Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Retirement at age 70

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2019, 05:21 AM
  #271  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 6,009
Default

Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
When the old man has to be watched like a hawk, then it isn't his seat anymore.
I’m sure the same goes for baby sitting the child in the right seat.
captjns is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 05:48 AM
  #272  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
Default

One of the captains' duties is to supervise and mentor the first officer. When the first officer has to supervise the captain due to declining cognitive and physical ability, then it is the captain's responsibility to put pride aside and step down. Unfortunately there are those in aviation who will never let go of their pride, and the profession as a whole suffers for it.
Flyfalcons is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 08:12 AM
  #273  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,761
Default

Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
One of the captains' duties is to supervise and mentor the first officer. When the first officer has to supervise the captain due to declining cognitive and physical ability, then it is the captain's responsibility to put pride aside and step down. Unfortunately there are those in aviation who will never let go of their pride, and the profession as a whole suffers for it.
Always comforting to know someone is on senility patrol.
badflaps is online now  
Old 02-27-2019, 10:49 AM
  #274  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by Bluesideup1
No, it is about safety. There is an age that the vast majority of people will lose cognitive abilities along with slower reflexes and muscular decline.

Anyone who denies this makes it all about themselves and just wanting to stay in their seat as long as possible and damn the safety of those on the airplane.

Stop being so selfish and retire before you end up killing a plane load of people. Because by the time you think you should have retired it will probably be to late and if left to our own devices some would prefer to die at the controls.
History repeating itself here, from the ‘90s. Same arguments, different players. Sorry but the reality of history is not on your side.

How many years now since the age increase, and how many plane loads killed by old men?

Swiiinnng ana misss.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 02:45 PM
  #275  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,410
Default

Originally Posted by MySaabStory
The death of an average male in the US is 79. Long haul pilots seem to be a lot less. Do you really want to leave less than 9 years to enjoy your retirement?!
That seems low, but even if it's correct that's the AVERAGE which includes a lot of folks who don't bother to take care of themselves. Most pilots will be above average in that regard.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 03:02 PM
  #276  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,804
Default

We can argue about cognition and physical fitness ad infinitum.

The problem for me is changing the rules in the middle of the game.

I believe it was an unconscionable act to raise the retirement age to 65 while thousands upon thousands of furloughed pilots remained on the streets. It delayed recalls by years and cost those pilots hundreds of thousands of dollars over their career. But what is done is done.

Due to the lost decade many of those pilots are only now getting close to upgrade, so raising the retirement to 67 or 70 would negatively impact the career progression of the SAME PILOTS who were screwed the first time around, delaying their upgrades and ultimately their career earnings.

If we decide it is best for the profession to allow pilots to fly to 67 or 70, then I submit that the only FAIR way to accomplish that goal is to start it on the day that legislation is passed, with all newhire pilots after that date. Existing pilots would be grandfathered - for better or for worse - and required to retire by age 65.

I know as a profession we tend to be greedy SOBs. But attacking the same group twice is dirty pool and will only serve to divide pilot groups at a time when unity could raise the bar for the entire profession.

As an alternative, I suggest those who retire consider giving back to the aviation community by returning to their roots and providing flight instruction to the next generation of pilots.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 03:09 PM
  #277  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,831
Default

Couldn’t agree more with Zap regarding any age increase only applying to new-hires entering the 121 world post passage of any legislation.

Some made it through The Lost Decade relatively unscathed while others took a major beating. Let’s not kick them in the groin again.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 03:49 PM
  #278  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
That seems low, but even if it's correct that's the AVERAGE which includes a lot of folks who don't bother to take care of themselves. Most pilots will be above average in that regard.
Haha. You must be a captain flying with young, fit first officers. Taking a look at our “older” group, I’m guess we are mostly BELOW the average.
MySaabStory is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 06:21 PM
  #279  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,410
Default

Originally Posted by MySaabStory
Haha. You must be a captain flying with young, fit first officers. Taking a look at our “older” group, I’m guess we are mostly BELOW the average.
Our lifestyle can certainly be worse than other white-collar professionals, but it's typically going to still be a lot better than the demographics which really drive the average longevity down.

But for most of us, unless you have garbage schedules and a crap commute you do have the time to be healthy if you so choose
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 10:20 PM
  #280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100
History repeating itself here, from the ‘90s. Same arguments, different players. Sorry but the reality of history is not on your side.

How many years now since the age increase, and how many plane loads killed by old men?

Swiiinnng ana misss.
You conclusion is only valid until it isn't and by then it is too late

So we should just keep rolling the dice until plane loads are killed by old men then walk the age back?

Do you think you can go on indefinitely as a Captain? When is the right age to ask them to leave? Can a 99 year old be a good Captain?

. Plus even now the right seater is usually far younger but shouldn't be the one acting as PIC when an old guy is too slow to handle things.
Bluesideup1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
8-capt
Cargo
44
11-19-2009 12:42 AM
Bucking Bar
Aviation Law
69
07-18-2009 07:48 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 04:20 PM
numbersguy
Cargo
91
03-11-2009 07:04 AM
hjs1971
Military
12
12-01-2008 02:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices