Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2010, 05:02 PM
  #2981  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Are you aware that the court ruled that the workers would have their wages garnished for years to pay off a huge fine for their illegal work action? Pretty much killed any benefits gained by the strike in the first place.
It did not kill the benefits they gained during the strike. And that was not the point anyway. The point was that union leaders and unified memberships can do extraordinary things...if they want to. ALPA hasn't acted like a union for a VERY long time.

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Revenue is largely irrelevant. The company isn't turning a profit. They can't pay billions more each year when they can't even turn a profit on the current cost structure.
What an unbelievably silly statement. Revenue is the most important part of ANY business. Management teams can use totally legal accounting schemes to show costs such that they're not turning a profit. We've seen that for decades. It's harder for companies to hide revenue. AMR has no case for their intransigence. They're only able to be this stubborn due to the NMB acting as their union busting agent.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 05:04 PM
  #2982  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I guess the pushback by ALPA, not management but ALPA, on pay and scope and change just pushes pilots to want the whipping stick of the DPA, to actually get the DPA or just outright disengage from supporting or volunteering from ALPA.*
Again, you are correct sir.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 07:49 PM
  #2983  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 460
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
It did not kill the benefits they gained during the strike. And that was not the point anyway. The point was that union leaders and unified memberships can do extraordinary things...if they want to. ALPA hasn't acted like a union for a VERY long time.
You shouldn't do "extraordinary things" just for the sake of doing them. They should be a means to reach a goal. In the context of the TWU strike, their illegal actions didn't result in any meaningful improvements. In the end, a union leader was put in jail, the union was hit with a huge fine, the workers themselves had money garnished from their wages to pay off Taylor Law fines, and they really got nothing for it. Their leadership tried to save face by claiming that the strike prevented concessions to their pension, but in reality, state law didn't even require the TWU to bargain over pension issues, so the pension was never in danger in the first place. The whole thing was a waste. It shouldn't be used by anyone as an example for effective union work.

What an unbelievably silly statement. Revenue is the most important part of ANY business. Management teams can use totally legal accounting schemes to show costs such that they're not turning a profit. We've seen that for decades. It's harder for companies to hide revenue. AMR has no case for their intransigence. They're only able to be this stubborn due to the NMB acting as their union busting agent.
Ahh, so you believe management is "hiding money." Where exactly is this billions of dollars being hidden, exactly? And if it is, why are the shareholders not stringing up the BOD for depriving them of share price improvements that would certainly follow an announcement of these profits that you claim are being hidden?

Ridiculous. There is no hidden money, Carl. Profits can be manipulated slightly in the short term by using accounting tricks such as structuring ammortizations in creative ways, and managements sometimes do that to avoid profit sharing payments at a certain time, but it's only temporary, because the profits show up soon enough. They don't get hidden, they just get delayed. You could also argue that management is reducing profits by buying back stock or making large capital expenditures for growth or improvements, but none of that is true in the case of AMR.

Look, I would love it if it was possible for the APA to get full restoration, but it just isn't in the cards at this point. AMR just doesn't have the money. Improvements are certainly expected, but they won't get pre-concessionary rates on date of signing.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 07:52 PM
  #2984  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,325
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Personally, I think we would gain much more if we could alter the environment in a way that makes pilot costs a constant across the industry. When I dream, I see a future where ALPA would simply be an exclusive crew-leasing company to the airlines, and pilots would be no more tied to a carrier than a plumber to your personal sink. I also see much to be gained by controlling the supply of pilots by maintaining higher barriers to entry (i.e. advocating for higher and higher certification requirements, etc.).
This I agree with. Basically put all pilots into a guild.
capncrunch is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 08:06 PM
  #2985  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Look, I would love it if it was possible for the APA to get full restoration, but it just isn't in the cards at this point. AMR just doesn't have the money. Improvements are certainly expected, but they won't get pre-concessionary rates on date of signing.
Well they weren't asking for full restoration to their pre-concessionary rates. If I remember correctly, they were asking to restore the rates to 1992 buying power (for those of you in Rio Linda/Herndon, that's 18 years ago), which would result in an increase in CASM to AA of less than 1/2 cent.

If we aren't willing to set anything at least that good as our objective, then we might as well just throw in the towel and write off this profession. With what I'm hearing from ALPA, I'm getting real close to being ready to throw the towel in on them before it's too late. C2012 is too important. I don't want someone representing me who has already given up.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 08:12 PM
  #2986  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Ahh, so you believe management is "hiding money." Where exactly is this billions of dollars being hidden, exactly?
If you're not going to even read what I write, then you should probably just go away. If you actually cared to read what I write, you would see that I never said management hides money. That's your attempt to change the subject from your patently ignorant statement that "revenue is largely irrelevant." What I did say is that it is very easy for corporations to use perfectly legal accounting rules to show a loss even in the face of strong revenue. What is much harder to do is hide revenue. Revenue is THE key metric for any business. That's why your statement that "revenue is largely irrelevant" is so ignorant. Spoken by a person who knows nothing about running a business.

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Ridiculous. There is no hidden money, Carl.
Again, if you thought before you posted, you would know that you are the only one talking about hidden money.

Originally Posted by PCL_128
Look, I would love it if it was possible for the APA to get full restoration, but it just isn't in the cards at this point. AMR just doesn't have the money. Improvements are certainly expected, but they won't get pre-concessionary rates on date of signing.
You know nothing of AMR or APA's current condition. You have no idea what is, or is not in the cards for APA or AMR. If we are even to believe you are who you infer, you're just a pilot who thinks he's plugged in now that you have a job at ALPA national. Take a business class or two while you're there not working.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 08:14 PM
  #2987  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Well they weren't asking for full restoration to their pre-concessionary rates. If I remember correctly, they were asking to restore the rates to 1992 buying power (for those of you in Rio Linda/Herndon, that's 18 years ago), which would result in an increase in CASM to AA of less than 1/2 cent.

If we aren't willing to set anything at least that good as our objective, then we might as well just throw in the towel and write off this profession. With what I'm hearing from ALPA, I'm getting real close to being ready to throw the towel in on them before it's too late. C2012 is too important. I don't want someone representing me who has already given up.
That sums it up in a nutshell.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 10:21 PM
  #2988  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 460
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You know nothing of AMR or APA's current condition. You have no idea what is, or is not in the cards for APA or AMR.
Check back with me when the APA actually gets a contract, Carl. We'll see who's right.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 11:20 PM
  #2989  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Still no answer to my question from a few pages back?

Restated in a different fashion: If you are not willing to ask for what you want, what are you willing to ask for? Why?

In my book, if you accept the premise of the question, you have a problem if you can't answer it BUT you still most likely have a problem even if you can answer it.

I'm still waiting for any real answer. What's your plan?


Happy Thanksgiving.
newKnow is offline  
Old 11-25-2010, 06:11 AM
  #2990  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Really? You're really going to use a chart showing inflation adjusted rates in a discussion about whether our pay increases over the decades represent a boom/bust cycle?
Fair enough - but see below.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The facts are that since 1978, pilot pay rates have seen nice steady increases with an occasional step down, followed by steady increases. Until the world changing events of 9/11. That is NOT a boom/bust cycle.
I can only speak for DAL. I was hired in the late 80's and the early 90s contract had modest raises. By today's standard, that's a boom. Then the 1996 contract had a 2% paycut, followed with a 4-year, no raise, contract. That a bust by my definition. Then the 2001 contract had about a 30% raise. That's a boom by my definition. Then our pre-bankruptcy and bankruptcy contracts had a combined 42% paycut, and a pension termination. That's a bust by my definition. And I'll call the JCBA a wash.

So, in my 20 years, five contracts have been boom-bust-boom-bust-wash. Pretty much just what slow was claiming to be true. I can't speak for how those twenty years played out at NWA.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
When I was a newbie in the late 70's, I recall my airline's 747 captain pay had just cracked the incredible $100 per hour figure, and it was near the best in the industry. ALPA and its pilots have a lot to be proud of for maintaining the steady upward trend for all these decades up to 9/11. The characterization of boom/bust is simply wrong. And to use an inflation adjusted chart to make your case about pay rates is disingenuous at best.

Carl
DAL88, where are you? Carl states that modest increases, which were in reality modest decreases when adjusted for inflation, are something to be proud of. Eerily similar to LM claiming that we are now back to pre-bankruptcy pay rates, don't you think? Hmmm. Could it be??? Is Carl really a pseudonym for our very own LM? Things that make you go Hmmm.

Last edited by Pineapple Guy; 11-25-2010 at 06:30 AM.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices