Delta Pilots Association
#2091
There are lots of reasons Delta pilots should care what happens to ALPA, whether the pilots of Delta stay or leave. First off, the loss of Delta would be a blow to ALPA, no doubt. The influence to direct policy and provide guidance would be sorely missed. That said, the pilots of Delta, represented by another union will not, have any where near the influence ALPA does now, with or without DAL. The near term issues of a newly formed union will be so daunting, it will be could up in administrative BS along with recruitment for a considerable time, that it will be a long time before you will be able to attempt to influence any policy on Capital Hill.
As I've said to you before, you probably shouldn't get too worked up about what we're doing here at Delta. We'll either change who represents us, or we won't. Either way, we'll wish you FedEx guys the best.
Carl
#2092
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 593
Now that's too funny. Thanks for the good laugh.
#2093
Also Carl, a long time ago when I did no volunteer work, and did not engage my reps, I too thought that a independent union may be the way to go, but after engaging my reps, and learning the back history and facts about many issues, I realize that even though there are issues to fix within the organization, ALPA is bar none the way to go.
Ask any pilot who has ALPA step up to the plate to defend them and they will tel you that it is they who they want behind them.
Ask any pilot who has ALPA step up to the plate to defend them and they will tel you that it is they who they want behind them.
I've done all that you've done and more over 3 decades with ALPA and have come to just the opposite conclusion. Many, many other pilots have as well. That is why you and the other apologists are so panic stricken over this. I understand.
I still find it so interesting that ALPA still hasn't come out with a statement welcoming the competition. Only the slander and massive fear mongering that you've championed thus far.
Carl
#2094
I'm not trying to ID you. Your ID is not the issue. Your exposure to ALPA's communications "scripture" is the issue.
What did you think of ALPA's communications "scripture" during the Northwest strike in 1998 and the Comair strike in 2001?
And thank you for calling my posts "stunning"!
What did you think of ALPA's communications "scripture" during the Northwest strike in 1998 and the Comair strike in 2001?
And thank you for calling my posts "stunning"!
Carl
#2095
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 593
Typical deflection and straw man arguments. The point is that Hawaiin showed the example of turning down the first TA in bankruptcy. The result was a second TA that was far better than the rejected one. DALPA did not reject their first TA, neither did NWALPA. Hawaiin showed the example. That's the point.
Continue on with your next deflection, straw man argument, and/or threats via PM.
Carl
Continue on with your next deflection, straw man argument, and/or threats via PM.
Carl
Maybe, just maybe, the situations were different.
#2096
Carl
#2097
#2098
You have no integrity from which to compare. You tried to silence a poster by threatening him via PM.
As you well know, only you can post whatever portion of a PM you want. Moderators or the recipient have no recourse. You lied about what you've posted here. None of us can ever have access to your PM. You'll understand if we don't trust you.
Carl
Carl
#2099
Yes, we'll see how successful they are at that.
Actually, it's fact based on a thorough analysis of the contracts and flight schedules at all ALPA carriers. ALPA has done a very thorough analysis several times. But don't let facts get in the way of a good forum diatribe!
Really? Please state your experience working personally with the law firm. Oh, you don't have any? I'm shocked.
Nope. Experience. I've lived with CAPA when we had an independent union. How much experience have you had in dealing with them?
Really? Please state your experience in elected office and please inform everyone of the "assimilation" process. We're all ears.
Sorry, but that's just not true. The APA signed a services agreement in which ALPA will provide services to the APA in exchange for money. The APA will not be providing ALPA assistance with anything.
Actually, it's fact based on a thorough analysis of the contracts and flight schedules at all ALPA carriers. ALPA has done a very thorough analysis several times. But don't let facts get in the way of a good forum diatribe!
Really? Please state your experience working personally with the law firm. Oh, you don't have any? I'm shocked.
Nope. Experience. I've lived with CAPA when we had an independent union. How much experience have you had in dealing with them?
Really? Please state your experience in elected office and please inform everyone of the "assimilation" process. We're all ears.
Sorry, but that's just not true. The APA signed a services agreement in which ALPA will provide services to the APA in exchange for money. The APA will not be providing ALPA assistance with anything.
Carl
#2100
As much as you and other apologists want to ignore this, it is a fact. Hawaiin pilots showed that it could be successfully done. We didn't.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM