Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2011, 03:46 AM
  #5071  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
This statement is false. The Frontier/Republic merger proves that. 2001-hire Frontier captains were merged in with 2004-hire Republic captains that were making less than the Frontier captain's first officer. Given that our regionals are now flying the equivalent of DC-9's, merging with them would not be a straight staple. Straight staples do not happen anymore. There are no exceptions to that rule.
Here's a little bit of heresy, but would that be so bad? Would absorbing 1300 Pinnacle guys to bring that flying back in house be too much of a sacrifice? As a bottom of the list guy I would be the most impacted by more people coming on top but it might be worth it to recapture outsourced small jet flying. It might not even go to arbitration. Cut them a good enough deal and we could avoid that wild card.

Frontier/RAH is not a totaly valid example. Frontier was a distress sale.
satchip is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 04:05 AM
  #5072  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
You're in luck! There is a group like this!!! Here's their web site: www.delta-pilots.org

Maybe you should consider sending in a card and putting your energies into helping someone who is open to making changes!
How many cards do they have 2000? 2500? Aren't half of them expiring soon and need to be renewed? Still well short of what is needed to even get a ballot.

While I appreciate their desire to change even if I don't agree with the method, so far it appears they are even less effective than ALPA at changing the way business is done.

The only message that is being sent to ALPA is that they are not a serious threat and that ALPA can continue business as usual.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 04:08 AM
  #5073  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
That was the "risk" in 2000 when our leadership took us down this road.

To achieve unity mergers are a necessary evil. Does anyone think Northwest should have been operated as a subsidiary? Why are the regional carriers any different?

We have to have some faith in ALPAs' merger policy. Windfalls are not supposed to happen. If you merge Delta with almost any regional by paycheck or equipment, the result is a staple.

ACL65 is a big supporter of "sunset" provisions, while I doubt we can do that. What I'd prefer is simply better scope language that controls staffing, not necessarily operational control. IE I don't care who OPERATES "Delta Flying" as long as a Delta seniority list pilot is at the controls. IMHO Delta seniority list pilots should be staffing Delta Private Jet Charters as well as Republic flying under the Delta brand.

The reason for my strategy is that it continues to allow the company the flexibility it wants to run its various businesses. I want Delta to make money. At the same time I do not want to allow them loopholes big enough to run 747 charter flights through.

If you are at Mesaba, I want you to have a Delta seniority number and longevity. Your career should not be re-set just because you work at a different division serving a common Corporation. As a union, we need to remove the incentive to constantly destroy and re create divisions within our brand which serve little purpose than to destroy longevity and our careers.
Bar;
You and I have discussed that as well. We do not care how Delta organizes their financial backing for their aircraft, we only care about the fact that a Delta Pilot is flying those jets. Ergo, DAL cannot afford X jet and wants another airline to "own" them, that is their business, but we will be flying them. We do not care who the "owner" is on that little piece of paper next to the door, we just want to the be the pilot group flying them.

That makes a ton of sense, and should be one of the avenues we explore. We also need to look at sun-setting these ASA's, so that we put in place a proviso that stops the continued renewal of these agreements. You have to have both of these concepts take hold to move beyond the position we are in now. Can the concepts and contractual provisions be a little different than a true sunset? Yep, they sure can, but you have to have written commitments from the company that will transcend leadership teams that commit the airline to stopping outsourcing and start in-sourcing their product. Most of this is debt driven, and not pilot driven. It is all about money and the appearance of financial health.

Like you and I have said, first you need the commitment to engage in this, and then you need the support. Either way, the current practices will need to change as the current generation of RJ's becomes obsolete in the next ten years. We sell the next generation of small gauge or we hold the ground. We decide to unify as pilots not as separate pilot groups against this model, or frankly nothing will change.

I understand the idea of not wanting our RJ brothers and sisters no have to reset longevity, that is important. Longevity and seniority are totally different.

On the Republic/F9 deal, simply put being the acquiring carrier carriers a lot of weight as it did in this SLI.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 04:54 AM
  #5074  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Splash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: Boeing Boss
Posts: 335
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
The only message that is being sent to ALPA is that they are not a serious threat and that ALPA can continue business as usual.
Your perspective has lured me back into the fray. I think you have nailed the unforeseen consequences of the failure of the organizers. As soon as the DPA time line started sliding, and they began announcing some card numbers, I started hearing the fall back claim of "success".

I'm not sure the organizers and supporters understand that their crusade could deepen the flaws. When it's all over I predict none of them will be willing to be accountable for that.
Splash is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 07:32 AM
  #5075  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
... simply put being the acquiring carrier carriers a lot of weight as it did in this SLI.
Which "this" do you refer? Surely you do not mean Delta & NWA do you?

Frankly, all that merger proved is being a minority affords the luxury of being much tougher in negotiations and arbitration. Being the majority requires a much more conservative position to avoid harm on a macro basis.

Powerful minorities can be tactical. Majorities have to be strategic.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 07:39 AM
  #5076  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
This statement is false. The Frontier/Republic merger proves that. 2001-hire Frontier captains were merged in with 2004-hire Republic captains that were making less than the Frontier captain's first officer. Given that our regionals are now flying the equivalent of DC-9's, merging with them would not be a straight staple. Straight staples do not happen anymore. There are no exceptions to that rule.
+1^

...more characters added
TOGA LK is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 07:43 AM
  #5077  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
How many cards do they have 2000? 2500? Aren't half of them expiring soon and need to be renewed?
Well, I guess it depends on your definition of "soon." From the DPA FAQ's:

Is it true that DPA is running up against a deadline in May?

There is no deadline for the completion of our campaign. We have a minor limitation placed on us by the National Mediation Board that requires all Authorization Cards submitted be no older than one year from the date on the application for a vote. My Card is the oldest Card on file with a date of May 15th, 2010. The first 100 Cards were not in hand until late August. All Cards can be updated by resubmitting a new Card and destroying the old one. Should our campaign move into the fall, DPA will contact our oldest and most dedicated members and request they submit an updated Card. Let’s work together to finish our campaign before that extra work becomes necessary.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 10:38 AM
  #5078  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
How many cards do they have 2000? 2500? Aren't half of them expiring soon and need to be renewed? Still well short of what is needed to even get a ballot.

While I appreciate their desire to change even if I don't agree with the method, so far it appears they are even less effective than ALPA at changing the way business is done.

The only message that is being sent to ALPA is that they are not a serious threat and that ALPA can continue business as usual.
We could always invite in the Teamsters.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 10:52 AM
  #5079  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Carl, LEC's routinely communicate anything/everything they want. Just look at the stuff coming out of SEA. They don't get cut off by the MEC.

Do you EVER bother checking your facts before posting?
Is it even POSSIBLE for you to pay attention to the conversation? We're talking about LEC's ability to communicate to the entire membership. Of course LEC's can speak to their own local without very much oversight from the MEC. But said LEC member cannot speak to the entire membership without that communication being edited for "accuracy" and other things by the MEC.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 11:09 AM
  #5080  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Splash
Your perspective has lured me back into the fray. I think you have nailed the unforeseen consequences of the failure of the organizers.
Do you even bother to think about the obvious and foreseen consequences of not enforcing our own Section 1? Or do you just enjoy humping the legs of those trying to implement change?

Originally Posted by Splash
I'm not sure the organizers and supporters understand that their crusade could deepen the flaws.
I don't see how our action could possibly further deepen the flaws in ALPA.

Originally Posted by Splash
When it's all over I predict none of them will be willing to be accountable for that.
What a ridiculous statement. ALPA's flaws may well be deepened by trying to organize an in-house union...and those of us trying to do that should be held accountable for ALPA's continuing and deepening flaws?

The clear translation here is: Don't do ANYTHING to try and change of our union's because it might make an already bad situation worse.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices