Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes >

1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2010, 07:57 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

...........

Last edited by Grumble; 07-21-2010 at 08:00 PM. Reason: duplicate
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 08:00 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
This may serve to keep pilots IN the military. How many TACAIR guys have 1500 hours at the end of their commitment? That's why the airlines in the past have multiplied TACAIR time by a factor of 1.2 when hiring. If the law is a hard 1500 then there are military pilots who won't qualify. And if they have to stay beyond their initial commitment then they might as well do 20 and THEN go to the airlines.
I finished my first tour with that, with 4 years left on my commitment at the time. A LOT of Hornet guys (Navy anyway) are leaving their first sea tour with 1000+ F-18 hours, not including time spent in training, thanks to the op tempo of the last 10 years.

Originally Posted by Jedinight
I see 2 things may happen; many will not become pilots if regional pay stays as it is. Why waste 60k or more to become a pilot when I’m only going to make 30k at a regional for x amount of years. Of course the recruiters will sell: “you will be Capt or in a Major in 3 years and making 80k plus!!” Which we all know is bull!!

Secondly, many will start and not get done. Not everyone has what it takes to teach for a year and it will be really hard to build time any other way.

Unless you buy time or buy your own Plane. Which not everyone can do and it would be a waste of money in my option.
Sooooo.... did you just get into aviation or what? This has been going on for 20 years, and 60K even 10 years ago would be a bargain compared to what most paid that were naive enough to pony up the cash.
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 08:22 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by CommutR4Life
to go from a C-172 (1,100lb or so)
go from SE piston pusher

Son... some things just don't add up.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 08:29 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CommutR4Life's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: In front of my computer
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
Son... some things just don't add up.
I hope your not trying my knowledge of C-172 weights, cause I'll tell you right now I don't remember! And yeah, a single engine piston 'pushing' though the air; not sure what your getting at....
CommutR4Life is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 08:40 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 89
Default

Okay, correct me if I am wrong, but the Captain of 3407 had some 3,300+ hrs and the F/O 2,200+ hrs (Both qualified for an ATP).

Also please correct me if I am wrong, but isn't stall awareness and recovery lesson #2 after learning to fly straight and level....?

Also PLEASE help me understand who in their right mind would go through a 60,000+ dollar education to start out making 16$ an hour on reserve. Sleeping in crash pads, eating 3 meals a day out of vending machines, and flying all-night sleep deprived and sick...

There are almost 90,000 flights in the US daily. A decent proportion of these flights have a crew member with less the 1500 hours... I'd say these none-ATP licensed pilots have a decent safety record for getting people where they need to go on time.

If passengers want pilots with 1500 hours to fly in airline cockpits. Then why are they not compensating these pilots for the 1500 hours of crap they got to eat to get there? Heart surgeons get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year because they are directly responsible for a persons life on a daily basis. Why are pilots making less the 20K yearly when they are responsible for 50+ lives, for 7 legs a day?

Please HELP me understand some of this better... It seems to me that this Bill is a knee jerk reaction to the FACT that Pilots CAN screw up (regardless of experience), and when they do people die....
Corndawg88 is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 08:40 PM
  #66  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by CommutR4Life
I hope your not trying my knowledge of C-172 weights, cause I'll tell you right now I don't remember! And yeah, a single engine piston 'pushing' though the air; not sure what your getting at....
The prop is in the front on a 172
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 08:46 PM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 89
Default

Dude lets be honest, a 172 pusher WOULD BE FREAKING AWESOME!!!!
Corndawg88 is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 09:01 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 474
Default

I agree with those of you who say the 1500 hour flight time limitation wouldn't have necessarily helped in the Colgan accident but.....who cares what ultimately brings about a change like this? We all know that a 250 hour pilot has no business flying an airliner. I don't care if the unfortunate Colgan accident brings a change or if 400 elected Congress simultaneously have a vision from last night's sleep. Whatever brings about a necessary change is fine with me. If needed, they can "refine" the 1500 hour requirement later (and I think they will)
globalexpress is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 09:22 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Phoenix
Posts: 732
Default

heart surgeons dont vote on contracts. Why are 7 yr fos flying 75 plus seat jets making less than 40 grand a year? We all are worth more, so i dont know that the publics outcry of more experienced pilots is going to do pay wise. Regionals have got to step it up when negotiation times come up for work rules and pay.
pilotrob23 is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 09:37 PM
  #70  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
There are various levels of "captain" and based on days at sea and equipment operated. It goes by tonnage.... all the way up to the "unlimited tonnage" license.
Isn't this the was licensing worked in the late 40s until the end of the CAA and transition to FAA?

I remember talking to B-29 vets who said that all the airlines were after them back in the day after WWII because they had the military equivalents of "unlimited" civilian licenses. One of them (who last I know lived in Montana) didn't fly a single minute after the end of the war and had to keep turning offers down into the 50s.
aviatorhi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8rrob
United
13
09-02-2010 06:18 PM
jsled
Union Talk
2
05-18-2010 08:57 AM
BoilerUP
Regional
102
02-26-2010 02:31 PM
CaliPilot
Aviation Law
1
09-19-2009 11:33 AM
whoareyou310
Flight Schools and Training
7
09-23-2008 10:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices