Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2010, 09:54 AM
  #2771  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So SWAPA or ALPA, I wonder what the real SWA pilots would pick?


The same one the real AirTran pilots will pick ...... SWAPA.

Would you like to see a substantive example of PCL128 and his lawyers recent work ? Take a close look at the AirTran TA and the process leading up to it. The rest is rhetoric.

AirTran pilots have seen what ALPA produces; "Vote for it because we can't do any better, and we won't get another chance".
RCD73 is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 10:29 AM
  #2772  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by rcd73
the same one the real airtran pilots will pick ...... Swapa.

Would you like to see a substantive example of pcl128 and his lawyers recent work ? Take a close look at the airtran ta and the process leading up to it. The rest is rhetoric.

Airtran pilots have seen what alpa produces; "vote for it because we can't do any better, and we won't get another chance".
It'd be interesting if there was a vote of the combined groups.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 10:51 AM
  #2773  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Your numbers are right in line with what I expect on the next contract. Someone did a fairly detailed calculation on restoration on the other forum. His number needed for a full restoration was about a 65 percent raise. In addition going back to all the old work rules ect.. would require another 3000 pilots on the list. We went from a 600 average block hour per pilot to 800 hours with the 1113 contract.

This one?

Here is the Inflation YOY since 2004:
Historical Inflation data from 1914 to the present

Put the link so you can verify the source

2004: 2.68
2005: 3.39
2006: 3.24
2007: 2.85
2008: 3.85
2009: -0.34

For a grand total of 15.67% total inflation since the start of 2004. (liner non compounding math used.) Compounding annually equals about 16.61%

So what you are asking for on Jan 1, 2013 is this:
Lets use 2012 777/744A pay and compare it to 2004 C2K 777 pay of 319 an hr

319-225= 94 dollars per hr up front plus a 15.67% increase on the 319 figure to equal 368.99 per hr from our book of 225, or a 64% increase, correct? (or 65%)

Math 319-225= 94 bump plus inflation=
319x 1.1567=368.99 per hr (or the other way 371.99 per hr)
368.99-225.00= 143.99 per hr immediate increase. (371.99-225= 146.99)

Lets just extrapolate that out a little as well. 5% last year was equal to 90 million. 4% next year is equal to 75 million. Without computing the non-linear data for the next two pay bumps that would equate to a 18-18.75 million dollar per percent increase in the total value of the PWA without costing out more retirement and or work rule improvements.

We on the same page?

We will use 18 million for a uber conservative estimate on pay costs alone.
18 x 64= 1.152 billion dollar increase to the PWA for hourly rates alone (or 18 x 65= 1.170 billion)
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 01:52 PM
  #2774  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,325
Default

.................................................. ...
capncrunch is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 01:55 PM
  #2775  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,325
Default

Originally Posted by vprMatrix
If it is 2004 rates and contract adjusted for inflation than I agree that it is not going to happen.

-vpr
Just curious, why?
capncrunch is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 02:26 PM
  #2776  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
Just curious, why?
Because we have no leverage for it. We'd be making so much more then everyone else management would most likely laugh while rolling on the floor all the way out the door.

I would love restoration, but we can get a lot closer with work rules & pay rates, rather then just pay rates. JMO.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 02:30 PM
  #2777  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Johnso;
Work rules are key. a min day not a Duty Period Average should be first and foremost.

Also, I cannot even say that the almighty "restoration" is not possible. Why? Because we still need to see if UCAL and AMR raise the bar at all. If they are still at the table then we are going to have a very difficult time getting anything.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 03:44 PM
  #2778  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Johnso;
Work rules are key. a min day not a Duty Period Average should be first and foremost.

Also, I cannot even say that the almighty "restoration" is not possible. Why? Because we still need to see if UCAL and AMR raise the bar at all. If they are still at the table then we are going to have a very difficult time getting anything.
Really? Anything?! Man, I sure hope your mentality is not representative of our reps and especially our negotiator's mentality! After all that we lost, it is just beyond sickening to think that a single one of us would suggest something like that. I sure hope I misunderstood what you were saying.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 04:07 PM
  #2779  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

DAL88;
It depends on what we ask for. With our overall compensation package already close to the top, we would get some improvements quick, but the rest would have to take a unified group. Having these two carriers restore some of their work rules and pay would go a long way to getting us to an acceptable floor to start from. Also, I did not say "impossible", I said "difficult;" big difference. As I have said, if we get behind our union anything is possible with a little unity and elbow grease!!!!

I think you would be very surprised to know what my minimum pay and total contractual raise is. Of course I am not going to publish that tidbit of info, but it is a long way from managing your expectations downward.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 04:45 PM
  #2780  
Gets Weekends Off
 
vprMatrix's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 243
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
Just curious, why?
I think johnso summed it up. Getting back to 2004 pay rates would put Delta squarely at the top of pay rates. To go far above that would not be wise.

Just my opinion.
vprMatrix is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices