Delta Pilots Association
#4921
Carl
#4923
DPA has done a number of "official acts" since their inception over a year ago. This act was simply giving evidence to management in ATL. Just like the dozens of similar acts done by DALPA all week long. But you don't count that because DALPA did it...right alfa?
The Russian Revolution was a people's revolution and their aim was to take back their lives from the privileged aristocrats. The first thing Lenin did when he took power, was to start persecuting anyone deemed counter-revolutionary, which meant anyone who criticized the new government. Now we see the DPA start the purges even before they take power.
ALPA tried to bust their union...and lost the lawsuit to the tune of 700,000 dollars plus. To me, it's far worse for a union to try to bust a union. You obviously disagree.
This is not the company or the government, this is the union trying prosecute their own pilots. Most recently, the USAPA President had two elected reps taken out of their meeting by the police, because they disagreed with his policies. USAPA will not publish communications from the elected reps unless they "toe the party line" and they reserve the right to edit or delete anything that the President doesn't like. ALPA's constitution guarantees each elected rep the right to communicate with his pilots.
So, before you go signing up for DPA, maybe you should find out how they are going to deal with dissent. After the revolution are they then going to start the persecution of 'counter revolutionaries?" Is criticism of the union or its officers going to be cause for them to get you fired? How will we get rid of this group if they make dissent a firing offense?
This is the most disturbing fact that I ever seen come out of this DPA. They can lie and distort about ALPA and the ALPA volunteers, I almost expect that, but how can anyone justify trying to get a fellow pilot fired because they said mean things about this so called union.
1. Too weak to fight against the new FT/DT rules
2. Too weak to grieve our Section 1 violation against RAH
3. Too weak in its positions to allow free speech
4. Too weak to allow free association without treating Delta pilots like scabs
5. Too weak to fight for the 1500 hour rule
6. Strong enough to try to bust their own in-house union...but predictable enough to have lost.
Carl
#4924
To summarize, ALPA's legal representation is the same counsel that tried to break ALPA's in-house union. Things that make you go EEEEWWWWW.
No need to spin, just the facts will do.
Carl
#4925
Well thanks for that, at least. I promise you I'm not making it up. I was just in the ATL pilot lounge earlier today and ANOTHER pilot who was there relayed the same story to me. He is also someone who I trust and believe is very credible. Yes, it's "hearsay" on a web board... so you can choose to believe it or not. All I know is what I have read in the report and heard from two different pilots (who don't even know each other BTW) who were there and shared essentially the exact same story with the exact same details.
Last edited by DAL 88 Driver; 04-17-2011 at 07:59 PM.
#4926
Do you guys REALLY want to go down that road?? After Lee Moak forwarded an article, which was written by one of our pilots, to a Delta executive... and that pilot got called into the office and threatened with his job? What is that saying about people in glass houses?
#4927
Again, you nor I were not there. Unless you can provide the actual deposition that certifies the facts, you are speculating.
It appears that if DPA's accusations are true, they need to be heard and addressed....but not with the company. I believe that is why we have a little committee called Professional Standards.
I really am amazed at the length ALPA is going to discredit (Wilson Polling, amateur photography, counter lounge tactics, web campaign, etc.) DPA.
If they put the same energy into listening to their constituents and explaining how they are representing our concerns and needs, we wouldn't even have this thread.
#4928
[QUOTE=DAL 88 Driver;981883]Do you guys REALLY want to go down that road?? After Lee Moak forwarded an article, which was written by one of our pilots, to a Delta executive... and that pilot got called into the office and threatened with his job? What is that saying about people in glass houses?]
Can you expand on that at all? Would it have been an article/post written by a pilot that has experienced the effects of radiation up close and personal. If so, I would find that extremely disturbing.
Can you expand on that at all? Would it have been an article/post written by a pilot that has experienced the effects of radiation up close and personal. If so, I would find that extremely disturbing.
#4929
[QUOTE=TheManager;981888]
No, not that person. This was an article written about 5 or 6 years ago (during Delta's bankruptcy) by a Captain who has an independent business serving a lot of clients who are Delta employees. The article was published on his web site and I believe it was also distributed to his clients via email. Sickeningly... my understanding is that it was also "distributed" to a Delta executive via Lee Moak.
Do you guys REALLY want to go down that road?? After Lee Moak forwarded an article, which was written by one of our pilots, to a Delta executive... and that pilot got called into the office and threatened with his job? What is that saying about people in glass houses?]
Can you expand on that at all? Would it have been an article/post written by a pilot that has experienced the effects of radiation up close and personal. If so, I would find that extremely disturbing.
Can you expand on that at all? Would it have been an article/post written by a pilot that has experienced the effects of radiation up close and personal. If so, I would find that extremely disturbing.
#4930
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
No, not that person. This was an article written about 5 or 6 years ago (during Delta's bankruptcy) by a Captain who has an independent business serving a lot of clients who are Delta employees. The article was published on his web site and I believe it was also distributed to his clients via email. Sickeningly... my understanding is that it was also "distributed" to a Delta executive via Lee Moak.
MS posted that article on the public website for his "financial services" business. He put it on the ALPA forum. He e-mailed it to a wide distribution channel, many of whom were management that he met while working as an instructor/4th floor guy. He was a good friend of JK (an EVP at the time). You think somebody else in management that he actually sent the article to might have noticed the fantasy that he put out? But in your world it's always Moak's fault.
Is this the best you DPA'ers got? Are you unable to address the fact that DPA collected evidence that in their own writings acknowledge putting Delta pilot jobs at risk...right now...? Shows a lot of character, just not the type your mommy could be proud of.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM