWA) has done in the past, they STILL went down the same tired path, doing what THEY wanted to do, without even thinking about considering another course of action or point of view.

And of course it has led us to the exact same spot as it has before.

What surprises me is that any of you are surprised at any of this.

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 03:04 PM
  #5452  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Heyas Bar,

Chalk that up to the "not invented here" mentality of a certain segment of the MEC.

This same segment DOES reflect the makeup of the pilots. The same pilots we see on the webboard that carry the same attitude towards everything that is not "of the body", and can't for one second think outside the box.

Despite the will of some of the pilots (from both sides), several resolutions, and clear experience with what management (both DAL and NWA) has done in the past, they STILL went down the same tired path, doing what THEY wanted to do, without even thinking about considering another course of action or point of view.

And of course it has led us to the exact same spot as it has before.

What surprises me is that any of you are surprised at any of this.

Nu
Of course you are correct. I was not surprised. But like a good First Officer I figure it is my job to speak up when I see potential harm. I do that job.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 03:22 PM
  #5453  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,913
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Of course you are correct. I was not surprised. But like a good First Officer I figure it is my job to speak up when I see potential harm. I do that job.
So the $64,000 question is when do you consider the "captain" incapacitated and take control or mash on the brakes?

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 04:18 PM
  #5454  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 460
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Look Bar, you weren't even around when this nightmare started...I was. The "Bargaining Credits" headlines that you constantly trumpet only happened at the end of the nightmare just prior to bankruptcy at NWA. That term in our union letter was a way to save face by our union negotiators who were faced with negotiating with a gun to their heads.
The concept of bargaining credits for scope giveaways has been around since at least the late '90s. It's one of the things that the jokers at the RJDC used to talk about so often, complaining that mainline pilots were just thinking of them as "bargaining credits" to get bigger pay raises. When pilot negotiators were looking for big pay increases, management cried poor and said that they couldn't afford those sorts of increases to their payroll. But surprise, I great idea came up! "We'll give you a "bargaining credit" of $100 million if you agree to allow X number of 70-seaters to be outsourced." Suddenly $100 million existed to be added to the pay rate tables, and pilots, being greedy and shortsighted as always, jumped at the opportunity.

When bankruptcy rolled around, the bargaining credit concept wasn't used to offset the effects of pay raises anymore, it was instead used to give the union credit for cost cuts that the company demanded and claimed in bankruptcy court that they needed. It was always the same concept, just applied differently whether it was a good bargaining cycle or a concessionary bargaining cycle.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 04:35 PM
  #5455  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
So the $64,000 question is when do you consider the "captain" incapacitated and take control or mash on the brakes?

Nu
Depends on who the captain is.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 07:46 PM
  #5456  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
ALPA is very quick to state the legal limitations which prevent it from doing it's primary mission of protecting pilots jobs, seniority and longevity. This primary mission is the most important work ALPA does. Not only is this work critical to us, it is critical work to ensure the association's survival.
That is very, very true.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
As written before, outsourcing is a fatal poison to any union. The fact we have this thread here, while over on the regional board several similar threads are in motion openly discussing voting ALPA off the property are obvious signs ALPA has been snake bit.
That is very, very, very true.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The antidote is obvious to us on this board. Step one, return to the basics of representation. Realize that a union's power is dependent entirely on each and every precious represented member. Make decisions in light of expanding that power.
No, step 1 is to even articulate that as a goal. At that, ALPA has failed and has continued to fail by not even mentioning the word outsourcing. Of course, ALPA doesn't feel like their IS outsourcing...because they represent all sides. You know, that "alleged" conflict of interest.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 07:54 PM
  #5457  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
I'm looking for the actual case files of a bankruptcy that happened several years ago, when I find them, I will post them here. they are about a steel company that tried to use bankruptcy to get out of its union scope contract and hire outsourced workers. After a long legal battle and several appeals, it was ruled that scope relief is illegal by any means unless the workers specifically agree to it. Forced scope relief by the company interferes with the right of American workers to form labor unions.

In other words, ALPA's crack legal team failed to tell you that management was not allowed to touch section 1 during bankruptcy. I wonder why?????
That is a very interesting and puzzling question.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 08:05 PM
  #5458  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Two points:

1. "ALPA" doesn't do anything. Pilots make decisions, then the national organization gets unfairly blamed for decisions made by pilots at the local level. ALPA is not some all-powerful entity that forces pilots to make certain decisions. Pilots ignore the advice of the attorneys almost as often as they follow it, and it almost always bites them in the ass later when they do. The decision to sell scope was not made by ALPA national officers, or ALPA attorneys, or anyone else with an office in Herndon or on Massachusetts Ave. It was made by Negotiating Committees, MECs, and pilot groups at each individual airline.
What utter BS! This entire paragraph is such a distortion of reality, it borders on a flat out lie.

The locals depend a great deal on national for everything from funding to legal and financial experts...not to mention negotiations "experts". For you to insinuate that pilots make all the decisions and "ALPA doesn't do anything" is utterly false and you know it. The truth is that ALPA national has ALWAYS managed the process of local decision making by complete control of finances and experts. The new ALPA president flat out stated that his highest priority in negotiations is to "use all of ALPA national's resources to ensure that contracts benefit the profession as a whole...and not be self-serving.

Your post is a shameful distortion.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 08:18 PM
  #5459  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Pilots were idiots to sell the scope in the first place, but now we have to decide what we're willing to pay to get it back.
It's easy for you to talk from your hindsight perch. We were having to make these tough calls when you were busy paying for your job at some south florida bottom feeder. We were told that our airline couldn't survive without their ability to do what American was doing with AmericanEagle. Further, we were absolutely assured by management and ALPA national "experts" that feeding the hubs with RJ's was absolutely essential, and would actually grow the majors by feeding hubs. Hindsight shows that we were suckered. We pilots were suckered, and ALPA national was suckered.

I know how important it is for you to insult pilots as "idiots"...especially senior major pilots, but you're just showing your ignorance of history.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 08:22 PM
  #5460  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Those documents could have been easily found by you with a simple Google search, Carl. Before spouting off and pretending to be an authority on something, you may want to collect the facts next time.
I was the one asking YOU to produce evidence to back up what you were claiming. I was asking you for this because I was not claiming to be an authority. It took you months to produce a link for evidence.

I ask a lot of questions because I'm not an expert.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices