Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2011, 08:45 PM
  #4531  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

That is everyone's choice to either support or not support the PAC, I just would like the playing field level with ATA and others, and it costs money.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 02:16 PM
  #4532  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
What do you want to educate the lawmakers on?
Humility?????
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 02:16 PM
  #4533  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by dragon
The discussion was what should our national be doing on our behalf and why should we support ALPA-PAC.

I don't see any reason to support ALPA-PAC since ALPA can use money to educate the lawmakers on whatever they seem to think is important because based on what I've seen most didn't want age 65 yet ALPA was behind it etc.

ALPA-PAC just wants to buy votes and based on the list of folks they gave to last election cycle http://www.alpa.org/portals/alpa/dep...ts_1-14-11.pdf I don't want to give money to them.
This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 02:44 PM
  #4534  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Can we join SWAPA? I love their scope section:
A. SCOPE
This Agreement is made and entered into between Southwest Airlines Co. (hereinafter known as the "Company") and the Southwest Airlines Pilots' Association (hereinafter known as the "Association"). This Agreement covers all revenue and miscellaneous flying, performed with aircraft owned or leased by the Company, or which displays Company markings, including all flying in and for the service of the Company and its affiliates. All flying covered by this Agreement shall be performed by pilots whose names appear on the Southwest Airlines Master Pilot Seniority List, except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement.

The purpose of this Agreement, in the mutual interest of the Company and the Association, is to provide for the operation of the Company under methods which will further, to the fullest extent possible, the safety of air transportation, the efficiency of operation and the continuation of employment of all pilots under safe and reasonable working conditions and proper compensation. It is recognized to be the duty of the Company, the Association and the employees to cooperate fully, reasonably, and in good faith for the attainment of these purposes.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 03:33 PM
  #4535  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Can we join SWAPA? I love their scope section:
What about the statement: All flying covered by this Agreement shall be performed by pilots whose names appear on the Southwest Airlines Master Pilot Seniority List, except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement.

The except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement....what else is provided for?
iceman49 is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 03:40 PM
  #4536  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,704
Default

It does not really matter what else is in the agreement. SWAPA did not really have to negotiate for anything since the companies business plan did not want or require RJ's. You don't need feed in a point to point operation. That may well change in the next 10 years as the SW operations shifts however even today it is for the most part point to point.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 04:16 PM
  #4537  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Didn't AT sign deals for RJ outsourced lift prior to the merger though? What happens to them? And didn't the AT TA agree to 84 seat jet outsourcing?

To not keep an eye on this simply because of some concept of "corporate culture" or business model is ill advised.
gloopy is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 05:14 PM
  #4538  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
It does not really matter what else is in the agreement. SWAPA did not really have to negotiate for anything since the companies business plan did not want or require RJ's. You don't need feed in a point to point operation. That may well change in the next 10 years as the SW operations shifts however even today it is for the most part point to point.
Southwest flows passengers across its hubs, just as we do. They flow 42% of their passengers who connect through Midway. That's a hub Bro. It ain't point 2 point. Other SWA hubs and connecting flow:

PHX - 40.3%
DEN - 35%
BWI - 39%
HOU - 35%
LAS - 34%

Interestingly, I took your premise and ran it through my little data engine. Turns out Northwest and Delta had a greater difference between O&D v/s flow passengers than Delta and SWA do. This is probably as a result of Delta and SWA having hubs in stronger O&D markets than NWA did. Passenger flows do not rationalize our scope. The common denominator in DAL & NWA scope is ALPA.

Southwest IS more efficient at pilot staffing because they are not having to flow NINE different pilot seniority lists across their domestic route network. That efficiency translates into dollars for their pilots. They are well represented by NOT outsourcing their work.

Come on Sailing, the numbers bear me out. Get on board, get Tim on board. Lets turn this thing around.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-27-2011 at 05:46 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 05:15 PM
  #4539  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Didn't AT sign deals for RJ outsourced lift prior to the merger though? What happens to them? And didn't the AT TA agree to 84 seat jet outsourcing?
Yes and it lost money. They flushed it.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 05:17 PM
  #4540  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
What about the statement: All flying covered by this Agreement shall be performed by pilots whose names appear on the Southwest Airlines Master Pilot Seniority List, except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement.

The except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement....what else is provided for?
Nothing.

Those two paragraphs I posted are the entire scope section.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices