Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2010, 04:39 AM
  #3491  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

I guess I just go shut up and color.
satchip is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 06:43 AM
  #3492  
Gets Weekends Off
 
finis72's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 777 Sim Instructor
Posts: 745
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
I guess I just go shut up and color.
Satch, I am way senior and I would strike in a heartbeat over any scope sales,period. I might differ a little with a lot of people on here in that I think trying to buy back scope presents some problems and is a double edged sword. A large part of the problem will go away on its own with higher fuel prices and crowded airports. It will be interesting to see what the new UAL does in this regard because that will give us a good idea on the future lay of the land.
Keep posting, if everybody on here agreed on different items these threads would have died long ago.
finis72 is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:30 AM
  #3493  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
I guess I just go shut up and color.
I agree with Finis.

It is actually good to have your position on here. If anything, the response should make you realize that the senior guys get scope too. Talk to the guys you fly with. I have had the occasional one that is willing to sell anything for his alimony payment, but the fact is that most realize after the last decade that scope thus far has been permanent and pay has been temporary.

Everyone would "like" the buying power of C2k, no doubt about it, but the majority of pilots at Delta are willing to wait and see what the conditions dictate. Margins in the upper single digits to lower double digits combined with what APA and UALALPA do will play in to that.


As for what we buy back or do not buy back. Scope is unity. Simple as that. Bring the flying back in house and you can command the pay rates that may expect because you corner the market on Delta flying. We as a pilot group need to answer "yes" to the "IF" before we worry about the "how."
The how has may options but it takes resolve for the "if"

Last edited by acl65pilot; 12-10-2010 at 07:46 AM.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:36 AM
  #3494  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by satchip

Why is my repeated concern for job protection and security whining when some others repeated lamentations about pay rates not?
That is a pretty good point.
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:42 AM
  #3495  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Thanks for the clarification.

You are making a lot of assumptions that may or may not turn out to be true. I'd rather make my objective and my resolve to achieve my objective clear from the start. Your "pattern bargaining" strategy is like a ship without power and a rudder... just floating along and depending on the currents to take you in the general direction of where you want to go.

Hindsight is always 20/20. I'm just not willing to put the future of my career in someone else's hands based on a crystal ball prediction.
So you aren't doing this with DPA? DPA has zero track record, no ties in D.C., & nothing more then a crystal ball prediction.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:50 AM
  #3496  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Everyone would "like" the buying power of C2k, no doubt about it, but the majority of pilots at Delta are willing to wait and see what the conditions dictate.
I agree with you on scope but could not disagree more with this statement! In fact, if this thinking is representative of our current MEC, then it pretty much solidifies my inclination that ALPA is incapable of representing us and that a change is warranted. It is very rare and unlikely to achieve anything difficult and significant by adopting a "wait and see" attitude! Can't you see why this is wrong?
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:52 AM
  #3497  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
I agree with you on scope but could not disagree more with this statement! In fact, if this thinking is representative of our current MEC, then it pretty much solidifies my inclination that ALPA is incapable of representing us and that a change is warranted. It is very rare and unlikely to achieve anything difficult and significant by adopting a "wait and see" attitude! Can't you see why this is wrong?

^^^^^^^^^ Agree!
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:54 AM
  #3498  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
I agree with you on scope but could not disagree more with this statement! In fact, if this thinking is representative of our current MEC, then it pretty much solidifies my inclination that ALPA is incapable of representing us and that a change is warranted. It is very rare and unlikely to achieve anything difficult and significant by adopting a "wait and see" attitude! Can't you see why this is wrong?
Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
^^^^^^^^^ Agree!
APA came out & demanded a 50% pay raise. How has that worked for them?

You guys honestly believe that we can just negotiate whatever pay rates we want regardless of our peers rates?
johnso29 is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:06 AM
  #3499  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29

You guys honestly believe that we can just negotiate whatever pay rates we want regardless of our peers rates?
WN did. CAL/UAL are doing it right now.

Last edited by Columbia; 12-10-2010 at 08:43 AM.
Columbia is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:08 AM
  #3500  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
So you aren't doing this with DPA? DPA has zero track record, no ties in D.C., & nothing more then a crystal ball prediction.
I'm not doing anything with DPA at this point (other than I sent in a card because I think the debate/vote is worth having) as they do not represent me yet. What I do know is that I would rather go with a somewhat unknown quantity that advocates restoration and believes it is possible, than to stick with a known quantity with a track record of making every excuse in the book why it can't happen and that advocates tying our compensation to the ups and downs of the economy and our industry. If you look at the track record of this industry, we are unlikely to ever make any significant progress by tying our compensation to this industry's profits. To base our strategy on that is very likely to be a failure from the start.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices