Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2010, 05:19 PM
  #1151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So what, truck drivers get paid more per mile than we do... what's your point?
I know several truck drivers who get paid a lot more than I do as a FO. Some even make more than our junior Captains.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 05:23 PM
  #1152  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Military wasn't really an option for me- I was 6 weeks premature when I was born and ended up with 20/400 uncorrected distance vision. My senior year in college when I already had 1500 hours of flight time was when I found out that they were starting to accept PRK in the Air Force. I immediately jumped on it, but it was a 2 year wait before I could start pilot training after the surgery, then 2 years of pilot training and a 10 year commitment.
Of course it was an option. You just said so. You just didn't want to make the time commitment.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
That being said, what is your suggestion for a civilian pilot in this environment? What is the ideal routing now without undercutting wages? I want to see your education on the subject.
I just gave you my education on the subject. You've added an additional caveat of not wanting to wait for a 10+ year commitment, but that doesn't change what I believe is the best path for a civilian pilot to take.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I don't care to play the blame game... which I think is why we get into it so much.
I think why we're "getting into it so much" is because my opinion is contrary to the vast majority of the pilots on this forum. The vast majority are current or former RJ pilots. I rarely see anyone argue with the many posts from RJ guys that place all the blame for everything in their lives and careers on the major pilots that sold scope. My almost singular contrary opinion is the reason we're getting into it.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 05:27 PM
  #1153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Maybe I misunderstand Carl's logic, and his attack is on the RJ pilot that actually tries to encourage the breakdown of scope. I despise the RJDC, Ford, Lawson, and everyone of their kind. I feel this way because the group of pilots I worked with at the regionals had only one aspiration: get to a major. Not pull the major's flying down to their crappy world, but to lift themselves out of the filth. I've NEVER heard anyone in my generation of regional pilots asking for bigger equipment, although I'm sure a few who made in the top of the seniority list (the page of shame) salivate over mainline equipment.

Outside of the RJDC, and similar efforts, I think it's wrong to criticize any RJ pilot for merely flying an RJ. The scope provisions inherited by...well, say, Carl's generation were theirs to loose. It was their job to maintain what could only be given up by them.

A guy coming up the system, provded he doesn't scab or break other union rules, or advocates for the deterioration of scope, is entitled to choose any legal path that is open to him. If that path to a major goes through a regional, it's because it has been opened by people that failed to keep it in-house, for whatever reason.

It is absolutely absurd for anyone that was handed an airline free of scope exceptions, and during their tenure failed to keep it that way, to lecture anyone that comes through the system he created with his own failures.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 05:45 PM
  #1154  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Outside of the RJDC, and similar efforts, I think it's wrong to criticize any RJ pilot for merely flying an RJ.
That is half the problem. Period. That's not criticism, that is a fact. Here's my criticism: "Don't make the RJ choice, then whine about how the majors aren't hiring, or worse yet...complain about how you lost 6 years of longevity because your RJ airline made the majors stop hiring."

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
A guy coming up the system, provded he doesn't scab or break other union rules, or advocates for the deterioration of scope, is entitled to choose any legal path that is open to him.
Never said he didn't have a right. Just don't complain about how your life is turning out because of the job you interviewed for and accepted. And don't blame major pilots for "forcing" you to interview and accept that RJ job.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
It is absolutely absurd for anyone that was handed an airline free of scope exceptions, and during their tenure failed to keep it that way, to lecture anyone that comes through the system he created with his own failures.
We did fail, and I accept that. You weren't around when it was done to feel what incredible scare tactics were like. A majority of us caved in. We failed. Nice to hear that you would have been tougher than any of us older guys. With that said, I'm not lecturing you. I'm simply responding to RJ guys blaming everything on major pilots. You're so used to operating in your little RJ echo chambers, that you come unhinged when somebody challenges you. Get used to it.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 05:52 PM
  #1155  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Of course it was an option. You just said so. You just didn't want to make the time commitment.



I just gave you my education on the subject. You've added an additional caveat of not wanting to wait for a 10+ year commitment, but that doesn't change what I believe is the best path for a civilian pilot to take.



I think why we're "getting into it so much" is because my opinion is contrary to the vast majority of the pilots on this forum. The vast majority are current or former RJ pilots. I rarely see anyone argue with the many posts from RJ guys that place all the blame for everything in their lives and careers on the major pilots that sold scope. My almost singular contrary opinion is the reason we're getting into it.

Carl
It wasn't the 10 year committment- it was finding out that it might actually have been an option when I was already at the jumping off point after flying corporate and flight instrcuting and could get an aviation job that had quality flight time to get to my career goals. The thing that killed the deal was the 2 year wait after the surgery. I was already an RJ captain by the time that 2 years was up.

An option? Yes, technically. Viable? Not really.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 05:55 PM
  #1156  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
It wasn't the 10 year committment- it was finding out that it might actually have been an option when I was already at the jumping off point after flying corporate and flight instrcuting and could get an aviation job that had quality flight time to get to my career goals. The thing that killed the deal was the 2 year wait after the surgery. I was already an RJ captain by the time that 2 years was up.

An option? Yes, technically. Viable? Not really.
An option, Yes. You asked my opinion, I gave you my answer.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 06:02 PM
  #1157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Carl: its your fault

former RJ pilot #1: No, its YOUR fault!

Carl: No, Its YOUR FAULT!

former RJ pilot #2: No, ITS YOUR FAULT!!

Carl: NO, NO, NO. IT'S YOUR FAULT!!!!

former RJ pilot #3: NO!!!!!! IT'S YOUR FAULT!!!!!!!

OK - UNCLE! Can you guys start up a brand new thread, and quit clogging all the DAL threads? I'll even give you the title:

"SCOPE - IT'S YOUR FAULT!"
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 06:13 PM
  #1158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Carl: its your fault

former RJ pilot #1: No, its YOUR fault!

Carl: No, Its YOUR FAULT!

former RJ pilot #2: No, ITS YOUR FAULT!!

Carl: NO, NO, NO. IT'S YOUR FAULT!!!!

former RJ pilot #3: NO!!!!!! IT'S YOUR FAULT!!!!!!!

OK - UNCLE! Can you guys start up a brand new thread, and quit clogging all the DAL threads? I'll even give you the title:

"SCOPE - IT'S YOUR FAULT!"
You're spamming.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 06:16 PM
  #1159  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
You do know that management had the right to merge the airlines and not even tell us about until we saw it on CNN? Right, you have read our contract and see the section where management is explicitly given the right to merge the carriers with no contractual changes from us? Please tell me that you have read that?

That is what happened when we merged with Western, that is what happened when NW merged with Republic, and that is what happened in all the other mergers so far. So the only leverage that we had in this merger is leverage that we created out of thin air. Management had the right to tell us to stay in our old contract, give us no stock, and then merge anyway. It would have slowed down the process, but it would have happened with us or without us. So it is pretty funny that you claim we passed up leverage when we totally created every ounce of our leverage from nothing.
"If there's going to be consolidation in the airline industry, it most likely will have to go right through Lee Moak, and he's not going to make it easy. Moak, the powerful chairman of the Delta(DAL_) chapter of the Air Line Pilots Association union, recently discussed mergers before about two dozen Delta pilot union leaders at an Atlanta hotel.

"Delta pilots are open to it, and we are going to be relevant to the process," he said. "We will be at the table. We will be involved. And without us, it will not happen." - From an article at TheStreet.com on 12/12/07
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 06:18 PM
  #1160  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Someone asked me this earlier and I don't have a clue what the answer is:

Hypothetically, if DPA is voted in... what happens to Lee Moak at national since DAL is no longer an ALPA carrier?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices