Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes >

1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

1500hr / ATP for Part 121 rule passes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2010, 05:30 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 638
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Beat me too it, although I kept forgetting to post it. 135 mins for hauling trash are 1200TT? Why would it only be 250 for hauling 90 paying passengers?
1200TT to be PIC hauling trash. No mins for SIC (not that there's too many of those out there anyway).
iPilot is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 06:17 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captscott26's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 944
Default

OK, here it is, no holding back...

NO 300, 400, 500, etc. SUPER PILOT HAS ANY BUSINESS ATTEMPTING TO FLY AROUND PAYING PAX ON A COMPLICATED JET AC WHILE THE CPT DOES EVERYTHING IN HIS/HER POWER TO PREVENT MR SUPERPILOT FROM TURNING THE JET INTO A SMOLDERING PILE OF SCRAP. I DONT CARE IF YOU DO 1500 HOURS IN A BANNER TOW, ITS STILL EXPERIENCE!!! YOU NEED TO SCARE THE HECK OUT OF YOURSELF A FEW TIMES BY YOURSELF BEFORE YOU GIVE IT A GO WITH 50 LIVES AT STAKE!

Rant over....thank you.
captscott26 is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 08:55 AM
  #113  
marlonmoneda1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool Don't look at it so literally

Too many people are seeing this rule as affecting safety by increasing he hour requirement and those increase hours makin better pilots at regionals. Although i think they will be a little better, I don't believe this is the real intention of the senators nor the family since both pilots had plenty of time and experience when it happened. The legislators and the family mostly show disgust and concern with the way pilots are compensated and treated at the regional level. How do you change that without mandating minimum wages??? Simply create a barrier to entry to boost the demand side of the equation, which will make regionals have to provide a better QOL to attract pilots. This increased quality of life will also yield safer pilots because the main gist of this whole thing was that they were fatigued from having to commute because they couldn't afford to live in base. how do you make regional pilots safer? Create a barrier to entry that will yield better pilots, end up paying them more, and make them less fatigued all the time. All of this equals happier and safer pilots.

People who make the argument that "at one time you needed 1500 hours get hired anyway so this will have no impact on pay" are incorrect. High time requirements in the past have always occurred at times when regionals were hiring the least with pilots everywhere with 250 hours lining at the door. In other words when supply was high and demand was low. once attition and growth start occurring again, which will invariably happen over the long term future, suddenly supply is there with people who've been instructing for the last few years, but once you hire them away from all the instruction jobs (who are being replaced with new cfis who need to instruct for a few years to get to 1500 hours) suddenly you are stuck in a two to three year gap in supply while demand stays constant.

Regionals will still need pilots but with none to fill the spots at that crappy quality of life...then shazam! They will have no choice but to raise pay and benefits to attract pilots against going to another carrier.
 
Old 07-23-2010, 10:04 AM
  #114  
RESERVE
 
gptjjbmj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by marlonmoneda1
Too many people are seeing this rule as affecting safety by increasing he hour requirement and those increase hours makin better pilots at regionals. Although i think they will be a little better, I don't believe this is the real intention of the senators nor the family since both pilots had plenty of time and experience when it happened. The legislators and the family mostly show disgust and concern with the way pilots are compensated and treated at the regional level. How do you change that without mandating minimum wages??? Simply create a barrier to entry to boost the demand side of the equation, which will make regionals have to provide a better QOL to attract pilots. This increased quality of life will also yield safer pilots because the main gist of this whole thing was that they were fatigued from having to commute because they couldn't afford to live in base. how do you make regional pilots safer? Create a barrier to entry that will yield better pilots, end up paying them more, and make them less fatigued all the time. All of this equals happier and safer pilots.

People who make the argument that "at one time you needed 1500 hours get hired anyway so this will have no impact on pay" are incorrect. High time requirements in the past have always occurred at times when regionals were hiring the least with pilots everywhere with 250 hours lining at the door. In other words when supply was high and demand was low. once attition and growth start occurring again, which will invariably happen over the long term future, suddenly supply is there with people who've been instructing for the last few years, but once you hire them away from all the instruction jobs (who are being replaced with new cfis who need to instruct for a few years to get to 1500 hours) suddenly you are stuck in a two to three year gap in supply while demand stays constant.

Regionals will still need pilots but with none to fill the spots at that crappy quality of life...then shazam! They will have no choice but to raise pay and benefits to attract pilots against going to another carrier.
I'm probably the only pilot that disagrees with most of the posts and this rule. I don't agree that numbers in the log book equates to saftey, case in point: As a low time Army helicopter pilot (approx 300 hours) I experienced a single engine flame out while on short final to a mountain spur during mountain training. While the instructor pilot was a very experienced pilot an I believe a good pilot he did just about everything wrong including instructing me to clean up our good engine. I on the other as a low time corrected his mistake. This is not to tout my skills or his failures but simply to point out experience does not automatically equate to saftey. Military pilots often fly sophisticated aircraft in challenging situations due to extensive training which I personally believe would do more to deal with this issue than anything. I believe situations like the Colgan crash has more to do with aptitute than experience. There are some people that do not have the right aptitude to fly. They may go through all the training pass the checkrides, get hired but when something goes wrong they do not have the aptitude to react properly and deal the the situation. I'm not saying I have an answer to this but I do believe many people are in this profession for the wrong reason.
As to many of the posts concerning pay and QOL the last few years there have many factors affecting this industry and a knee jerk reaction will have repurcutions for all of us eventially. I've see low time pilots at the regionals that are great pilots. A bad expample is not more a statement that all low time pilots are incompetent than my expample is that a high time pilot is incompetent.
gptjjbmj is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 12:03 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 453
Default

Not trying to flame your post, but it's not just "the regionals" who hire low time pilots. I can name a dozen people I know who got hired on with a major with a CMEL and less than 1,500 hours.


Originally Posted by marlonmoneda1
Too many people are seeing this rule as affecting safety by increasing he hour requirement and those increase hours makin better pilots at regionals. Although i think they will be a little better, I don't believe this is the real intention of the senators nor the family since both pilots had plenty of time and experience when it happened. The legislators and the family mostly show disgust and concern with the way pilots are compensated and treated at the regional level. How do you change that without mandating minimum wages??? Simply create a barrier to entry to boost the demand side of the equation, which will make regionals have to provide a better QOL to attract pilots. This increased quality of life will also yield safer pilots because the main gist of this whole thing was that they were fatigued from having to commute because they couldn't afford to live in base. how do you make regional pilots safer? Create a barrier to entry that will yield better pilots, end up paying them more, and make them less fatigued all the time. All of this equals happier and safer pilots.

People who make the argument that "at one time you needed 1500 hours get hired anyway so this will have no impact on pay" are incorrect. High time requirements in the past have always occurred at times when regionals were hiring the least with pilots everywhere with 250 hours lining at the door. In other words when supply was high and demand was low. once attition and growth start occurring again, which will invariably happen over the long term future, suddenly supply is there with people who've been instructing for the last few years, but once you hire them away from all the instruction jobs (who are being replaced with new cfis who need to instruct for a few years to get to 1500 hours) suddenly you are stuck in a two to three year gap in supply while demand stays constant.

Regionals will still need pilots but with none to fill the spots at that crappy quality of life...then shazam! They will have no choice but to raise pay and benefits to attract pilots against going to another carrier.
PBSG is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 04:19 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Hours do make the INDIVIDUAL safer.

You, at 300 hours, may be better than your 5000 hour captain:
BUT
YOU will be better at 5000 hours than 300, and do you want to know whay your 5000 hour captain was like at 300????

It is a good idea. ATP as a min would be even better.

It WILL reduce the supply of pilots.

It WILL increase compensation, overall.

cliff
LFW
atpcliff is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 06:05 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff

It is a good idea. ATP as a min would be even better.

It WILL reduce the supply of pilots.

It WILL increase compensation


I'm not convinced that there will be significant salary changes. There will be exemptions added years down the road.

Plus, major "legacy" airlines are free to hire 1500 hour CFI's also. That will happen before pay goes up.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 06:30 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoStep's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Missionary
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff
Hours do make the INDIVIDUAL safer.

You, at 300 hours, may be better than your 5000 hour captain:
BUT
YOU will be better at 5000 hours than 300, and do you want to know whay your 5000 hour captain was like at 300????

It is a good idea. ATP as a min would be even better.

It WILL reduce the supply of pilots.

It WILL increase compensation, overall.

cliff
LFW
...until spray-tan-Cohen @ RAA and his buddies at 141 schools get an exemption.
Right now and for the next few years, there are plenty of experienced guys to hire. When that well dries up, everyone will have forgotten about this, and they'll lobby to amend the rule.
NoStep is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 06:36 PM
  #119  
Line Holder
 
moonkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Not sure anymore
Posts: 95
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by captscott26
OK, here it is, no holding back...

NO 300, 400, 500, etc. SUPER PILOT HAS ANY BUSINESS ATTEMPTING TO FLY AROUND PAYING PAX ON A COMPLICATED JET AC WHILE THE CPT DOES EVERYTHING IN HIS/HER POWER TO PREVENT MR SUPERPILOT FROM TURNING THE JET INTO A SMOLDERING PILE OF SCRAP. I DONT CARE IF YOU DO 1500 HOURS IN A BANNER TOW, ITS STILL EXPERIENCE!!! YOU NEED TO SCARE THE HECK OUT OF YOURSELF A FEW TIMES BY YOURSELF BEFORE YOU GIVE IT A GO WITH 50 LIVES AT STAKE!

Rant over....thank you.

Those are my feelings exactly!
moonkey is offline  
Old 07-24-2010, 03:59 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by Pielut
It will also have no impact on safety because even with the 250 hour wonder, planes have not exactly been falling out of the sky. I think this is more of an "illusion of safety" than a really sound solution. .

Planes have not been "falling out of the sky" because with the stagnation of hiring at majors, the seniority level of regional Captains is higher than it has ever been.... it was those senior Captains that kept the planes from falling out of the air as you call it... not the highly experienced 250 hour new hire. Apparently you either weren't paying attention a few years ago when all the horror stories were flying across the message boards, or you aren't a Captain and haven't flown with those kids.
Mason32 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8rrob
United
13
09-02-2010 06:18 PM
jsled
Union Talk
2
05-18-2010 08:57 AM
BoilerUP
Regional
102
02-26-2010 02:31 PM
CaliPilot
Aviation Law
1
09-19-2009 11:33 AM
whoareyou310
Flight Schools and Training
7
09-23-2008 10:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices