Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2010, 11:52 AM
  #281  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
If DALPA was so concerned about a proliferation of "large small jets", why wasn't Compass merged into Delta, setting a precedent for recapturing at least some of the small-jet flying?
Management controls mergers and acquisitions, not the pilots. If Compass had been kept under mainline ALPA, its goals would have been a conflict of interest with DALPA. (regional vs mainline) Plus it is likely Moak knew they were going to be sold at some point down the road.

From what I have seen, ALPA will do whatever it takes to avoid a regional - mainline merger scenario. America West/US Airways is the reason why. ALPA would be immediately wiped off the property.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 11:54 AM
  #282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
upndsky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Bebe Bus De L'Air Assistant Aerial Conveyance Facilitator
Posts: 351
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
This is where I disagree. If you ask 100 RJ pilots, 99 will say that they hope that RJ's shrink and mainline grows. Look at their contracts, their jobs really are much worse than ours, they all want to go to mainline.

Focusing on RJ growth right now is akin to focusing on the Soviet menace invading western Europe. It's over. Industry consolidation is here. After CAL/UAL get together then AMR will have to make some move. They will all face the same phenomenon as what happened at Delta. A larger carrier will need larger jets. In case you haven't noticed, RJ's are falling away like flies. They are undergoing massive consolidation now, (probably forced by their parent carriers) because the ones that don't consolidate will die. Comair is shrinking by half and we are hiring. Delta's RJ capacity shrunk 4.4% last quarter and will probably be more than that this quarter.

So if you want to change unions because of the RJ menace, you need to invent a time machine and go back to the 1990's because you are 20 years too late. That problem is over. If you have other reasons to get a new union then discuss that. The dual agenda at National never existed except in webboard warriors minds and even if it did, perestroika has come.
And this is where I disagree. Stagnation in the past decade has forced many at the regionals to become lifers. I came from the regionals and I know many who have been there 10+ years who have resigned themselves to finishing their careers there.

The threat isn't 50-seaters. It's the regional lifers who now want to maximize the size of the aircraft they fly and therefore their paycheck, even if it means at the expense of mainline. And the percentage that want that is greater than 1%, as you seem to imply. Ask the top third at any large regional like Skywest, ASA, ExpressJet, Republic, etc and you will find many who have no intention or hope of moving on and are willing to fight for everything they can get. And since they pay more in dues than a regional newhire trying to build time, their voices will be heard.
upndsky is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 11:58 AM
  #283  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

This thread is going to drift off into speculative nonsense and irrelevancy if someone doesn't step up and speak on behalf of DPA. I don't know if it will be one of the 3 named officers or someone else, but it better be soon.

If that website is all they got, it will be a darn shame.

Tim? Frank? Ira?

Last edited by Check Essential; 09-21-2010 at 12:13 PM.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 12:08 PM
  #284  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,619
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Management controls mergers and acquisitions, not the pilots.
I understand that...but it doesn't change the fact that Compass was the *best* opportunity Delta pilots had to recapture the large small jet flying that apparently is the biggest threat to their careers.

And they seemingly walked away from it without a second thought.

If Compass had been kept under mainline ALPA, its goals would have been a conflict of interest with DALPA. (regional vs mainline) Plus it is likely Moak knew they were going to be sold at some point down the road.
If Compass had been kept under mainline ALPA, wouldn't it have strengthened DALPA's their case for accreting that flying? Sure, DALPA would have had to take the Compass pilots too (which apparently will happen anyway) but I imagine a staple along with some sort of fence could have been negotiated.

I'll be the first to admit I don't know the ins & outs of Compass/Delta/NWA and certainly don't know the internal politics...but at least for a while, Compass was owned by Delta and their pilots represented by DALPA (unlike Comair & Mesaba)...I'm not sure the process going forward will be any less complicated than that.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 12:21 PM
  #285  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP

If Compass had been kept under mainline ALPA, wouldn't it have strengthened DALPA's their case for accreting that flying? Sure, DALPA would have had to take the Compass pilots too (which apparently will happen anyway) but I imagine a staple along with some sort of fence could have been negotiated.

I'll be the first to admit I don't know the ins & outs of Compass/Delta/NWA and certainly don't know the internal politics...but at least for a while, Compass was owned by Delta and their pilots represented by DALPA (unlike Comair & Mesaba)...I'm not sure the process going forward will be any less complicated than that.
If Compass & Delta had merged then one NC would be representing both merging pilot groups. This would be a problem, as there were pilots who had been at Compass longer then some pilots had been at NWA/DAL. Do you see the conflict of interest now? How would protect the interests of each group when you represent both of them? Do you recall the whole RJDC mess? Comair guys wanting DOH? Lawsuits coming about?
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 12:24 PM
  #286  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
Are you implying that if we form our own union, management will fire all the pilots and hire new ones? Or that ALPA is the only game in town and we must deal with it?

Very ridiculous.
He's absolutely implying that there is no better way than ALPA.
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 12:26 PM
  #287  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by 1234
I am all for the discussion and really welcome some change, I just need something that I can get behind and support and not just empty promises
You mean like the oh-so-fulfilling promises we get from the latest bunch in Herndon?
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 12:33 PM
  #288  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by 1234
If we are unified, why can't we make the required changes to national alpa? Don't you think that the regular line pilots at the other airlines that make up alpa aren't just as frustrated?
Yes they are, but there is way too much insulation and bureaucracy for the proletariat to get thru. Just TRY to put through some sort of resolution at a meeting sometime... make sure it one that most of the pilots can get behind.. and watch it die right there in front of your eyes... if not there, it will be beheaded in some comittee before it ever gets to national. I'll help ya start.

BE IT RESOLVED: Since ALPA represents a large contingent of airlines, and whereas the vast majority of those airlines make far less than the legacy airlines, in order for the ALPA MEC to be in touch with his constituency, that his pay reflect the pay of the captains in ALL of those airlines, not just the three highest ones... AND that that pay now be based on an average of the highest paying captain at all member airlines under the ALPA stewardship.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that his retirement hereby be null and void as is the majority of his constituency

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that since NO commuter receives a housing allowance in the city to which he must commute, that that allowance hereby be revoked indefinitely.

Sorry for the run on... but this kind of "take it back" campaign won't even see the light of day in Herndon. Guaranteed
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 12:36 PM
  #289  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
To me, if the guys behind DPA want to form another union then do it for the right reasons and do what is right for Delta pilots and don't presume to be in charge. Allow the group to chose who they want if so inclined.

What was it Lincoln said: nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power.

Which is my issue with elections, if I can't truly trust the people I elect (speaking of congress), how in the world can I trust people who I don't elect and are not held accountable? Speaking of dopey.
THIS^^^ Nicely said sir.
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 12:38 PM
  #290  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I understand that...but it doesn't change the fact that Compass was the *best* opportunity Delta pilots had to recapture the large small jet flying that apparently is the biggest threat to their careers.

And they seemingly walked away from it without a second thought.



If Compass had been kept under mainline ALPA, wouldn't it have strengthened DALPA's their case for accreting that flying? Sure, DALPA would have had to take the Compass pilots too (which apparently will happen anyway) but I imagine a staple along with some sort of fence could have been negotiated.

I'll be the first to admit I don't know the ins & outs of Compass/Delta/NWA and certainly don't know the internal politics...but at least for a while, Compass was owned by Delta and their pilots represented by DALPA (unlike Comair & Mesaba)...I'm not sure the process going forward will be any less complicated than that.
Simply put, DALPA can't put compass pilots on its list. This is because the JCBA allows for Compass to operate. It is up to management whether or not they want to merge the two together. Having compass represented by the mainline MEC is completely independent of scope recapture during section 6 negotiations.

The problem with scope recapture is how management wants to approach it. In the 2012 contract DALPA could theoretically make section 1 one sentence: "All Delta Flying will be done by Delta seniority list pilots under the provisions of this CBA". It is now up to management to comply with that provision, this is where things could get ugly. Management can then say that they will have to merge with skywest/ASA, comair, compass, etc. Since they don't have the cash to buy out the contracts of these companies and operate the jets at mainline. Then you face the SLI of all the regionals with the mainline. This is the situation ALPA will do whatever it takes to avoid.
Mesabah is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices