Delta Pilots Association
#3061
Make each pilot group pick at the pie with shorter duration contracts to stair step our way back to where we should be. Not trying to hit Grand Slams with the wind in our faces. It will end up with us at the same location in the same time, but with more agreement more frequently.
Carl
#3062
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 45
Long time lurker, first time poster.
I want to restore payrates, workrules, and retirement. How much is it going to cost to bring the RJs in house? If we do bring them in house, what is going to stop management from making all domestic flying "RJs"?
Sorry, but let's leave the RJs alone and restore our pay. I'm not interested in flying an RJ for RJ wages.
I want to restore payrates, workrules, and retirement. How much is it going to cost to bring the RJs in house? If we do bring them in house, what is going to stop management from making all domestic flying "RJs"?
Sorry, but let's leave the RJs alone and restore our pay. I'm not interested in flying an RJ for RJ wages.
#3063
Long time lurker, first time poster.
I want to restore payrates, workrules, and retirement. How much is it going to cost to bring the RJs in house? If we do bring them in house, what is going to stop management from making all domestic flying "RJs"?
Sorry, but let's leave the RJs alone and restore our pay. I'm not interested in flying an RJ for RJ wages.
I want to restore payrates, workrules, and retirement. How much is it going to cost to bring the RJs in house? If we do bring them in house, what is going to stop management from making all domestic flying "RJs"?
Sorry, but let's leave the RJs alone and restore our pay. I'm not interested in flying an RJ for RJ wages.
I think UAL/CAL have it right for the near term. They want everything over 50 seats in house...period. The regional carriers continue to fly the 50 seaters, and mainline flies anything larger.
I'm not interested in flying RJ's for RJ wages either. But if you pay me -400 pay to fly RJ's, I'll fly your RJ anywhere. I hope you get my point. Over 50 seat RJ's need to be paid at mainline rates, and most importantly, that flying done in house. Outsourcing is the slippery slope to hell, and we're getting too close as it is.
Carl
#3064
Long time lurker, first time poster.
I want to restore payrates, workrules, and retirement. How much is it going to cost to bring the RJs in house? If we do bring them in house, what is going to stop management from making all domestic flying "RJs"?
Sorry, but let's leave the RJs alone and restore our pay. I'm not interested in flying an RJ for RJ wages.
I want to restore payrates, workrules, and retirement. How much is it going to cost to bring the RJs in house? If we do bring them in house, what is going to stop management from making all domestic flying "RJs"?
Sorry, but let's leave the RJs alone and restore our pay. I'm not interested in flying an RJ for RJ wages.
This is something that needs to be looked at. I beleive that if we can get an agreement to not extend, amend, renew, or draft new DCI agreements, and let the current ones expire, the scope argument in the small jet arena will come a long way. DAL still has over 15 billion in commitment to its DCI partners, and frankly no one wants to play that costing game.
Furthermore, these "jets" that are flying for DCI may be flying past 2020, but my hunch is they will not be. The CASM/RASM ratio on those jets is quickly slipping. There will always be a need for some of them, but maybe not these jets. It is why with scope recapture you must get the seat segment and or the weight limits, not a specific jet.
Carl;
You will not have to fly those jets for "RJ" wages, but a RJ guy would love to fly those jets for whatever they pay because they have a DAL seniority number that gives them a direct path to your seat, not a 10 year career at a regional followed by a longevity reset.
With the current CBA's and PWA's staggered the way they are, AMR's Arpy is not going to agree to anything for the APA pilots until he sees what CAL does, and if he can DAL. His costs are much higher than his competitors and he will not price himself out of the market.
If we and or UCAL get pay raises that go above AMR's by a bunch then Arpy will try to match or exceed those by the traditional margin, but he has already said that he wants to wait for the rest to catch up. Sucky Sucky but the NMB seems to agree with parking them.
Carl;
It would be great for them to succeed. I would love to see them with a 63% raise tomorrow, but because of what I have said above, Arpy has been given the green light to sit on his hands.
#3065
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
Bad plan. AMR is not picking at the pie, they are demanding restoration. UAL/CAL is most likely going to be shooting for UAL restoration. That leaves us. Do we really just want to "pick at the pie" if all the others shoot for restoration? And if one of them doesn't, does that mean that we shouldn't? What is it about Delta Air Lines that makes us less worthy to shoot for restoration? We're the largest airline. We're industry leaders. Let's lead.
Carl
Carl
Again, How about a plan? The reason is simple. There is no plan under the RLA that can deliver in one bump a restoration contract. There is also no way Delta could survive such a contract in its current form as I pointed out in another post. The fallout from the other employees would destroy the airline without even discussing what happens every single time to airlines with a large cost disadvantage. You have to drag the other airlines with you.
P.S. APA has fired the restoration crowd. They are putting all new people in to try and get a contract down in the next year. I suspect you will see a agreement. It wont be anything close to restoration but hopefully it will be a step in the right direction.
#3066
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
acl,
There are two points sailing is trying to make. One is distasteful to me, but can be discussed. The other is reprehensible and totally irritating to me.
Sailing's point #1:
We can ask for smaller increases and shorter contracts to achieve restoration, little by little.
Sailing's point #2:
If we did get full restoration we would all die a slow painful death by the hands of unwilling aircraft finance company's; jealous flight attendants, mechanics, rampers, and everyone else associated with Delta; and their jealousy would transfer over to the passengers who would kill us also. But at least we would all be furloughed and Delta would be bankrupted long before Armageddon.
That, my friend, is a total scare tactic, which for me doesn't carry much weight.
There are two points sailing is trying to make. One is distasteful to me, but can be discussed. The other is reprehensible and totally irritating to me.
Sailing's point #1:
We can ask for smaller increases and shorter contracts to achieve restoration, little by little.
Sailing's point #2:
If we did get full restoration we would all die a slow painful death by the hands of unwilling aircraft finance company's; jealous flight attendants, mechanics, rampers, and everyone else associated with Delta; and their jealousy would transfer over to the passengers who would kill us also. But at least we would all be furloughed and Delta would be bankrupted long before Armageddon.
That, my friend, is a total scare tactic, which for me doesn't carry much weight.
I want restoration. I think it takes two bites to get there. My plan is get the first bite now and the second bite in 3 to 4 years. Your plan appears to be to threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. In 2016 or 17 and still working under this contract you will finally exhale just like APA and end up getting what we could have had now. Show me a path to get to a restoration contract now and I will follow you with 100 percent support.
#3067
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
CARL'S PLAN:
MEC Chairman flanked by negotiating committe films a web video stating the following:
1. C2K contract restoration is the number one priority in this Section 6 opener. Absolutely nothing less will be accepted.
2. Outsourcing of flying done under the Delta banner must begin to be undone. No more outsourcing contracts of any kind can be signed by management, and the existing ones cannot be extended. No exceptions.
3. All out efforts will be used at all levels of ALPA national and DALPA to put limits on the time that NMB can refuse to allow an impasse to be declared. If ever there was an issue where all our political clout must be used, this is it.
4. All pilots should begin an austerity plan today. Save up at least one year's worth of living expenses in case a strike is the only answer at the end of Section 6 negotiations.
5. Fight like hell right this second to begin this process.
And I'm just a humble greenskeeper.
Carl
MEC Chairman flanked by negotiating committe films a web video stating the following:
1. C2K contract restoration is the number one priority in this Section 6 opener. Absolutely nothing less will be accepted.
2. Outsourcing of flying done under the Delta banner must begin to be undone. No more outsourcing contracts of any kind can be signed by management, and the existing ones cannot be extended. No exceptions.
3. All out efforts will be used at all levels of ALPA national and DALPA to put limits on the time that NMB can refuse to allow an impasse to be declared. If ever there was an issue where all our political clout must be used, this is it.
4. All pilots should begin an austerity plan today. Save up at least one year's worth of living expenses in case a strike is the only answer at the end of Section 6 negotiations.
5. Fight like hell right this second to begin this process.
And I'm just a humble greenskeeper.
Carl
Carl, with the exception of item 3 your not giving a plan. You are giving demands. Item 3 has and is being pursued. One step in that direction was to attempt remove Fedex from the RLA. I am sure you saw how that turned out with a labor friendly Congress and NMB.
The rest of your plan would go like this. Delta, Thanks for your opener. We will get back to you in June. DALPA, JUNE!! Thats 6 months away we need to get meeting going now!. Delta, You misunderstood. We meant June of 2014. DALPA, Hey NMB Delta is being unreasonable and wont talk to us! NMB. We don't think so good day!
#3068
Sailing;
I agree. We all want restoration. I also agree it takes two bites to get there. We need APA and UCALALPA to get their bites before it is our dinner time. It makes our job that much easier.
Yes, APA fired the Restoration or bust crowd and put a pragmatic (Lee like ) leader in there that understands the financial side of his company, his pilots wants, and is going to find the best way to think outside of the box, and get his pilots what they want as quickly as he can. His take is to get a nice bite, let the other pilot groups go next, and then come back and get the second bite.
You guys notice that after five years of nada, one of this guys first steps was to get ALPA services?
I agree. We all want restoration. I also agree it takes two bites to get there. We need APA and UCALALPA to get their bites before it is our dinner time. It makes our job that much easier.
Yes, APA fired the Restoration or bust crowd and put a pragmatic (Lee like ) leader in there that understands the financial side of his company, his pilots wants, and is going to find the best way to think outside of the box, and get his pilots what they want as quickly as he can. His take is to get a nice bite, let the other pilot groups go next, and then come back and get the second bite.
You guys notice that after five years of nada, one of this guys first steps was to get ALPA services?
#3069
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
See NewK's plan. It's simple... doesn't have all the detail filled in. But neither does yours. The difference is that NewK's plan actually defines our objective and aims to achieve it. DALPA's objective is clear as mud and, from all indications, is something considerably short of restoration.
#3070
And again and again? Your plan?
I want restoration. I think it takes two bites to get there. My plan is get the first bite now and the second bite in 3 to 4 years. Your plan appears to be to threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. In 2016 or 17 and still working under this contract you will finally exhale just like APA and end up getting what we could have had now. Show me a path to get to a restoration contract now and I will follow you with 100 percent support.
I want restoration. I think it takes two bites to get there. My plan is get the first bite now and the second bite in 3 to 4 years. Your plan appears to be to threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. In 2016 or 17 and still working under this contract you will finally exhale just like APA and end up getting what we could have had now. Show me a path to get to a restoration contract now and I will follow you with 100 percent support.
Comm on now. At this point, this has got to be comical to even you. You really can't see it? All I can do is picture you as Tatoo, from Fantasy Island, running around asking us for, "The Plan? The plan? The plan...."
Look for my post with the BIG picture of the bird with his head on the ground, hiding in fear. Read all of my posts on the subject.
"The Plan" is not complicated. It's not going to contain a lot of numbers. It's not going to have a lot of charts or graphs. It only involves doing what is human nature.
The Plan?
Ask for what we want. See what they say.
The chicks like a guy who can at least ask for what he wants.
Now, I've got to go take the some family to the airport, but I'll be back with a better response in a bit....
New K Now
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM