Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AA Recall Rumor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2010, 05:38 AM
  #171  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,665
Default

Originally Posted by Oldfreightdawg

Some of the rumors indicated that a 100 seat jet at AA would "replace" some AE flying.


Stand by to stand by...
American Pilots Change the Flight Plan - TheStreet
A solution, Bates said, might be for American to buy hundreds of 100- to 120-seat jets, eliminate its American Eagle subsidiary and take over the routes flown by 50-seaters. American could then hire the Eagle pilots. The per-seat cost would decline and passengers would be happier with the bigger planes, but not so happy with the reduced frequencies. "I'm hoping that's part of the plan going forward, although I haven't yet broached it with management," Bates said.
If Eagle is "elimninated" then what happens to the sub-100 seat flying? I agree some of it can be replaced with fewer frequencies on a 100 seater, but there will still be a market for 50 seaters, 70seaters, turboprop flying in the Caribbean, etc. I'm all for creative solutions between the APA/AE ALPA, but lets tie this thing up tight without making matter worse by outsourcing sub-100 seat flying to a 3rd party carrier.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 08:50 AM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 1,827
Default

Keep Executive as an ATR only carrier and bring the 70 seaters to Mainline AA. That would do it.
AtlCSIP is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 09:16 AM
  #173  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
American Pilots Change the Flight Plan - TheStreet


If Eagle is "elimninated" then what happens to the sub-100 seat flying? I agree some of it can be replaced with fewer frequencies on a 100 seater, but there will still be a market for 50 seaters, 70seaters, turboprop flying in the Caribbean, etc. I'm all for creative solutions between the APA/AE ALPA, but lets tie this thing up tight without making matter worse by outsourcing sub-100 seat flying to a 3rd party carrier.
There's no law that prevents turboprop and sub 100 seat flying on the AA certificate.
80drvr is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 11:21 AM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by 80drvr
There's no law that prevents turboprop and sub 100 seat flying on the AA certificate.

and we have a winner.......

it will require a subsection in the current contract to slip in the Eagle pay scales and work rules for the "regional division" of AA...
Mason32 is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 04:51 PM
  #175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Oldfreightdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: B-737
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
and we have a winner.......

it will require a subsection in the current contract to slip in the Eagle pay scales and work rules for the "regional division" of AA...
Not altogether impossible. AA proposed to APA and AE ALPA in October of 2000 a "commuter supplement" which encapsulated AE pilots and AA pilots under a single contract and seniority list. ALPA turned it down.

In fairness, it was not surprising that AE ALPA resisted because at the time APA wanted nothing to do with AE pilots. In fact, APA worked openly to convince AE pilots to go with ALPA in the late 90's, and ALPA was more than happy to recruit them. Moreover, regional flying was expanding rapidly and it seemed that it was the future.

In retrospect, it is unfortunate that a deal could not be forged. The real question is if a "regional division" can be established who will get the jobs?
Oldfreightdawg is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 05:05 PM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Default

Originally Posted by Oldfreightdawg
Not altogether impossible. AA proposed to APA and AE ALPA in October of 2000 a "commuter supplement" which encapsulated AE pilots and AA pilots under a single contract and seniority list. ALPA turned it down.

In fairness, it was not surprising that AE ALPA resisted because at the time APA wanted nothing to do with AE pilots. In fact, APA worked openly to convince AE pilots to go with ALPA in the late 90's, and ALPA was more than happy to recruit them. Moreover, regional flying was expanding rapidly and it seemed that it was the future.

In retrospect, it is unfortunate that a deal could not be forged. The real question is if a "regional division" can be established who will get the jobs?
I do not want to be rude but you are clueless.
mwa1 is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 05:40 PM
  #177  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Keep Executive as an ATR only carrier and bring the 70 seaters to Mainline AA. That would do it.

Don't even go there bro
ERJF15 is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 06:02 PM
  #178  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,754
Default

Originally Posted by Oldfreightdawg
Not altogether impossible. AA proposed to APA and AE ALPA in October of 2000 a "commuter supplement" which encapsulated AE pilots and AA pilots under a single contract and seniority list. ALPA turned it down.
It's not quite as simple as saying AE ALPA turned it down. You wouldn't have eaten that $h!t sandwich either.
Swedish Blender is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:44 AM
  #179  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,665
Default

Originally Posted by Oldfreightdawg
In retrospect, it is unfortunate that a deal could not be forged. The real question is if a "regional division" can be established who will get the jobs?
Regional Division pilots should be fenced into the current fleet operated by AE. Any growth aircraft like a 100 seater, or additional 70 seaters should be offered to current AA pilots, then furloughed AA pilots. Once all the furloughed guys have been given the opportunity you can drop the fences for the Regional Division pilots to bid whatever their seniority can hold (probably not much different than what they are currently flying).

In the event the Regional Division shrinks before any growth at mainline occurs, RJ pilots will have the opportunity to displace out of the Regional Division into a mainline bid status, provided their seniority can hold something(such as the top few hundred who already have flowthrough numbers with enough seniority to hold S80/737 slots). If nobody proffers to displace then reductions result in a furlough at the Regional Division, which would occur anyways if AE were still a standalone operation.

Its not a perfect solution, but something can be worked out for the best
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 06:49 AM
  #180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Regional Division pilots should be fenced into the current fleet operated by AE. Any growth aircraft like a 100 seater, or additional 70 seaters should be offered to current AA pilots, then furloughed AA pilots. Once all the furloughed guys have been given the opportunity you can drop the fences for the Regional Division pilots to bid whatever their seniority can hold (probably not much different than what they are currently flying).

In the event the Regional Division shrinks before any growth at mainline occurs, RJ pilots will have the opportunity to displace out of the Regional Division into a mainline bid status, provided their seniority can hold something(such as the top few hundred who already have flowthrough numbers with enough seniority to hold S80/737 slots). If nobody proffers to displace then reductions result in a furlough at the Regional Division, which would occur anyways if AE were still a standalone operation.

Its not a perfect solution, but something can be worked out for the best

wow, sounds like you guys want a flow through, flow back program again....

how'd that work for ya last time?
Mason32 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Riddler
Military
959
08-04-2010 09:17 PM
Da Magic
Regional
117
11-15-2009 04:57 PM
imbroke
Regional
395
08-26-2009 10:32 AM
DWS1
Flexjet
4
06-23-2009 12:15 PM
vagabond
Pilot Health
8
01-23-2009 10:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices