1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes
#121
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
A. I'm buying that Cessna first thing in the morning
B. Zoomie, I do agree 250 hour baby pilots should not be put in the right seat of regional jets to "build time/experience". However, you didn't provide a single valid arguement with regards to inexperience being the cause of Buffalo....
B. Zoomie, I do agree 250 hour baby pilots should not be put in the right seat of regional jets to "build time/experience". However, you didn't provide a single valid arguement with regards to inexperience being the cause of Buffalo....
#122
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
hours do translate into safety levels.... even the aviation insurance industry is aware of it, which is why low time pilots pay much more for their insurance. Even plugging around the pattern in a C152, you will make more decisions than you ever will in the right seat of an RJ.... and when in the C152 bopping around the pattern if something does go amiss, or if the weather does turn foul.... when you look to your left all you will see is your own reflection... no Captain to make the decision for you.
#123
Apparently you have never read a Nall report.... they are free from AOPA.org Go read one.
hours do translate into safety levels.... even the aviation insurance industry is aware of it, which is why low time pilots pay much more for their insurance. Even plugging around the pattern in a C152, you will make more decisions than you ever will in the right seat of an RJ.... and when in the C152 bopping around the pattern if something does go amiss, or if the weather does turn foul.... when you look to your left all you will see is your own reflection... no Captain to make the decision for you.
hours do translate into safety levels.... even the aviation insurance industry is aware of it, which is why low time pilots pay much more for their insurance. Even plugging around the pattern in a C152, you will make more decisions than you ever will in the right seat of an RJ.... and when in the C152 bopping around the pattern if something does go amiss, or if the weather does turn foul.... when you look to your left all you will see is your own reflection... no Captain to make the decision for you.
Exactly. If hour levels have no relationship to decision making and safety, why do insurance companies mandate experience levels for high performance aircraft.
Try to get insurance in a Baron with 300 hours, you'll hear the agent laughing at you a 100 miles away.
#124
Apparently you have never read a Nall report.... they are free from AOPA.org Go read one.
hours do translate into safety levels.... even the aviation insurance industry is aware of it, which is why low time pilots pay much more for their insurance. Even plugging around the pattern in a C152, you will make more decisions than you ever will in the right seat of an RJ.... and when in the C152 bopping around the pattern if something does go amiss, or if the weather does turn foul.... when you look to your left all you will see is your own reflection... no Captain to make the decision for you.
hours do translate into safety levels.... even the aviation insurance industry is aware of it, which is why low time pilots pay much more for their insurance. Even plugging around the pattern in a C152, you will make more decisions than you ever will in the right seat of an RJ.... and when in the C152 bopping around the pattern if something does go amiss, or if the weather does turn foul.... when you look to your left all you will see is your own reflection... no Captain to make the decision for you.
#125
I have 1000 hours of turbine helicopter time from the Army there are two Regionals that I could not even submit an application to because they would not recognize my flight time. I flew Blackhawks a twin turbine helicopter that would require a type rating civilian side, yet insurance companys prefer I flew a Cessna 150, that they would count.
#126
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm simply stating that flight instructing does not really prepare you for flying in the 121 or 135 world. The simple fact is that when you're instructing, you are really not "flying" the airplane. As for exceeding the limitations on the airplane, absolutely not!! I do think that pilots looking to fly commercially should have exposure to icing and the cosiderations that brings to the table. As for the speed, you WILL be doing appraoches at well above 200 KIAS. When I first started, it was expected by ATC, and the CA that you were doing 248 to the marker. Granted that was a turboprop and you could get slowed and remain on profile and be configured by 1000' and on speed by 500'.
I believe that someone with a CFI background has more to add to 135/121 flying than someone without.
Too many people dismiss instructing as flying umpteen hundred hours in the practice area or the pattern. There is much more to it.
BTW; My background includes instructing as well as flying checks
#128
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 1,827
You never HAVE to fly. Takeoffs are ALWAYS optional (Remember, you are the PIC who has to make a DECISION every time you take off, regardless of the rules you fly under). Landings are ALWAYS mandatory!
Fly Safe!
Fly Safe!
#129
Usually, you re-modified your sight picture after letting a student go a bit too far but not far enough you couldn't recover.
It all comes down to becoming complacent and too comfortable. Both can step up an bite you when you least expect it.
Frats,
Lee
#130
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
Yes, there is a difference.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post