Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2010, 05:50 AM
  #1481  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Yes they can it is part of the ALPA By-Laws. The MEC has to approve it though.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 07:10 AM
  #1482  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: No to large RJs
Posts: 369
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Well, Carl, your post said "coast to coast" turns. Now I know DTW is on the shore of Lake St. Clair, but that is not what people think of as coast to coast. Look, if you ever come back to a domestic aircraft you would not have to worry about doing day turns from DTW to SFO/LAX/SEA/PDX, etc. They wouldn't make it past the top 10% of the category list.

So you admit that you have no scientific data to back up your rantings and your personal attacks are nothing more than a cover for your lack of knowledge. At least we now know where you are coming from. Pretty much standard Carl.
I think Carl has a valid point. You say JFK-LAX to support your argument, when that is in the minority since it goes over 10 hours. The majority of east-west trips could be done as a turn with the new NPRM and you know these are the trips Carl is referring too. You are right in the fact that the top 10 percent would do these trips. Look no further than our FAs. Who is more succeptable to the effects of a 10 hour flight day...the old pilots who will be bidding them. But wait, wasn't this all about improving safety?

Where is your scientific evidence that flying 10 flight hours extendable to a 15 hour duty day is more safe than flying 8 in 15 or say 8 in 16 for whitlow? This is nothing more than a horse trade and our union is smack right in the middle of it. ALPA is part of the problem.
DAWGS is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 07:11 AM
  #1483  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingViking
Sorry, ALPA used that money to cover Praters car expenses.

While I'm at it; happy to see Carl and ACL agree, I knew it all along that both those guys had knowledge and good intentions....
Carl is correct. It had been a few years since I read the by-laws and policy manual. Since then I have talked to the current and former reps and all of them laughed at the question of them selling scope without a MEMRAT vote. Even if it is up to the MEC Council Members, there is not way they are going to approve LOA like this and not send it to MEMRAT.

I recall talking to a few reps that said if pay, scope, or working conditions were greatly altered that it would go to MEMRAT.

As for MEMRAT of LOA's, we can get that, but we would probably have about 20% of the group vote on them. It is a great idea, but first the pilot group as a whole needs to be willing to vote on em. Heck most people do not know that Military Charters can be assigned to reserves now.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 07:39 AM
  #1484  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by DAWGS
I think Carl has a valid point. You say JFK-LAX to support your argument, when that is in the minority since it goes over 10 hours. The majority of east-west trips could be done as a turn with the new NPRM and you know these are the trips Carl is referring too. You are right in the fact that the top 10 percent would do these trips. Look no further than our FAs. Who is more succeptable to the effects of a 10 hour flight day...the old pilots who will be bidding them. But wait, wasn't this all about improving safety?

Where is your scientific evidence that flying 10 flight hours extendable to a 15 hour duty day is more safe than flying 8 in 15 or say 8 in 16 for whitlow? This is nothing more than a horse trade and our union is smack right in the middle of it. ALPA is part of the problem.
Spot on DAWGS, thanks.

You listening alfaromeo? What am I thinking...of course you're not.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 07:49 AM
  #1485  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Carl is correct. It had been a few years since I read the by-laws and policy manual. Since then I have talked to the current and former reps and all of them laughed at the question of them selling scope without a MEMRAT vote. Even if it is up to the MEC Council Members, there is not way they are going to approve LOA like this and not send it to MEMRAT.

I recall talking to a few reps that said if pay, scope, or working conditions were greatly altered that it would go to MEMRAT.

As for MEMRAT of LOA's, we can get that, but we would probably have about 20% of the group vote on them. It is a great idea, but first the pilot group as a whole needs to be willing to vote on em. Heck most people do not know that Military Charters can be assigned to reserves now.
There is NOTHING to stop them from selling scope via LOA and no MEMRAT...absolutely nothing. Reps laughing at the suggestion is a long way from a bylaw that prevents it. We have NO SUCH BYLAWS. We don't even have a policy against it.

Yet another reason my DPA card is in.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 08:03 AM
  #1486  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Carl;
You make a point, they could go rouge and sell our soul, but that is hyperbole. I do not know one rep that is willing to even entertain the idea much less act upon it.

Now we have a resolution for you to bring to the LEC meeting.

Carl;
We have gotten in to the mud about issues and that is fine. I too have issues with a few things within ALPA. Do not take being Pro ALPA as me stating I am 100% satisfied with the way things are being run. My position is based on the fact that what needs fixing should be fixed within the confines of the current structure. I also know you do not feel that way.
Whatever LM is or isn't I think we all should wait and see what he does or does not do. If it is more of the same, it just solidifies your position. I do hope that ALPA has a whole realizes that we are stronger as a whole and not separate independent associations. From some of the decisions and actions at the BOD I do beleive that some of the angst is floating to the top. To what degree will be determined going forward.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 08:57 AM
  #1487  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FedElta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Retired, again...
Posts: 608
Default acl

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Carl is correct. It had been a few years since I read the by-laws and policy manual. Since then I have talked to the current and former reps and all of them laughed at the question of them selling scope without a MEMRAT vote. Even if it is up to the MEC Council Members, there is not way they are going to approve LOA like this and not send it to MEMRAT.

I recall talking to a few reps that said if pay, scope, or working conditions were greatly altered that it would go to MEMRAT.

As for MEMRAT of LOA's, we can get that, but we would probably have about 20% of the group vote on them. It is a great idea, but first the pilot group as a whole needs to be willing to vote on em. Heck most people do not know that Military Charters can be assigned to reserves now.
The fact that we have poor voter participation currently is no reason/ excuse not to have MEMRAT. It also limits the ability of the squeaky wheels to complain if they didn't even vote......been there, seen that.
FedElta is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 09:00 AM
  #1488  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

If a bunch of the squeaky wheels starting voting against the "silent majority" it may by default more more get involved.

FYP, I have not issue with MEMRAT of LOA's
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 10:05 AM
  #1489  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,703
Default

Originally Posted by DAWGS
I think Carl has a valid point. You say JFK-LAX to support your argument, when that is in the minority since it goes over 10 hours. The majority of east-west trips could be done as a turn with the new NPRM and you know these are the trips Carl is referring too. You are right in the fact that the top 10 percent would do these trips. Look no further than our FAs. Who is more succeptable to the effects of a 10 hour flight day...the old pilots who will be bidding them. But wait, wasn't this all about improving safety?

Where is your scientific evidence that flying 10 flight hours extendable to a 15 hour duty day is more safe than flying 8 in 15 or say 8 in 16 for whitlow? This is nothing more than a horse trade and our union is smack right in the middle of it. ALPA is part of the problem.

Flying day turns in my body cycle was the most rested I have ever been as a airline pilot. Slept in my own bed every night. No disruptions, all nighters ect... Trying to run the safety flag up on the turns is not going to work. You will never have a more rested crew then one that is flying 2 turns a week compared to the standard 3 to 5 day trips. Lets not even through international into the mix.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-20-2010, 10:10 AM
  #1490  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Flying day turns in my body cycle was the most rested I have ever been as a airline pilot. Slept in my own bed every night. No disruptions, all nighters ect... Trying to run the safety flag up on the turns is not going to work. You will never have a more rested crew then one that is flying 2 turns a week compared to the standard 3 to 5 day trips. Lets not even through international into the mix.
10 bucks says you won't fly any of them out of JFK with your seniority.... They'll be around for us gutter dwellers to commute in the night before.. and spend the next night here too... yeah yeah yeah I know.. commuting is a choice. bah
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 11:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 12:27 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices