Delta Pilots Association
#5071
This statement is false. The Frontier/Republic merger proves that. 2001-hire Frontier captains were merged in with 2004-hire Republic captains that were making less than the Frontier captain's first officer. Given that our regionals are now flying the equivalent of DC-9's, merging with them would not be a straight staple. Straight staples do not happen anymore. There are no exceptions to that rule.
Frontier/RAH is not a totaly valid example. Frontier was a distress sale.
#5072
You're in luck! There is a group like this!!! Here's their web site: www.delta-pilots.org
Maybe you should consider sending in a card and putting your energies into helping someone who is open to making changes!
Maybe you should consider sending in a card and putting your energies into helping someone who is open to making changes!
While I appreciate their desire to change even if I don't agree with the method, so far it appears they are even less effective than ALPA at changing the way business is done.
The only message that is being sent to ALPA is that they are not a serious threat and that ALPA can continue business as usual.
#5073
That was the "risk" in 2000 when our leadership took us down this road.
To achieve unity mergers are a necessary evil. Does anyone think Northwest should have been operated as a subsidiary? Why are the regional carriers any different?
We have to have some faith in ALPAs' merger policy. Windfalls are not supposed to happen. If you merge Delta with almost any regional by paycheck or equipment, the result is a staple.
ACL65 is a big supporter of "sunset" provisions, while I doubt we can do that. What I'd prefer is simply better scope language that controls staffing, not necessarily operational control. IE I don't care who OPERATES "Delta Flying" as long as a Delta seniority list pilot is at the controls. IMHO Delta seniority list pilots should be staffing Delta Private Jet Charters as well as Republic flying under the Delta brand.
The reason for my strategy is that it continues to allow the company the flexibility it wants to run its various businesses. I want Delta to make money. At the same time I do not want to allow them loopholes big enough to run 747 charter flights through.
If you are at Mesaba, I want you to have a Delta seniority number and longevity. Your career should not be re-set just because you work at a different division serving a common Corporation. As a union, we need to remove the incentive to constantly destroy and re create divisions within our brand which serve little purpose than to destroy longevity and our careers.
To achieve unity mergers are a necessary evil. Does anyone think Northwest should have been operated as a subsidiary? Why are the regional carriers any different?
We have to have some faith in ALPAs' merger policy. Windfalls are not supposed to happen. If you merge Delta with almost any regional by paycheck or equipment, the result is a staple.
ACL65 is a big supporter of "sunset" provisions, while I doubt we can do that. What I'd prefer is simply better scope language that controls staffing, not necessarily operational control. IE I don't care who OPERATES "Delta Flying" as long as a Delta seniority list pilot is at the controls. IMHO Delta seniority list pilots should be staffing Delta Private Jet Charters as well as Republic flying under the Delta brand.
The reason for my strategy is that it continues to allow the company the flexibility it wants to run its various businesses. I want Delta to make money. At the same time I do not want to allow them loopholes big enough to run 747 charter flights through.
If you are at Mesaba, I want you to have a Delta seniority number and longevity. Your career should not be re-set just because you work at a different division serving a common Corporation. As a union, we need to remove the incentive to constantly destroy and re create divisions within our brand which serve little purpose than to destroy longevity and our careers.
You and I have discussed that as well. We do not care how Delta organizes their financial backing for their aircraft, we only care about the fact that a Delta Pilot is flying those jets. Ergo, DAL cannot afford X jet and wants another airline to "own" them, that is their business, but we will be flying them. We do not care who the "owner" is on that little piece of paper next to the door, we just want to the be the pilot group flying them.
That makes a ton of sense, and should be one of the avenues we explore. We also need to look at sun-setting these ASA's, so that we put in place a proviso that stops the continued renewal of these agreements. You have to have both of these concepts take hold to move beyond the position we are in now. Can the concepts and contractual provisions be a little different than a true sunset? Yep, they sure can, but you have to have written commitments from the company that will transcend leadership teams that commit the airline to stopping outsourcing and start in-sourcing their product. Most of this is debt driven, and not pilot driven. It is all about money and the appearance of financial health.
Like you and I have said, first you need the commitment to engage in this, and then you need the support. Either way, the current practices will need to change as the current generation of RJ's becomes obsolete in the next ten years. We sell the next generation of small gauge or we hold the ground. We decide to unify as pilots not as separate pilot groups against this model, or frankly nothing will change.
I understand the idea of not wanting our RJ brothers and sisters no have to reset longevity, that is important. Longevity and seniority are totally different.
On the Republic/F9 deal, simply put being the acquiring carrier carriers a lot of weight as it did in this SLI.
#5074
I'm not sure the organizers and supporters understand that their crusade could deepen the flaws. When it's all over I predict none of them will be willing to be accountable for that.
#5075
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Frankly, all that merger proved is being a minority affords the luxury of being much tougher in negotiations and arbitration. Being the majority requires a much more conservative position to avoid harm on a macro basis.
Powerful minorities can be tactical. Majorities have to be strategic.
#5076
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
This statement is false. The Frontier/Republic merger proves that. 2001-hire Frontier captains were merged in with 2004-hire Republic captains that were making less than the Frontier captain's first officer. Given that our regionals are now flying the equivalent of DC-9's, merging with them would not be a straight staple. Straight staples do not happen anymore. There are no exceptions to that rule.
...more characters added
#5077
Is it true that DPA is running up against a deadline in May?
There is no deadline for the completion of our campaign. We have a minor limitation placed on us by the National Mediation Board that requires all Authorization Cards submitted be no older than one year from the date on the application for a vote. My Card is the oldest Card on file with a date of May 15th, 2010. The first 100 Cards were not in hand until late August. All Cards can be updated by resubmitting a new Card and destroying the old one. Should our campaign move into the fall, DPA will contact our oldest and most dedicated members and request they submit an updated Card. Let’s work together to finish our campaign before that extra work becomes necessary.
#5078
How many cards do they have 2000? 2500? Aren't half of them expiring soon and need to be renewed? Still well short of what is needed to even get a ballot.
While I appreciate their desire to change even if I don't agree with the method, so far it appears they are even less effective than ALPA at changing the way business is done.
The only message that is being sent to ALPA is that they are not a serious threat and that ALPA can continue business as usual.
While I appreciate their desire to change even if I don't agree with the method, so far it appears they are even less effective than ALPA at changing the way business is done.
The only message that is being sent to ALPA is that they are not a serious threat and that ALPA can continue business as usual.
#5079
Carl
#5080
The clear translation here is: Don't do ANYTHING to try and change of our union's because it might make an already bad situation worse.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM