Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes >

1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2010, 07:32 AM
  #401  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Baron B-55 Left Seat
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
Thanks for laying out your credentials in advance. At least we're ready for your "reasoning."



Ouch. I guess the criticism hit pretty close to home. Gee, I thought these forums were here for people to express their opinions and (perhaps) give low timers like yourself some guidance.



First off, hazing anyone anytime is inappropriate. It is, IMHO, a safety hazard to have a low time pilot in either seat of a Part 121 aircraft. Both pilots should and soon will be required to have ATP licenses. The paying public deserves no less.



It has nothing to do with respect. It has everything to do with experience and qualification. Just because you have a pilot license doesn't mean you're qualified to fly a Part 121 airplane. Just because you have a driver's license doesn't mean you're qualified to drive in a NASCAR race.

Part 121 is the BIG LEAGUE, regardless of whether the airline is Mainline, LCC or Regional. And 250 hour wonders have no business being there. Period, end of story.



So, in other words, you are completely clueless about the airlines. But look at the bright side. Only another 1120 hours instructing, pass your ATP and you'll have the MINIMUM qualifications to APPLY for an airline job.



Keep working hard. Perhaps you'll land that entry level airline job in 5 years or so.


Your reply is exactly the kind of crap i expected.


Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
Ouch. I guess the criticism hit pretty close to home. Gee, I thought these forums were here for people to express their opinions and (perhaps) give low timers like yourself some guidance.

These forums are absolutely for opinions, that doesnt give you guys the right to be rude all the time. I see way more opinions are rude remarks than guidance, nice try though.

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
So, in other words, you are completely clueless about the airlines. But look at the bright side. Only another 1120 hours instructing, pass your ATP and you'll have the MINIMUM qualifications to APPLY for an airline job.
Dont know what makes you think im clueless about the airlines we are only talking opinions here dont get high and mighty, its not a secretive job you have. And since i have already explained that i do not believe that just anyone can fly 121 especially at 250 hours im pretty sure we are in agreement there. Also dont know what the 1120 hour remarks has to do with anything, but i have long since given up on hoping for logical replies to this argument. It all goes back to hours and rude snide remarks. Typical.

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
First off, hazing anyone anytime is inappropriate. It is, IMHO, a safety hazard to have a low time pilot in either seat of a Part 121 aircraft. Both pilots should and soon will be required to have ATP licenses. The paying public deserves no less.
Hazing would depend on what type of hazing, a captain being a harsh and making the FO work for that seat is perfectly fine in my opinion. The saftey hazard bit, i would agree that a low time pilot is less safe than a higher time one, however i have seen guys with very little hours be much more fluent on decisions and flying skills, lets try not to generalize so much.


Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
It has nothing to do with respect. It has everything to do with experience and qualification. Just because you have a pilot license doesn't mean you're qualified to fly a Part 121 airplane. Just because you have a driver's license doesn't mean you're qualified to drive in a NASCAR race.
Now for the biggie, It has EVERYTHING to do with respect. Want to know how i know? Cause to you guys, im a low time pilot and i feel disrespected just reading these forums. Every time i come on here its 19 of you guys against 2 or 3 low time pilots arguing until you turn blue in the face and while arguing with them you degrade every pilot that sits around 250-300 hours. It is 100% about respect. No one here can logically argue that a 250 hour guy is ready for 121, im not arguing that and any person who would is simply not thinking clearly. What i am arguing is that you guys are not little kids, you are working professionals, and this is the ONLY industry i have ever seen where newbies are constantly degraded and expected to not complain when they are. How about getting on your training dept to make stuff happen diff if fresh FOs are still clueless...?

And before anyone else chimes in please read my first post. When i say respect im not talking about flying respect, that has to be earned, we are talking about mutual PEOPLE respect, respect for the workplace and respect for your fellow pilots. Yes i respect my elders before that one comes up too...

If you think this isnt about respect then we simply cannot continue this argument since you are out of touch with what im talking about.

Last edited by asims33; 08-18-2010 at 07:45 AM.
asims33 is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 07:41 AM
  #402  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Baron B-55 Left Seat
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
Uh, what would 100,000 pounds have to do with anything? Only about 15,000 pounds heavier than the CRJ that I'm currently flying. The CRJ-1000 will have a max weight 91,800 lb (41,640 kg).

I think CRJ captains will be fine in a 100,000 airplane. Or a 1,000,000 pound one. Emirates is putting new hires into the A380, and some of those will likely come from a CRJ. I know several former CRJ guys who went straight into the B747 for cargo operators, and Boeing 757/767 for US cargo operators. One at my company from the CRJ to the A340, and one to the A330.

Systems and Avionics (glass cockpit) are compatible between a CRJ and any modern FMS glass cockpit aircraft. A more difficult (in my opinion) transition might be from a DC-9, or early B737-100/200 to modern, "big" airplanes (having never flown a CRJ or similar glass cockpit aircraft).

Awesome to hear they are moving again, but that has told me nothing about how the cockpit feels between an RJ captain and a 380 captain. Hopefully some of these guys remember their own words, thats all im saying. And the 100k pounds was more geared towards the 200
asims33 is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 08:31 AM
  #403  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Globerunner513's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Hiding under the counter
Posts: 276
Default

I'm not going to read through the entire thread, as most of what I've read is the same back and forth for 40 pages.

funny, I just wrote a big long thing about all this back and forth and realized how pointless it all is. So to summarize:

I'm a low time pilot. 130hr Private (starting instrument this fall). Doing what I can right now to gain experience and contacts in the industry. I have no qualms with this law. Sure it'll take longer to find a 121 job, and that's a bummer. But it's not life changing. I never expected to find a job right out of school anyway.

Arguing online is like.....[insert witty comment here]

Last edited by Globerunner513; 08-18-2010 at 08:49 AM.
Globerunner513 is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 09:02 AM
  #404  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,475
Default

Respect works in both directions. Everyone has been at 250 hours at some point and we remember what it was like. I had over 3,000 hours before flying at a 121 carrier, yet we did not sit around and whine about the higher time guys.
The new rule will help weed out the "entitlement" generation pilots and bring up the wages at regionals and make it better for professional pilots.
Rama is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 09:09 AM
  #405  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Baron B-55 Left Seat
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Rama
Respect works in both directions. Everyone has been at 250 hours at some point and we remember what it was like. I had over 3,000 hours before flying at a 121 carrier, yet we did not sit around and whine about the higher time guys.
The new rule will help weed out the "entitlement" generation pilots and bring up the wages at regionals and make it better for professional pilots.

I have not shown i dont respect anyone.


And i support this bill for the most part i dont want to get into the politics just read these posts before replying please.
asims33 is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 09:34 AM
  #406  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by Globerunner513
I'm a low time pilot. 130hr Private (starting instrument this fall). Doing what I can right now to gain experience and contacts in the industry. I have no qualms with this law. Sure it'll take longer to find a 121 job, and that's a bummer. But it's not life changing. I never expected to find a job right out of school anyway.
Exactly. Work hard. Pay your dues. You'll get there. And along the way, your obvious maturity will help you learn what you need to know faster than banging your fist on the table screaming about "respect."

Remember, you can only command respect, you cannot demand it.

From your post, I think you know that already.

Originally Posted by Rama
Respect works in both directions. Everyone has been at 250 hours at some point and we remember what it was like. I had over 3,000 hours before flying at a 121 carrier, yet we did not sit around and whine about the higher time guys.
So true. It took me 11.5 years of active duty and 5200 military flight hours before I landed my first airline job. There are guys I fly with who went the civilian route, got hired first and hit the growth seam, upgrading in 18 months. However, they did what it took to get there. Bid undesirable bases, etc. They didn't complain and those of us junior to them who took longer to upgrade don't hold it against them.

The new rule will help weed out the "entitlement" generation pilots and bring up the wages at regionals and make it better for professional pilots.
Both unintended but VERY desirable consequences.
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 11:27 AM
  #407  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by asims33
I have not shown i dont respect anyone.


And i support this bill for the most part i dont want to get into the politics just read these posts before replying please.
Whoa there tiger! I think your letting your mind run a little to hard with this. Kudos for your passion regarding aviation but i think you missed the IAP and went straight to the FAF! Maybe my viewpoint will help. I dont think most high time guys disrespect low-timers, I believe that they have been around long enough to know what an experienced pilot is. Your correct in the fact that there are some guys who cross the line but most of us dont. Its a fact that passengers want experience in the cockpit and if you were to tell them that a 300 dude was in the front, they MIGHT walk off the airplane. Would you? Would you put the most important people in your life on that airplane and hope for the best? I think your view point may change when you gain more time and experience. Meanwhile, keep at it, im sure we will see you soon in a 121 cockpit with MORE experience then you have now.
brianb is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 12:01 PM
  #408  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by asims33
Your reply is exactly the kind of crap i expected.





These forums are absolutely for opinions, that doesnt give you guys the right to be rude all the time. I see way more opinions are rude remarks than guidance, nice try though.



Dont know what makes you think im clueless about the airlines we are only talking opinions here dont get high and mighty, its not a secretive job you have. And since i have already explained that i do not believe that just anyone can fly 121 especially at 250 hours im pretty sure we are in agreement there. Also dont know what the 1120 hour remarks has to do with anything, but i have long since given up on hoping for logical replies to this argument. It all goes back to hours and rude snide remarks. Typical.



Hazing would depend on what type of hazing, a captain being a harsh and making the FO work for that seat is perfectly fine in my opinion. The saftey hazard bit, i would agree that a low time pilot is less safe than a higher time one, however i have seen guys with very little hours be much more fluent on decisions and flying skills, lets try not to generalize so much.




Now for the biggie, It has EVERYTHING to do with respect. Want to know how i know? Cause to you guys, im a low time pilot and i feel disrespected just reading these forums. Every time i come on here its 19 of you guys against 2 or 3 low time pilots arguing until you turn blue in the face and while arguing with them you degrade every pilot that sits around 250-300 hours. It is 100% about respect. No one here can logically argue that a 250 hour guy is ready for 121, im not arguing that and any person who would is simply not thinking clearly. What i am arguing is that you guys are not little kids, you are working professionals, and this is the ONLY industry i have ever seen where newbies are constantly degraded and expected to not complain when they are. How about getting on your training dept to make stuff happen diff if fresh FOs are still clueless...?

And before anyone else chimes in please read my first post. When i say respect im not talking about flying respect, that has to be earned, we are talking about mutual PEOPLE respect, respect for the workplace and respect for your fellow pilots. Yes i respect my elders before that one comes up too...

If you think this isnt about respect then we simply cannot continue this argument since you are out of touch with what im talking about.
Besides your obvious inexperience you come across naive. This is the only industry where newbies are constantly degraded and expected not to complain?

Wow, that right there shows how naive and in a bubble you have lived your life. Just off the top of my head from personal or close relationships I can think of many who are worse than pilots. Try doctors, lawyers, law enforcement, nurses, firefighters, engineers, plumbers and just about every trade out there, dentists and accountants. You ever experienced life as a first year cop or firefighter? You think a newbie engineer who is hired at someplace like AT&T or Intel is treated like an equal? Sorry bud but you are living in dreamland. I'm not saying it's right but it is what it is and there is a purpose for it. In the real world you have thick skin to survive.
likeitis is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 12:21 PM
  #409  
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
bcrosier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by asims33
Dont know what makes you think im clueless about the airlines we are only talking opinions here dont get high and mighty, its not a secretive job you have.
Let's see....perhaps it's the fact that you haven't worked for one, and based on your total time I'm guessing you don't have much time in a larger/faster aircraft designed for a crew rather than a single pilot. There is a difference, and until you've done some of it in busy airspace and crappy weather it's hard to appreciate. It's not brain surgery, but there is a difference - I think a many on here take offense that you would presume to really understand what we're talking about without having real experience in it.

It all goes back to hours and rude snide remarks. Typical.
You of course realize that you are coming off with the same attitude here...

Hazing would depend on what type of hazing, a captain being a harsh and making the FO work for that seat is perfectly fine in my opinion.
Here you are showing your lack of understanding of crew operations. There is NO PLACE for nonsense like this in the cockpit. Yeah it sounds tough and cool in all of the old movies and novels - but it is very detrimental to crew interaction and safety.

The saftey hazard bit, i would agree that a low time pilot is less safe than a higher time one, however i have seen guys with very little hours be much more fluent on decisions and flying skills, lets try not to generalize so much.
And I saw a dog who could play the slide whistle. The exception doesn't disprove the rule. I really doubt you've seen too many guys with limited hours with better decision making skills and abilities than higher time pilot - they may have a easier time making a decision, but that may well be because they have less information to draw on and less options to consider. As a friend of a friend put it: "I've found the more ignorant you are about something the simpler it seems."

What i am arguing is that you guys are not little kids, you are working professionals, and this is the ONLY industry i have ever seen where newbies are constantly degraded and expected to not complain when they are.
Really? What industries do you have experience in? I'm pretty sure the medical professions are off of your list...

How about getting on your training dept to make stuff happen diff if fresh FOs are still clueless...?
Yeah, they're real eager to spend more money in lieu of executive bonuses. Besides, you can't make up for experience with a couple more hours of sim time.

When i say respect im not talking about flying respect, that has to be earned, we are talking about mutual PEOPLE respect, respect for the workplace and respect for your fellow pilots.
I have no difficulty respecting anyone who deserves respect (meaning they aren't just a crappy person - regardless of their flight time). I actually have no problem with a low time pilot in a turboprop or jet - I myself was rather low time when I started flying corporate part-time in turboprops and jets. I don't blame the pilots for accepting the positions - as you said, I'd have done so too had the opportunity presented itself. My issue isn't with the individuals, but with a system which allowed this to occur. That said, I do have an issue with those who have the attitude that they are entitled to an airline job at 300 hours (and I recognize you aren't one of them).
bcrosier is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 05:23 PM
  #410  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 1,827
Default

Suffice it to say that 1500 hours is not unreasonable, and regardless of what we might have believed before we had attained it, MOST of us agree with it completely once we have achieved it. It's the old "hindsight is 20/20" thing. Most of us have believed that we were ready for additional piloting responsibility before we actually were, but only realized it in hindsight.

Give the young guys a break. They will realize what they don't know now after they learn it later! Funny world we live in, isn't it!

Blue Skies!

ATL
AtlCSIP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8rrob
United
13
09-02-2010 06:18 PM
jsled
Union Talk
2
05-18-2010 08:57 AM
BoilerUP
Regional
102
02-26-2010 02:31 PM
CaliPilot
Aviation Law
1
09-19-2009 11:33 AM
whoareyou310
Flight Schools and Training
7
09-23-2008 10:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices