Delta Pilots Association
#3811
I don't think they do. DPA being adequately prepared for Sec 6 is not my only concern. I really don't think they can handle a lot larger, looming issues such as cabatoge, foreign ownership, & fighting off the likes of Emirates & Quantas. We as a pilot group have a lot more to worry about then restoration.
#3812
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: No to large RJs
Posts: 369
Yes, I'm sure that would be fine with the Carl's of the world. Riiiggghhtt. How about we do both and not sacrifice one for the other. We all want to see issues handled other than restoration. How is sacrificing restoration going to improve our lot with regards to any other of these major issues.
#3813
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Yes, I'm sure that would be fine with the Carl's of the world. Riiiggghhtt. How about we do both and not sacrifice one for the other. We all want to see issues handled other than restoration. How is sacrificing restoration going to improve our lot with regards to any other of these major issues.
#3814
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 593
Who's on the financial oversight committee? Have they posted their finances like they promised? Where's their promised transparency?
#3815
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
That is not correct. DPA in their question and answer section posted a question that asked if they would be ready to represent the pilots and had enough time to build the funding needed. Their reply stated that they needed and expected to have 51 percent by the end of the year and that would allow a election in the spring and DPA representation by summer. Did they meet their own deadline?
#3816
Then how about at least posting the DPA reps for each base? It's still showing 7 of 9 bases with no names.
#3817
DPA's issue is that they do not present an organization that has the support structure that can effectively represent 12,000+ pilots on day one. It can't plain and simple. For that reason the effort is appearing amateurish to many of the guys I fly with.
They may not like what ALPA has done, but they sure as heck do not want to start over with an organization that seems to be going for the emotional response.
DPA needs to show how they are structured, finances, support structure, the contracts they have lined up for support services, the quality of those support services, the cost of those services, the rep structure, the by-laws, the political action structure, the regulatory compliance and oversight structure, the safety structure and to many more to list
They have a road map, and the reality is that a road map, though needed, is not the level of organization that is needed for 51%+ of any group of individuals to sign their future career expectations to.
If they started their drive with this level of organization and went from there it would be one thing, but the goal is to get their some day after a vote.
for DAL88;
After talking to many of my friends that I had reported who asked for their cards to returned, this was one of the major issues. They all felt their careers would be hurt by de-certifying ALPA.
They may not like what ALPA has done, but they sure as heck do not want to start over with an organization that seems to be going for the emotional response.
DPA needs to show how they are structured, finances, support structure, the contracts they have lined up for support services, the quality of those support services, the cost of those services, the rep structure, the by-laws, the political action structure, the regulatory compliance and oversight structure, the safety structure and to many more to list
They have a road map, and the reality is that a road map, though needed, is not the level of organization that is needed for 51%+ of any group of individuals to sign their future career expectations to.
If they started their drive with this level of organization and went from there it would be one thing, but the goal is to get their some day after a vote.
for DAL88;
After talking to many of my friends that I had reported who asked for their cards to returned, this was one of the major issues. They all felt their careers would be hurt by de-certifying ALPA.
#3818
DPA needs to show how they are structured, finances, support structure, the contracts they have lined up for support services, the quality of those support services, the cost of those services, the rep structure, the by-laws, the political action structure, the regulatory compliance and oversight structure, the safety structure and to many more to list
They have a road map, and the reality is that a road map, though needed, is not the level of organization that is needed for 51%+ of any group of individuals to sign their future career expectations to.
They have a road map, and the reality is that a road map, though needed, is not the level of organization that is needed for 51%+ of any group of individuals to sign their future career expectations to.
Carl
#3819
Carl;
No spin needed, and as you know I do not speak for him. What I can tell you is that I support change from within. I support his intent on listening to the pilots and performing their will. I support getting back to basics, and that is something I have championed for a long time. Transparency is process. Nothing is simpler than that.
I want ALL pilots involved in the process. I want the process and debate to be heated and messy. That is the way it is designed to be. I want pilots compelled to get involved. Not to sit on the side line for whatever reason. It is my belief that after talking to our new Master Chair he wants involvement and education for all pilots.
We will disagree on many issues this way, but that is OK. It is part of the process. A process that has served our pilots over 75 years. Getting back to basics is what is needed.
I do not need to spin anything, the process and informed and engaged pilots should take care of what needs to be taken care of.
No spin needed, and as you know I do not speak for him. What I can tell you is that I support change from within. I support his intent on listening to the pilots and performing their will. I support getting back to basics, and that is something I have championed for a long time. Transparency is process. Nothing is simpler than that.
I want ALL pilots involved in the process. I want the process and debate to be heated and messy. That is the way it is designed to be. I want pilots compelled to get involved. Not to sit on the side line for whatever reason. It is my belief that after talking to our new Master Chair he wants involvement and education for all pilots.
We will disagree on many issues this way, but that is OK. It is part of the process. A process that has served our pilots over 75 years. Getting back to basics is what is needed.
I do not need to spin anything, the process and informed and engaged pilots should take care of what needs to be taken care of.
#3820
Carl;
No spin needed, and as you know I do not speak for him. What I can tell you is that I support change from within. I support his intent on listening to the pilots and performing their will. I support getting back to basics, and that is something I have championed for a long time. Transparency is process. Nothing is simpler than that.
I want ALL pilots involved in the process. I want the process and debate to be heated and messy. That is the way it is designed to be. I want pilots compelled to get involved. Not to sit on the side line for whatever reason. It is my belief that after talking to our new Master Chair he wants involvement and education for all pilots.
We will disagree on many issues this way, but that is OK. It is part of the process. A process that has served our pilots over 75 years. Getting back to basics is what is needed.
I do not need to spin anything, the process and informed and engaged pilots should take care of what needs to be taken care of.
No spin needed, and as you know I do not speak for him. What I can tell you is that I support change from within. I support his intent on listening to the pilots and performing their will. I support getting back to basics, and that is something I have championed for a long time. Transparency is process. Nothing is simpler than that.
I want ALL pilots involved in the process. I want the process and debate to be heated and messy. That is the way it is designed to be. I want pilots compelled to get involved. Not to sit on the side line for whatever reason. It is my belief that after talking to our new Master Chair he wants involvement and education for all pilots.
We will disagree on many issues this way, but that is OK. It is part of the process. A process that has served our pilots over 75 years. Getting back to basics is what is needed.
I do not need to spin anything, the process and informed and engaged pilots should take care of what needs to be taken care of.
Here's what you and O'Malley don't get: The education is not needed from ALPA to the members, the education is needed from the members to ALPA! It only matters what WE want. I don't give a damn what THEY want. Everone I know sees outsourcing as a scourge. O'Malley refused to mention the topic of our time. Spin on dude.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM